Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2017-1
Do national welfare systems have an influence on interdisciplinary collaborations within schools of social work and their communities? The case of the Nordic countries
This study of educational programs in schools of social work in the Nordic countries focuses on interdisciplinary collaboration in teaching, research, field practice, and community involvement. The study makes comparisons with similar studies in the United States, Israel, Canada, and Hungary. It takes those studies a step further by discussing whether the national welfare system influences interdisciplinary collaboration in the educational programs in the respective countries.
AbrahamsonJ.S.MizrahiT. (2003) ‘Understanding Collaboration between Social Workers and Physicians. Application of a Typology’, Social Work in Health Care37(2): 71–100.
2.
AmeyM.J.BrownD.F. (2004) Breaking Out of the Box: Interdisciplinary Collaboration in Faculty Work. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
3.
Berg-WegerM.SchneiderF.D. (1998) ‘Interdisciplinary Collaboration in Social Work Education’, Journal of Social Work Education34(1): 97–107.
4.
BjørkeG. (ed.) (2012) ‘Kvalifisering for tverrprofesjonelt samarbeid i helse- og sosialsektoren’ [Qualifying for inter-professional collaboration in health and social services sectors]. Sluttrapport – CAB-prosjektet [Final Report – CAB-project] Collaboration across professional Boundaries (Småskrift nr. 3). Oslo: Oslo University College.
5.
BronsteinL.R. (2003) ‘A Model for Interdisciplinary Collaboration’, Social Work48(3): 297–306.
6.
BronsteinL.R.WrightK. (2006) ‘The impact of Prison Hospice. Collaboration among Social Workers and Other Professionals in a Criminal Justice Setting that Promotes Care for the Dying’, Journal of Social Work in End-of-Life and Palliative Care2(4): 85–102.
7.
BronsteinL.R.AbrahamsonS.J. (2003) ‘Understanding Socialization of Teachers and Social Workers. Groundwork for Collaboration in the Schools’, Families in Society84(3): 323–30.
8.
BronsteinL.R.MizrahiT.Korazim-KőrösyY.McPheeD. (2010) ‘Interdisciplinary Collaboration in Social Work Education in the USA, Israel and Canada: Deans’ and Directors’ Perspectives’, International Social Work53(4): 457–73.
9.
Carey-BelangerE. (2001) ‘Social Work in Canada’, in HutchinsonG.S.LundL.LyngstadR.OltedalS. (eds) Social Work in Five Countries. Professional, Educational and Social Policy Context for Social Work in Australia, Canada, Norway, Russia and USA (HBO- report 25/2001), Bodø, Norway, pp. 47–107.
10.
ChristiansenN.F.MarkkolaP. (2006) ‘Introduction’, in ChristiansenN.F.PetersenK.EdlingN.HaaveP. (eds) The Nordic Model of Welfare. A Historical Reappraisal, 9–31, Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press, University of Copenhagen.
11.
Esping-AndersenG. (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12.
FergeZ. (1992) ‘Social Policy Regimes and Social Structural Hypotheses about the Prospects of Social Policy in Central and Eastern Europe’, in FergeZ.S.KolbergJ.E. (eds) Social Policy in Changing Europe. Frankfurt am Main: Campus Verlag, pp. 201–223.
13.
GrossmanB.McCormickK. (2003) ‘Preparing Social Work Students for Interdisciplinary Practice. Learnings from a Curriculum Development Project’, Journal of Human Behaviour in the Social Environment7(1–2): 97–113.
14.
HabibJ. (2001) ‘Issues and Developments in the Israeli Welfare State’, in Ben-AriehA.GalJ. (eds) Into the Promised Land – Issues Facing the Welfare State, Praeger, pp. 102–13.
15.
HarveyD. (2005) A Brief History of Neoliberalism. New York: Oxford University Press.
16.
HessleS. (2001) International Standard Setting of Higher Social Work Education. Stockholm: Stockholms Universitet.
