Is social work a green profession? An examination of environmental beliefs

Abstract

• Summary: Social work has developed to meet the needs of an industrializing society. As environmental concerns have increased, national, and international social work organizations have called on social workers to incorporate issues of the environment into their professional practice. Although there is a small body of literature related to social work and the environment, the profession has not fully embraced the need to incorporate these issues into social work education or practice. This cross-sectional survey in the United States of a random sample of National Association of Social Workers (NASW) members (n = 373) was designed to gauge the environmental knowledge and attitudes of social work professionals.

• Findings: Though social work shares many of the same underlying tenets of groups interested in environmental justice, results suggest that social workers as a profession are no more, nor less, environmentally friendly than the general population.

• Applications: By failing to incorporate ecological issues facing the United States and abroad, our current social policies are at best not sustainable, and at worst dangerous for our continued social well-being. Social workers can play a leading role through an understanding of the interrelationship that exists between people and the environment, the integration of environmental issues into their social work practice, and advocating for vulnerable populations.

Keywords

social work ecologic environment environment NASW NEPS

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Albrecht

Gordon

Hoiberg

Nowak

. (1982). The new environmental paradigm scale. Journal of Environmental Education, 13(3), 39–43.

Bartlett

. (2003). Two movements that have shaped a nation: A course in the convergence of professional values and environmental struggles. Critical Social Work, 4(1), 107–130.

Benton

. (1994). Environmental knowledge and attitudes of faculty: Business versus arts and sciences. Journal of Education for Business, 70(1), 12–16.

Berger

R. M.

Kelly

J. J.

. (1993). Social work in the ecological crisis. Social Work, 38(5), 521–526.

Besthorn, F. H. (1997). Reconceptualizing social work's person-in-environment perspective: Explorations in radical environmental thought. Social Work Dissertation, University of Kansas.

British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC). (2007). All countries need to take major steps on climate change: Global poll. Retrieved 1 January 2010 from: http://www.bbc.co.uk/pressoffice/pressreleases/stories/2007/09_september/25/climate.shtml.

Brower, A. M. (1988). Can the ecological model guide social work practice? Social Service Review, 62, 411–429.

Cahill

. (1994). The new social policy. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

Cahill

Fitzpatrick

. (2002). Environmental issues and social welfare. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

10.

Carrilio

T. E.

. (2007). Utilizing a social work perspective to enhance sustainable development efforts in Loreto, Mexico. International Social Work, 50(4), 528–538.

11.

Coates

. (2003). Exploring the roots of the environmental crisis: Opportunity for social transformation. Critical Social Work, 4(1), 44–66.

12.

Dietz

Stern

P. C.

Guagnano

G. A.

. (1998). Social structural and social psychological bases of environmental concern. Environment and Behavior, 30(4), 450–472.

13.

Dillman

Carley-Baxter

. (2000). Structural determinants of mail survey response rates over a 12 year period, 1988–1999. National Park Visitors Project, University of Idaho.

14.

Dunlap

R. E.

Van Liere

K. D.

. (1978). A proposed measuring instrument and preliminary results: The ‘new environmental paradigm’. Journal of Environmental Education, 9, 10–19.

15.

Dunlap

R. R.

Van Liere

K. D.

Mertig

A. G.

Jones

R. E.

. (2000). Measuring endorsement of the New Ecological Paradigm: A revised NEP scale. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 425–442.

16.

Estes

. (1993). Toward sustainable development: From theory to praxis. Social Development Issues, 15(3), 1–25.

17.

Fitzpatrick

. (1998). The implications of ecological thought for social welfare. Critical Social Policy, 18(54), 5–26.

18.

Geller

J. M.

Lasley

. (1985). The New Environmental Paradigm Scale: A reexamination. Journal of Environmental Education, 17(3), 9–12.

19.

Germain, C. B., & Gitterman, A. (1987) Ecological perspective. In A. Minahan (Ed.-in-Chief), Encyclopedia of social work (18th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 488–499). Silver Spring, MD: National Association of Social Workers.

20.

Hayward

Turtle

Carpenter

Hanson

. (2007) Attitudes and behaviour in relation to the Environment Report. (2007) Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, London, Retrieved 1 January 2010 from http://www.defra.gov.uk/.

21.

Hodgkinson

Innes

J. M.

. (2000). The prediction of ecological and environmental belief systems: The differential contributions of social conservatism and beliefs about money. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 20(3), 285–294.

22.

Hoff

. (1998). Sustainable community development: Studies in economic, environmental, and cultural revitalization. Boston, MA: Lewis Publishers.

23.

Hoff

McNutt

. (2000). Social policy and the physical environment. In Midgley

Tracy

Livermore

(Eds.), The handbook of social policy (pp. 461–478). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

24.

International Federation of Social Workers. (2004). International Policy Statement on Globalisation and the Environment. International Federation of Social Workers. Retrieved 1 January 2010 from http://www.ifsw.org/p38000222.html.

25.

Kalof

Thomas

Gregory

Paul

C. S.

. (2002). Race, gender and environmentalism: The atypical values and beliefs of white men. race, gender and class. Conference, 9(2), 112–130.

26.

