Trust,risk and the (mis)management of contingency and discretion through new information technologies in children’s services

Abstract

• Summary: While UK social work’s core purpose in children’s services continues to invoke the ready virtues of universal care, protection from significant harm and a child rights led approach as foundational to effective intervention, there is a ‘real-world’ context of organizational practices that inevitably mediate who gets what services and why. This was ever thus. What has changed however is not so much the claims by social work to a virtuous purpose (the ethic of care offers a durable discourse from which to cast service users as worthy and our efforts as honourable) but that new risk-reduction technologies are exposing a worrying gap between the rhetoric of a humane-oriented project of care and the actionable decision-making of professionals drawing upon administrative targeting systems that seek to reduce organizational exposure to error, blame, reputational damage and unwanted external scrutiny.

• Findings: The article exposes a gap between core values and risk management by examining the erosion of trust in professional social work and consequent shift towards new information technologies which intend to generate system confidence, such as the Integrated Children’s System (ICS) which seeks to provide a more accountable management of contingency. Drawing on data from our recent multi-method research of frontline practice funded by the UK Economic and Social Research Council, we challenge the view that the uncertainty and ambiguity of risk-immersed social work can be more safely moderated by computer-based technologies for reporting and decision-making.

• Applications: The findings of this study suggest the need for significant reform of the ICS system. Our explorations in front line decision-making suggests that the IT workflow systems that channel and shape the way need is responded to in order to make actions and their often distributed ownership transparent and justifiable, have the unintended potential to obscure risk. We outline ways in which risk in its institutional and personal contexts in children’s services may become less evident and tractable to moderation by the ICS systems that seek this very purpose. In doing so we consider the balance between professional trust and system confidence and consider whether the time has come to shift the balance back to the former if we are to re-engage more fully with the occupation’s humane mission.

Keywords

child protection ICS risk technology trust

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aas

(2005). Sentencing in the age of information: From Faust to Macintosh. London: Glasshouse Press.

Alexander

(2009). Caring, mutuality and reciprocity in social worker–client relationships. Journal of Social Work, 9(1), 5–22.

Beck

(1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London: SAGE.

Bijan

King

(2008). Enacting computer workaround practices within a medication dispensing system. European Journal of Information Systems, 17(3), 264–278.

Billig

Sabucedo

J. M.

(1994). Rhetorical and ideological dimensions of common sense. In: Siegfried

(Ed.), The status of common sense in psychology (pp. 121–145). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.

Blau

(1960). Orientations towards clients in a public welfare agency. Administrative Science Quarterly, 5(3), 341–361.

Broadhurst

Wastell

White

Hall

Peckover

Thompson

Pithouse

Dolores

(2009). Performing initial assessment: Identifying the latent conditions for error in local authority children’s services. British Journal of Social Work, Advance Access, doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcn162.

Bryman

(2004). Social research methods (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Cleaver

Walker

Scott

Ward

Pithouse

(2008). The integrated children’s system: Enhancing social work and inter-agency practice. London: Jessica Kingsley.

10.

Collins

Evans

(2007). Rethinking expertise. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

11.

Department for Children, Schools and Families. (2009a). Contactpoint to start national rollout. London: DCSF, retrieved from: http://www.dcsf.gov.uk/pns/DisplayPN.cgi?pn_id=2009_0210.

12.

Department for Children, Schools and Families. (2009b). Government commitment to delivering Laming recommendations. London: DCSF, retrieved from: http://www.dcsf.gov.uk/pns/DisplayPN.cgi?pn_id=2009_0052.

13.

Department of Health. (2000). Framework for the assessment of children in need and their families. London: The Stationery Office.

14.

Edwards

Levi

(2008). Researching the organisation of serious crimes. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 8(4), 363–388.

15.

Engel

Schutt

(2005). The practice of research in social work. London: SAGE.

16.

Furedi

(2009). Precautionary culture and the rise of possibilistic risk assessment. Erasmus Law Review, 2(2), 197–219.

17.

Garboden

(2010). Eileen Munro must cut red tape, improve IT and build confidence. Retrieved 13 July 2010 from: http://www.communitycare.co.uk/Articles/2010/06/15/114716/munros-brief-will-consider-hackney-model-of-social-work.htm.

18.

Giddens

(1990). The consequences of modernity. Cambridge: Polity.

19.

Hall

Slembrouck

Sarangi

(2006). Language practices in social work: Categorisation and accountability in child welfare. London: Routledge.

20.

Harrison

Smith

(2004). Trust and moral motivation: Redundant resources in health and social care?. Policy and Politics, 32(3), 371–386.

21.

Hart

Michie

Cooke

(2007). Precision of actuarial risk assessment instruments: Evaluating the margins of error of group v individual predictions of violence. British Journal of Psychiatry, 190(49), 60–65.

22.

Horlick-Jones

(2005a). Informal logics of risk: Contingency and modes of practical reasoning. Journal of Risk Research, 8(3), 253–272.

23.

Horlick-Jones

(2005b). On ‘risk work’: Professional discourse, accountability, and everyday action. Health, Risk and Society, 7(3), 293–307.

24.

House of Commons Education and Skills Committee. (2005). Every child matters. Ninth Report of Session 2004–05. Volume I. London: The Stationery Office.

25.

Howe

(1993). Child abuse and neglect: Attachment, development and intervention. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

26.

