• Summary: This article describes how a reliance upon social and behavioral science research is the feature distinguishing modern professional social work from prior non-professional efforts at providing social care. A number of formal efforts that attempted to more closely link science and practice are described, including the empirical clinical practice movement, the empirically supported treatments initiative, and, most recently, evidence-based practice (EBP).
• Findings: EBP is correctly seen as a process of inquiry intended to help practitioners and their clients make important decisions about the services the clients receive. EBP is a process, a verb, not a noun. There is no such thing as evidence-based practices, since in EBP one decides what services to provide by taking into account not only research evidence but also client preferences and values, situational circumstances, professional ethics, the practitioner’s existing skills, and available resources.
• Applications: From this perspective it is a misuse of the term EBP to refer to specific interventions or assessment methods as evidence-based. At best, interventions or techniques may be labeled as empirically supported or research-supported. The current status of EBP within American social work is seen as healthy and growing, although misconceptions regarding this process are common.
Arnd-Caddigan, M., & Pozzuto, R. ( 2010). Evidence-based practice and the purpose of clinical social work. Smith College Studies in Social Work, 80, 35-52.
2.
Barker, R.L. (Ed.) (2003). The social work dictionary, 5th edn. Washington, DC: NASW.
3.
Barlow, D. (Ed.) (2008). Clinical handbook of psychological disorders. New York: Guilford.
4.
Bevir, M. ( 2002). Sidney Webb: Utilitarianism, positivism, and social democracy . Journal of Modern History, 74, 217-252.
5.
Bolland, K., & Atherton, C. ( 2002). Heuristics versus logical positivism: Solving the wrong problem. Families in Society, 83, 7-83.
6.
Bruno, F. ( 1936). The theory of social work. New York : Heath.
7.
Cheney, A.S. ( 1926). The nature and scope of social work. New York: D. C. Heath.
8.
Davies, H.T.O., Nutley, S.M., & Smith, P.C. ( 2000). What works: Evidence-based policy and practice in the public services. Bristol: The Policy Press.
9.
Eaton, J.W. ( 1956). Whence and whither social work: A sociological perspective . Social Work, 1(1), 11-26.
10.
Ellwood, C.A. ( 1918). Social facts and scientific social work. In Proceedings of the National Conference of Social Work. New York: National Conference of Social Work.
11.
Evidence-based Medicine Working Group. (1992 ) Evidence-based medicine: A new approach to teaching the practice of medicine. JAMA, 268, 2420-2425.
12.
Gambrill, E. ( 1999). Evidence-based practice: An alternative to authority-based practice. Families in Society, 80, 341-350.
13.
Germaine, C. ( 1970). Casework and science: A historical encounter. In R. Roberts & R. Nee (Eds.), Theories of social casework (pp. 3-32). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
14.
Graham, J.R. ( 1992). The Haven, 1878-1930: A Toronto charity’s transition from a religious to a professional ethos. Histoire Sociale/Social History, 25, 283-306.
15.
Graham, J.R., Al-Krenawi, A., & Bradshaw, C. ( 2000). The Social Work Research Group/ NASW Research Section/Council on Social Work Research: 1949-1965: An emerging research identity in the American profession. Research on Social Work Practice, 10, 622-643.
16.
Guyatt, G., & Rennie, D. (Eds.) (2002). Users’ guides to the medical literature: Essentials of evidence-based clinical practice. Chicago, IL: JAMA.
17.
Halfpenny, P. ( 1982). Positivism and sociology: Explaining social life. Boston, MA: Allen & Unwin.
18.
Haskell, T.L. ( 1993). The emergence of professional social science: The American Social Science Association and the nineteenth century crisis of authority . Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
19.
Howard, M.O., McMillen, J.C., & Pollio, D.E. ( 2003). Teaching evidence-based practice: Toward a new paradigm for social work education. Research on Social Work Practice , 13, 234-259.
20.