LaTrobe

H. L.

Acott

T. G.

. (2000). A modified NEP/DSP Environmental attitudes scale. The Journal of Environmental Education, 32(1), 12–20.

27.

Leiby

. (1978). A history of social welfare and social work in the United States. New York: Columbia University Pres.

28.

Loges

Kidder

. (2000). Reaching out: Broadening college-student constituencies for environmental protection. Camden, ME: Institute for Global Ethics.

29.

Maloney

M. P.

Michael

P. W.

. (1973). Ecology: Let’s hear from the people. American Psychologist, 28(7), 583–586.

30.

Mary

. (2008). Social work in a sustainable world. Chicago, IL: Lyceum Books, Inc.

31.

Matthies

Narhi

Ward

. (2001). The eco-social approach in social work. Finland: SoPhi Academic Press.

32.

Midgley

. (1994). Defining social development: Historical trends and conceptual formulations. Social Development Issues, 16(3), 3–20.

33.

Midgley

. (1995). Globalization, capitalism and social welfare: A social development perspective. In Midgley

(Ed.), Social work and globalization (pp. 13–28). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

34.

Milbrath

L. W.

. (1994). Stumbling blocks to a sustainable society: Incoherences in key premises about the way the world works. Futures, 26(2), 117–124.

35.

Miller

D. C.

. (1991). Handbook of research design and social measurement (5th ed.). Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.

36.

National Association of Social Workers (NASW). (1999). ‘Code of Ethics' as approved by the 1996 NASW Delegate Assembly and revised by the 1999 NASW Delegate Assembly. National Association of Social Workers. Retrieved 15 October 2005 from http://www.naswdc.org/pubs/code/code.asp.

37.

National Association of Social Workers (NASW). (2003a). Environmental policy. In Social work speaks (pp. 116-123). Washington, DC: NASW Press.

38.

National Association of Social Workers (NASW). (2003b). Practice research network. National Association of Social Workers. Retrieved 15 October 2005 from http://www.naswdc.org/naswprn/default.asp.

39.

National Association of Social Workers (NASW). (2005). The power of social work. National Association of Social Workers. Retrieved 25 October 2005 from http://www.naswdc.org/images/new_look/membershipMap.gif.

40.

Novotny, P. (1995). Framing and political movements: A study of four cases from the environmental justice movement (social movements, African Americans, labor movement). Dissertation, The University of Wisconsin.

41.

Pandey

. (1996). Deforestation and rural poverty in developing countries: The role of social work. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 20(3), 93–112.

42.

Pandey

. (1998). Women, environment, and sustainable development. International Social Work, 41(3), 339–355.

43.

Park

K. M.

. (1994). The personal is ecological: Environmentalism of social work. Social Work, 41(3), 320–322.

44.

Pollack

. (2007). Social workers and the United Nations. International Social Work, 50(1), 113–119.

45.

Reisch

Andrews

. (2001). The road not taken: A history of radical social work in the United States. Philadelphia, PA: Brunner-Routledge.

46.

Rogge

. (1993). Social work, disenfranchised communities, and the natural environment: Field education opportunities. Journal of Social Work Education, 29(1), 111–120.

47.

Rogge

. (1996). Social vulnerability to toxic risk. Journal of Social Service Research, 22(1/2), 109–122.

48.

Rogge, M. E. (2000). Social development and the ecological tradition. Social Development Issues, 22(1), 32–41. Special Issue on Social Development and Theoretical Perspectives.

49.

Rogge

Combs-Orme

. (2003). Protecting our future: Children, environmental policy, and social work. Social Work, 48(4), 439–450.

50.

Rogge

Cox

M. E.

. (2001). The person-in-environment perspective in social work journals: A computer-assisted content analysis. Journal of Social Service Research, 28(2), 47–68.

51.

Saad, L. (2003, 17 April). Environmental concern down this Earth Day: Economic woes may be the cause. The Gallup Organization. Retrieved 12 October 2005 from http://poll.gallup.com.

52.

Saad, L. (2005, 14 June). Environmental quality: Public's perceptions at odds with experts: Americans, Canadians, and Britons offer bleak assessments. The Gallup Organization. Retrieved 15 October 2005from http://poll.gallup.com.

53.

Shaw

T. V.

. (2008). An ecological contribution to social welfare theory. Social Development Issues, 30(3), 13–26.

54.

Smith

Z. A.

. (1995). The environmental policy paradox. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

55.

Stern

P. C.

Dietz

Kalof

. (1993). Value orientations, gender, and environmental concern. Environment & Behavior, 25(5), 322–348.

56.

Tarrant

Cordell

H. K.

. (1997). The effect of respondent characteristics on general environmental attitude-behavior correspondence. Environment and Behavior, 29(5), 618–638.

57.

Tarrant

Bright

Cordell

H. K.

. (1997). Attitudes toward wildlife species protection: Assessing moderating and mediating effects in the value-attitude relationship. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 2(2), 1–20.

58.

Uyeki

E. S.

Holland

L. J.

. (2000). Diffusion of pro-environment attitudes. American Behavioral Scientist, 43(4), 646–663.

59.

Weigel

. (1978). Environmental concern: The development of a measure. Environment and Behavior, 10(1), 3–15.