• Summary: Boys and men are subjected to sexual assault, with perpetrators drawn from both sexes. This article discusses the necessity of recognizing the victim position as a possibility within an understanding of manliness. As well as being a necessary part of work with boys and men who have been subjected to abuse, the inclusion of the victim dimension will expand and add nuance to the perception of manliness in general. An argument for the involvement of social work in the field is offered based on an understanding of its mandate and responsibility as a profession.
• Findings: A traditional view of manliness stands in the way of men being taken seriously as assault victims. Despite more recent academic and professional discourses on men as victims, a traditional ideal of manliness is still a reality with considerable influence on institutions and attitudes. Sexually abused men tend to judge themselves according to an ideal of manliness that does not allow a man to be a victim, and are thereby silenced.
• Applications: These findings have relevance for social work students, for social work practice and supervision and for directing professional attention towards the aspects of gender issues represented in sexual abuse of males.
AndersenT. H. (2001) Tause menn: Seksuelle overgrep mot gutter i kristne miljøer, Oslo: Verbum.
2.
AndersenT. H.(2002) Det er bare slik det er. Menn, makt og overgrep i lys av symbolsk vold. In: LundstølJ. (ed.) I dannelsens tegn: Profesjonell selvforståelse i arbeid med mennesker, Oslo: Gyldendal akademisk, pp. 133–152.
3.
AndersenT. H. (2005) A particular case of the possible. Qualitative Social Work. 4(3): 253–270.
4.
AndersenT. H. (2008a) Men dealing with memories of childhood sexual abuse: Conditions and possibilities of `positive deviance'. Journal of Social Work Practice. 22(1): 51–65.
5.
AndersenT. H. (2008b) Speaking about the unspeakable: Sexually abused men striving toward language. American Journal of Men's Health. 2(1): 25–36.
6.
AntonovskyA. (1987) Unraveling the mystery of health: How people manage stress and stay well, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
7.
BakkenR. (2001) Modermordet: Om sykepleie, kjønn og kultur, Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
8.
BakkenR. (2004) Mann i ingenmannsland: Et essay om menn og omsorg, hjemme og ute, Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.
9.
Barne- og likestillingsdepartementet (2008) Om menn, mannsroller og likestilling (St.meld. nr. 8 (2008-2009)), Oslo: Regjeringen.
EdleyN.(2001) Analysing masculinity: Interpretative repertoires, ideological dilemmas and subject positions. In: WetherellM.TaylorS.YatesS. J. (eds) Discourse as data: A guide for analysis, London: Sage, pp. 189–229.
22.
EdleyN.WetherellM.(1996) Masculinity, power and identity. In: Mac an GhaillM. (ed.) Understanding masculinities: Social relations and cultural arenas, Buckingham: Open University Press, pp. 97–113.
23.
EdleyN.WetherellM. (1997) Jockeying for position: The construction of masculine identities. Discourse & Society. 8(2): 203–217.
24.
EkenstamC.(1998a) En historia om manlig gråt. In: EkenstamC.FrykmanT.KuosmanenJ.LjunggrenJ.NilssonA. (eds) Rädd att falla. Studier i manlighet (pp. 50–123), Stockholm: Gidlunds förlag.
25.
EkenstamC.(1998b) Kroppen, viljan och skräcken för att falla: Ur den manliga självbehärskningens historia. In: EkenstamC.FrykmanT.KuosmanenJ.Ljunggren,J.NilssonA. (eds) Rädd att falla. Studier i manlighet (pp. 26–49), Stockholm: Gidlunds förlag.
26.
EngH.(2006) Homo og queerforskning. In: MühleisenW.Lorentzen,J.BondevikH. (eds) Kjønnsforskning: En grunnbok (pp. 136–149), Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
27.
FogJ. (2004) Med samtalen som udgangspunkt: Det kvalitative forskningsinterview, København: Akademisk Forlag.
28.
GartnerR. B. (1999) Betrayed as boys: Psychodynamic treatment of sexually abused men, New York: Guilford Press.
29.
GartnerR. B. (2005) Beyond betrayal: Taking charge of your life after boyhood sexual abuse, Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
30.
GergenK. J. (1999) An invitation to social construction, London and Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31.
GergenK. J.GergenM. (2003) Social construction: A reader, London and Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
32.
GilD. G. (1975) Unraveling child abuse. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry. 45(3): 346–356.
33.
HalvorsenK. (2002) Sosiale problemer: En sosiologisk innføring, Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.
34.
HearnJ.(1996) Is masculinity dead? A critique of the concept of masculinity/masculinity. In: Mac an GhaillM. (ed.) Understanding masculinities: Social relations and cultural arenas, Buckingham and Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press, pp. 202–217.
35.
HearnJ. (2004) From hegemonic masculinity to the hegemony of men. Feminist Theory. 5(1): 49–72.
36.
HennumR. (2004) Seksuelle overgrep mot barn: Omfang og rettsapparatets behandling, Oslo: Redd barna.
37.
HolmesW. C.SlapG. B. (1998) Sexual abuse of boys: Definition, prevalence, correlates, sequelae, and management. JAMA. 280(21): 1855–1862.
38.
HolterØ. G. (2003) Can men do it? Men and gender equality – the Nordic experience (Vol. TemaNord 510), Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers.
39.
HolterØ. G.(2005) Social research theories for researching men and masculinities: Direct gender hierarcy and structural inequality. In: KimmelM. S.HearnJ.ConnellR. W. (eds) Handbook of studies on men & masculinities, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 15–34.
