This qualitative study explores the unique views about the family system held by adolescents who have spent years in foster care in Israel. This inductive study is among the few to address the unheard views held, and the salient challenges faced, by adolescents who have not grown up in their biological parents’ home, with a focus on their view of the family.
Findings
Participants’ demonstrated conflicting, polarizing perceptions of the family: (a) family is a genetic system: blood is thicker than water; (b) the family system is constructed and limited by terminology; and (c) communication is essential to family life.
Applications
While the first two themes highlighted the participants’ family of origin as their “true family” the last theme emphasized on the foster family as their “true” family system. Synthesis between these views could not be achieved as informants embraced the social expectation perceiving the family as one. Raising social and professional awareness about the difficulties these young people face partly because of an exclusive social view of the family lies in the sphere of interest and the social work professional expertise.
AllanG. (2008) Flexibility, friendship, and family. Personal Relationships15: 1–16. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2007.00181.x.
2.
AnderssonG. (2009) Foster children: A longitudinal study of placements and family relationships. International Journal of Social Welfare18(1): 13–26. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2397.2008.00570.x.
3.
Arad-DavidzonB.BenbenishtyR. (2008) The role of workers’ attitudes and parent and child wishes in child protection workers’ assessments and recommendation regarding removal and reunification. Children and Youth Services Review30(1): 107–121. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2007.07.003.
4.
Barak-MedinaA. (2002) Privatization of foster care services, Jerusalem, Israel: Parliament Research Center [Hebrew].
5.
BaxterL. A.HenauwC.HuismanD.LivesayC.NorwoodK.SuH.YoungB. (2009) Lay conceptions of “family”: A replication and extension. Journal of Family Communication9: 170–189. doi:10.1080/15267430902963342.
6.
BenbenishtyR.SegevD. (2002) Characteristics and predictors of the length of foster care arrangement. MifgashLa’avodaChinochitSozialit16: 93–114 [Hebrew].
7.
Boszormenyi-NagyI.SparkG. (1973) Invisible loyalties: Reciprocity in intergenerational family therapy, New York, NY: Harper & Row.
8.
BrannenJ. (1999) Discourses of adolescence. Making Sense of Social Development3: 214–230.
9.
CabreraN. J.Tamis-LeMondaC. S.BradleyR. H.HofferthS.LambM. E. (2000) Fatherhood in the twenty-first century. Child Development71: 127–136. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00126.
10.
CarboneJ. A.SawyerM. G.SearleA. K.RobinsonP. J. (2007) The health-related quality of life of children and adolescents in home-based foster care. Quality of Life Research16(7): 1157–1166. doi:10.1007/s11136-007-9227-z.
CrumW. (2010) Foster parent parenting characteristics that lead to increased placement stability or disruption. Children and Youth Services Review32(2): 185–190. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2009.08.022.
13.
DalyK. (2001) Minding the time: Toward a theoretical expansion of time in families. In: DalyK. (ed.) Minding the time in family experience: Emerging perspectives and issues, New York, NY: JAI, pp. 1–16.
14.
DolevT.BenbenishtyR.TimmerA. (1997) Child welfare decision committees in Israel: Organization, processes and outcomes, Jerusalem, Israel: Brookdale Institute, JDC Research report.
15.
Fogiel-Bijaoui, S. (1999). Families in Israel: Postfeminism, feminism and the state. In D. Izraeli, et al. (Eds), Sex, gender, politics: Women in Israel (pp. 107–167). Tel Aviv, Israel: HakibbutzHameuhad [Hebrew].
16.
FolmanR. D. (1998) “I Was Tooken” how children experience removal from their parents preliminary to placement into foster care. Adoption Quarterly2(2): 7–35. doi:10.1300/J145v02n02_02.
17.
Gavriel-FriedB.ShiloG.CohenO. (2012) How do social workers define the concept of family?The British Journal of Social Work44: 992–1010. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcs176.
18.
Gavriel-Fried, B., Shilo, G., & Cohen, O. (2014). How do social workers define the concept of family?. British Journal of Social Work, 44(4), 992–1010. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcs176.
19.
GubaE.LincolnY. (1985) Effective evaluation: Improving the usefulness of evaluation results through responses and naturalist approaches, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
20.