Howe

(2008). The emotionally intelligent social worker. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

27.

Hudson

(2005). Information sharing and children’s services reform in England: Can legislation change practice?. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 19(6), 537–546.

28.

Kemshall

(2000). Conflicting knowledges on risk: The case of risk knowledge in the probation service. Health, Risk and Society, 2(2), 143–158.

29.

Kemshall

(2001). Risk assessment and management of known sexual and dangerous offenders. Policing and Reducing Crime Unit, Paper 140, Home Office, London.

30.

Kemshall

(2002). Risk, Social Policy and Welfare. Buckingham: Open University Press.

31.

Kemshall

Maguire

(2001). Public protection, partnership and risk penality: The multi-agency risk management of sexual and violent offenders. Punishment and Society, 3(2), 237–264.

32.

Kemshall

Maguire

(2002). Community justice, risk management and the role of multi-agency public protection panels. British Journal of Community Justice, 1(1), 11–28.

33.

Kemshall

Parton

Walsh

Waterson

(1997). Concepts of risk in relation to organizational structure and functioning within the personal social services and probation. Social Policy and Administration, 31(3), 213–232.

34.

Klerks

(2007). Methodological aspects of the Dutch national threat assessment. Trends in Organized Crime, 10(4), 91–101.

35.

Laming, Lord (2003). The Victoria Climbie inquiry: Report of an inquiry by Lord Laming, Cm 5730. London: The Stationery Office.

36.

Laming, Lord (2009). The protection of children in England: A progress report. London: House of Commons, The Stationery Office.

37.

Lightfoot

(2008). At risk from the register? Education Guardian, 24 March, p. 1.

38.

Littlechild

(2008). Child protection social work: Risks of fears and fears of risks – Impossible tasks from impossible goals. Social Policy and Administration, 42(6), 662–675.

39.

Maguire

Kemshall

Noaks

Wincup

(2001). Risk management of sexual and violent offenders: The work of public protection panels. Police Research Series Paper 139, Home Office, London.

40.

Manning

(1977). Rules, colleagues and situationally justified actions. In: Blankenship

(Ed.), Colleagues in organizations: The social construction of professional work, New York: Wiley.

41.

Munro

(2004). A simpler way to understand the results of risk assessment instruments. LSE Research Articles Online. Retrieved from: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/archive/00000364.

42.

Munro

(2005). Improving practice: Child protection as a systems problem. Children and Youth Service Review, 27(4), 375–391.

43.

Munro

(2009). Managing societal and institutional risk in child protection. Risk Analysis, 29(7), 1015–1023.

44.

O’Malley

(2004). Risk and uncertainty. London: Glasshouse Press.

45.

O’Neil

(2002). The Reith Lectures: A question of trust, London, BBC, retrieved from: http://www.open2.net/reith2002/index.html.

46.

Parsons

(1969). Politics and social structure. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

47.

Parton

(2008). Changes in the form of knowledge in social work: From the ‘social’ to the ‘informational’?. British Journal of Social Work, 38(2), 275–277.

48.

Peckover

Hall

White

(2008a). From policy to practice: The implementation and negotiation of technologies in everyday child welfare. Children & Society. Advance Access doi: 10.1111/j.1099-0860.2008.00143.x.

49.

Peckover

White

Hall

(2008b). Making and managing electronic children: E.assessment in child welfare. Information, Communication and Society, 11(3), 375–394.

50.

Pithouse

(1985). Poor visibility: Case talk & collegial assessment in a social work office. Work & Organisations, 12(1), 77–89.

51.

Pithouse

Hall

Peckover

White

(2009). A tale of two CAFs: The impact of the electronic common assessment framework. British Journal of Social Work. Advance Access doi:10.1111/j.1099-0860.2008.00143.x.

52.

Reason

(1990). Human error. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

53.

Rose

(1993). Government authority and expertise in advanced liberalism. Economy and Society, 22(3), 283–300.

54.

Rothstein

Huber

Gaskell

(2006). A theory of risk colonisation: The spiralling regulatory logics of societal and institutional risk. Economy and Society, 35(1), 91–112.

55.

Schlonsky

Wagner

(2005). The next step: Integrating actuarial risk assessment and clinical judgement into an evidence-based practice framework in CPS case management. Children and Youth Services Review, 27(4), 409–427.

56.

Shaw

Bell

Sinclair

Sloper

Mitchell

Dyson

Clayden

Rafferty

(2009). An exemplary scheme? An evaluation of the integrated children’s system. British Journal of Social Work, Advance Access doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcp040.

57.

Smith

(2001). Trust and confidence: Possibilities for social work in high modernity. British Journal of Social Work, 31(2), 287–306.

58.

Sparrow

(2008). The character of harms. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

59.

Taylor-Gooby

Zinn

(2006). Current directions in risk research: New developments in psychology and sociology. Risk Analysis, 26(2), 397–411.

60.

Van Duyne

P. C.

Vander Beken

(2008). The incantations of the EU organised crime policy-making. Crime, Law and Social Change, 51(2), 261–281.

61.

Wastell

White

Broadhurst

Hall

Peckover

Pithouse

(forthcoming). Children’s services in the iron cage of performance management: Street level bureaucracy and the spectre of Švejkism. International Journal of Social Work.

62.

Webb

S. A.

(2004). Social work in a risk society: Social and political perspectives. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.