40.
HolterØ. G.FrøbergS. (1999) Mannsforskning i Norge: En forskningsoversikt: En litteraturliste, Oslo: Norges forskningsråd.
41.
HonnethA.(2003) Moralbevissthet og sosialt klasseherredømme. In: WilligR. (ed.) Behovet for anerkendelse: En tekstsamling, København: Hans Reitzel, pp. 50–72.
42.
HutchinsonG. S. (2004) Samfunnsarbeid - undervurdert som arbeidsmåte?Nordisk sosialt arbeid. 24(3): 223–234.
43.
HutchinsonG. S. (2007) Sosialt arbeid i kommunen: Samfunnsmandat og handlingsrom, Oslo: Gyldendal akademisk.
44.
HøilundP.JuulS. (2005) Anerkendelse og dømmekraft i socialt arbejde, København: Reitzel.
45.
JonesA. (2002) Of rights and men: Towards a minoritarian framing of male experience. Journal of Human Rights. 1(3): 387–403.
46.
JonesA. (2006) Straight as a rule. Men and Masculinities. 8(4): 451–469.
47.
KarlsenM. B. (2001) ‘I Venskabs Paradiis’: En studie av maskulinitet og vennskap mellom menn, Oslo: Den norske historiske forening.
48.
KulickD. (2005) Same-sex cultures and sexualities: An anthropological reader (pp. 60–72) In: RobertsonJ. (ed.) Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
49.
KvaleS. (1996) InterViews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
50.
LangfeldtT. (2005) Erotikk og fundamentalisme: Fra Mesopotamia til Kvinnefronten, Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
51.
LaugerudS. (2007) En splittet offeropplevelse. Et offerperspektiv på seksuelle overgrep og rettssystemet. Masterthesis, Universitetet i Oslo.
52.
LewM. (2004) Victims no longer: The classic guide for men recovering from sexual child abuse, 2nd ed. New York: Quill.
LisakD. (1993) Men as victims: Challenging cultural myths. Journal of Traumatic Stress. 6(4): 577–580.
55.
LisakD. (1994) The psychological impact of sexual abuse: Content analysis of interviews with male survivors. Journal of Traumatic Stress. 7(4): 525–548.
56.
LisakD. (1995) Integrating a critique of gender in the treatment of male survivors of childhood abuse. Psychotherapy. 32(2): 258–269.
57.
LisakD.(1998) Confronting and treating empathic disconnection in violent men. In: LevantR. F.PollackW. S. (eds) New psychotherapy for men (pp. 214–236), New York: John Wiley.
58.
LorentzenJ.(2006) Forskning på menn og maskuliniteter. In: LorentzenJ.MühleisenW. (eds) Kjønnsforskning: En grunnbok, Oslo: Universitetsforlaget, pp. 121–135.
59.
McLeanJ. (2003) Men as minority: Men employed in statutory social care work. Journal of Social Work. 3: 45–68.
60.
MendelM. P. (1995) The male survivor: The impact of sexual abuse, London: Sage.
61.
MillerP. M.LisakD. (1999) Associations between childhood abuse and personality disorder symptoms in college males. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 14(6): 642–656.
PotterJ.WetherellM. (1987) Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behaviour, London: Sage.
64.
RubingtonE.WeinbergM. S.(2003) Social problems and sociology. In: RubingtonE.WeinbergM. S. (eds) The study of social problems: Seven perspectives, 6th ed. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 3–11.
65.
SeidlerV. J. (1997) Man enough: Embodying masculinities, London: Sage.
66.
SeidlerV. J. (2006) Transforming masculinities: Men, cultures, bodies, power, sex and love, London: Routledge.
67.
Senter for seksuelt missbrukte menn (2006) Årsmelding [Annual Report], Oslo: Senter for seksuelt missbrukte menn.
68.
SheppardM. (1995) Social work, social science and practice wisdom. British Journal of Social Work. 25(3): 265–293.
69.
SheppardM. (1998) Practice validity, reflexivity and knowledge for social work. British Journal of Social Work. 28(5): 763–781.
70.
Sogn, H., & Hjemdal, O. K. (2010) Vold mot menn i nære relasjoner: Kunnskapsgjennomgang og rapport fra et pilotprosjekt. Oslo: Nasjonalt kunnskapssenter om vold og traumatisksk stress a/s.
71.
SoydanH. (1999) The history of ideas in social work, Birmingham: British Association of Social Workers.
72.
SpiegelJ. (2003) Sexual abuse of males: The SAM model of theory and practice, New York: Brunner-Routledge.
73.
SætreM. (1997) Samfunnsproblemet som ‘forsvant’ en kritikk av tendensen til å minimalisere omfanget av seksuelle overgrep mot barn. Tidsskrift for Norsk psykologforening. 34(1 (suppl.)): 53–61.
74.
TewJ. (2006) Understanding power and powerlessness: Towards a framework for emancipatory practice in social work. Journal of Social Work. 6(1): 33–51.
75.
TryggestadD. I. (2005, 5 November) Mannevoldtekten vekker interesse over hele verden. Bergens Tidende, p. 7.
WatkinsB.BentovimA.(2000) Male children and adolescents as victims: A review of current knowledge. In: MezeyG. C.KingM. B. (eds) Male victims of sexual assault, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 35–77.