HarrisS. R. (2008) What is family diversity?Journal of Family Issues29: 1407–1425.
21.
HoW. C. (2012) The limit of the discursive: A critique of the radical constructionist approach to family experience. The Sociological Quarterly53(3): 321–340. doi:10.1111/j.1533-8525.2012.01237.x. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7758/9781610447201.
Korazim-KorosyY.LebowitzS.SchmidH. (2005) Partial privatization of foster care: Issues and lessons after 4 years of practice. Social Security70: 56–77 [Hebrew].
LaveeY.KatzR. (2003) The family in Israel. Marriage and Family Review35: 193–217.
27.
LeeR. E.WhitingJ. B. (2007) Foster children’s expressions of ambiguous loss. The American Journal of Family Therapy35(5): 417–428. doi:10.1080/01926180601057499.
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Designing qualitative studies. Qualitative research and evaluation methods, 3, 230–246.
31.
PowellB.BlozendahlC.GeistC.SteelmanL. C. (2010) Counted out: Same-sex relations and Americans’ definitions of family, New York, NY: Sage.
32.
QuestA. D.FullertonA.GeenenS.PowersL. (2012) Voices of youth in foster care and special education regarding their educational experiences and transition to adulthood. Children and Youth Services Review34(9): 1604–1615. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2012.04.018.
33.
Rom, M. & Benjamin, O. (2011). Feminism, family, and identity in Israel: Women's marital names. (pp. 155–185). Manchester: Palgrave Macmillan. Doi:10.1057/97802301 18942.
SchofieldG. (2003) Part of the family. Pathways through foster care, London, UK: British Association for Adoption & Fostering (BAAF)doi:10.1111/j.1365-2206.2004.t01-4-00317.x.
ShawS. M.HavitzM. E.DelemereF. M. (2008) “I decided to invest in my kids’ memories”: Family vacations, memories, and the social construction of the family. Tourism Culture and Communication8(1): 13–26. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.3727/109830408783900361.
39.
SmithB.SparkesA. C. (2006) Narrative inquiry in psychology: Exploring the tensions within. Qualitative Research in Psychology3(3): 169–192. doi:10.1191/1478088706qrp068oa.
40.
SpreyJ. (2001) Time bound. In: DalyK. (ed.) Minding the time in family experience: Emerging perspectives and issues, New York, NY: JAI, pp. 37–57.
41.
Tarren-SweeneyM. (2008) Retrospective and concurrent predictors of the mental health of children in care. Children and Youth Services Review30(1): 1–25. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2007.05.014.
42.
Thoburn, J. (1994). Child placement: Principles and practice. Aldershot: Arena.
TillmanK. H.NamC. B. (2008) Family structure outcomes of alternative family definitions. Population Research and Policy Review27(3): 367–384. doi:10.1007/s11113-007-9067-0.
45.
TolonenT. (2005) Locality and gendered capital of working-class youth. Young13(4): 343–361. doi:10.1177/1103308805057052.
46.
TurtiainenP.KarvonenS.RahkonenO. (2007) All in the family? The structure and meaning of family life among young people. Journal of Youth Studies10(4): 477–493. doi:10.1080/13676260701262889.
47.
United Nations. (1997). Principles and Recommendations for Population and Housing Censuses. Statistical Papers, Series M, 67/Rev.1.
48.
van AndelH. W.GrietensH.KnorthE. J. (2012) Foster Carer-Foster Child Intervention (FFI): An intervention designed to reduce stress in young children placed in a foster family. Adoption and Fostering36(2): 19–28. doi:10.1177/030857591203600203.
49.
VangelistiA. L.CrumleyL. P.BakerJ. L. (1999) Family portraits: Stories as standards for family relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships16: 335–368. doi:10.1177/0265407599163004.
50.
WallaceC.KovatchevaS. (1998) Modernization and the construction of youth. In: WallaceC.KovatchevaS. (eds) Youth in society, London, UK: Macmillan, pp. 47–84.
51.
WhitingJ. B.LeeR. E. (2003) Voices from the system: A qualitative study of foster children’s stories. Family Relations52(3): 288–295. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3729.2003.00288.x.