17.
JanssonB. (2011) The Reluctant Welfare State. Engaging History to Advanced Social Work Practice in Contemporary Society, 7th edn.New York: Brooks/Cole Cengage Learning.
18.
KopY.BlankettJ.SharonD. (1989) ‘Government Expenditure on Social Services’, in KopY. (ed.) Israel’s Social Services – 1988–89. Jerusalem, Israel: The Center for Social Policy Studies in Israel, pp. 7–30.
19.
Korazim-KőrösyJ. (2000) ‘Toward a New Balance between Governmental and Non- Governmental Community Work: The Case of Israel’, Community Development Journal35(3): 276–89.
20.
LauvåsK.LauvåsP. (2004) Tverrfaglig samarbeid. Perspektiv og strategi [Interdisciplinary Collaboration. Perspective and strategy]. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
21.
LawsonH.A. (2008) ‘Collaborative Practice’, in MizrahiT.DavisL.E. (eds) Encyclopedia of Social Work, 20th edn, pp. 141–7. New York: Oxford University Press;Washington, DC: NASW Press.
22.
LelkesO. (2000) ‘A Great Leap towards Liberalism? The Hungarian Welfare State’, International Journal of Social Welfare9(2): 92–102.
23.
LindenR. (2002) ‘A Framework for Collaborating’, Public Manager31(2): 3–6.
24.
LorentzW. (1994) Social work in a Changing Europe. London: Routledge.
25.
MaidenbergM.P.GolickT. (2001) ‘Developing or Enhancing Interdisciplinary Programs: A Model for Teaching Collaboration’, Professional Development in Social Work: The International Journal of Continuing Social Work Education4(2): 15–24.
26.
Meld. St. 13 (2011–2012) [White Paper nr. 13 (2011–2012)] Utdanning for velferd. Samspill i praksis [Education in Welfare. Cooperation in Practice]. Oslo: Kunnskapsdepartementet [The Ministry of Education and Research].
27.
MishraR. (1996) ‘North America: Poverty Amidst Plenty’, in ØyenE.MillerS.M.SyedA.S. (eds) Poverty: A Global Review. Handbook on International Poverty Research. Oslo; Stockholm; Copenhagen; Boston, MA: Scandinavian University Press, pp. 453–493.
28.
ProvanK.G.NakamaL.VeazieM.A.DefuelN.I.HuddlestoneC. (2003) ‘Building community Capacity around Chronic Disease Services through a Collaborative Interorganizational Network’, Health Education & Behavior30: 646–62.
29.
RothmanJ. (2013) ‘Education for Macro Intervention – A Survey of Problems and Prospects, Association for Community Organization and Social Administration’, Unpublished document.
30.
Swedish Code of Statues (SFS) (1992) Relevanta mål och förskrifter i högskoleförordningen [Relevant Objectives and Regulations in Higher Education].
31.
Svensk Förfatningssamling (SFS)1992, (Swedish Code of Statues) Relevanta mål och förskrifter i högskoleförordningen [Relevant Objectives and Regulations in Higher Education.
32.
SpiroS. (1967) ‘Lines about Community Work in Israel’ (Introductory Chapter to the Hebrew Edition), in BattenT. R. (ed.) Communities and Their Development, pp. a–I. Jerusalem, Israel: Massada Publisher. (in Hebrew), pp. a–i.
33.
StraussH. (2008) ‘Social Work in the Nordic Countries: Contemporary Trends and Shifts in Education and Policy’, International Social Work51(2): 253–61.
34.
TerumL.I. (1996) Grenser for sosialpolitisk modernisering [Limits to Social Modernization]. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
35.
TörökP.Korazim-KőrösyY. (2012) ‘Interdisciplinarity in Social Work Education in Hungary’, International Social Work55: 185–204.
36.
Undervisningsministeriet [Ministry of Education] (2008) Regulations for Education as Social Worker, §3, punkt c.