International Federation of Social Workers. ( 2000). Definition of social work. Retrieved 9 December 2008 from http://www.ifsw.org/en/f38000138.html.
21.
Jayaratne, S., & Levy, R.L. ( 1979). Empirical clinical practice. New York : Columbia. Karpf, M.J. (1931). The scientific basis of social work. New York: Columbia University Press.
22.
Kovner, A.R., Elton, J.J., & Billings, J. ( 2000). Evidence-based management. Frontiers of Health Services Management, 16(4), 3-46.
23.
Littell, J.H., Corcoran, J., & Pillai, V. ( 2008). Systematic reviews and meta-analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
24.
Macdonald, G. ( 1998). Promoting evidence-based practice in child protection . Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 31, 71-85.
25.
McHugh, R.K., & Barlow, D.H. ( 2010). The dissemination and implementation of evidence-based psychological treatments: A review of current efforts. American Psychologist, 65, 73-84.
26.
Nathan, P.E., & Gorman, J.M. ( 2007). A guide to treatments that work, 3rd edn. New York: Oxford University Press.
27.
National Association of Social Workers (1955 ). Bylaws of the National Association of Social Workers. New York: Author.
28.
Niebuhr, R. ( 1932). The contribution of religion to social work. New York: Columbia University Press.
29.
Pickering, M. ( 1993). Auguste Comte: An intellectual biography (Volume 1). New York: Cambridge University Press.
30.
Plath, D. ( 2006). Evidence-based practice: Current issues and future directions . Australian Social Work, 59, 56-72.
31.
Reid, W.R. ( 1994). The empirical practice movement. Social Service Review, 68, 165-184.
32.
Reynolds, B.C. ( 1942). Learning and teaching in the practice of social work . New York: Farrar & Reinhart .
33.
Reynolds, B.C. ( 1991). An uncharted journey. Silver Spring, MD: NASW Press (original work published in 1963).
34.
Roberts, A.R. (Ed.) (2009). Social workers’ desk reference, 2nd edn. New York: Oxford University Press.
35.
Rubin, A., & Babbie, E. (Eds.) (2008). Research methods for social work, 6th edn. Belmont, CA: Thomson.
36.
Sackett, D.L., Straus, S.E., Richardson, W.S., Rosenberg, W., & Haynes, R.B. ( 1997). Evidence-based medicine: How to practice and teach EBM . New York: Churchill Livingstone .
37.
Salomon, A. ( 1937). Education for social work: A sociological interpretation based on an international survey. Zurich: Verlag fur recht und gesellschaft.
38.
Smith, D. ( 1987). The limits of positivism in social work research. British Journal of Social Work, 17, 401-416.
39.
Straus, E., Richardson, S.W., Glasziou, P., & Haynes, R.B. ( 2005). Evidence-based medicine: How to practice and teach EBM . New York: Elsevier.
40.
Strode, J. ( 1940). An introduction to social work. New York: Harper and Brothers.
41.
Task Force on the Promotion and Dissemination of Psychological Procedures . (1993). Retrieved from: http://www.apa.org/divisions/div12/est/chamble2.pdf .
42.
Thyer, B.A. ( 2008a). The quest for evidence-based practice: We are all positivists!Research on Social Work Practice, 18, 339-345.
43.
Thyer, B.A. ( 2008b). Evidence-based macro practice: Addressing the challenges and opportunities. Journal of Evidence-based Social Work, 5(3-4), 1-20.
44.
Thyer, B.A. ( 2009). Evidence-based practice, science, and social work. In A.R. Roberts (Ed.), Social worker’s desk reference (pp. 115-120). New York: Oxford University Press.
45.
Todd, A.J. ( 1920). The scientific spirit and social work. New York: Macmillan.
46.
Toynbee, A. ( 1912). Lectures on the industrial revolution of the eighteenth century in England. London: Longmans, Green.
47.
Webb, S. ( 2002). Some considerations on the validity of evidence-based practice in social work. British Journal of Social Work, 31, 57-79.
