• Summary: The purported purpose of literature in the helping professions is to contribute to helping clients. Most authors who prepare articles are employed in universities and colleges which claim to value the pursuit of truth. Yet the professional literature is rife with inflated claims of what ‘we know’ and ‘do not know’ as well as distortions of ideas and issues. Nowhere is this more obvious than in the steady misrepresentation of the process and philosophy of evidence-based practice (EBP). Authors have exercised their discretion to misinform rather than to inform readers about this new idea that is so compatible with social work values and obligations described in professional codes of ethics (for example, to involve clients as informed participants and to be competent) and so sensitive to practitioners’ need for tools that enable them to meet ethical obligations in a context of uncertainty and lack of resources when making life-affecting decisions.
• Findings: Evidence-based practice was developed to help practitioners to deal with the inherent uncertainty of practice in an informed, accountable way, paying attention to the need to develop tools to enable this process, such as the Cochrane and Campbell data bases of systematic reviews related to specific clinical and policy questions as well as constraints such as dysfunctional organizational practices and lack of resources. The importance of considering the unique circumstances and characteristics of each client, including their values and expectations, as well as the limitations of published research (e.g. inflated claims of effectiveness and hiding of disliked alternative views) is highlighted. Decision-making is viewed as a complex process requiring individual tailoring of decisions on the part of practitioners as well as skeptical appraisal of claims in published research. This process and philosophy shares core values promoted by social work. The process and philosophy of evidence-based practice as described in original sources is not presented in the majority of publications in social work. This makes it impossible for readers to understand the original vision as well as recent developments in its application. Indeed, the five-step process involved in EBP described in original sources is typically not described, even in entire books on the subject. Given that new ideas may benefit clients, for example by enabling the honoring of ethical obligations and encouraging the development of tools that practitioners need to make informed (rather than misinformed or uninformed) decisions, this is a concerning lapse. Many authors have used their discretion to hide rather than to reveal this new idea and related developments, such as new ways to involve clients as informed participants. Reasons why are suggested, including the play of propaganda in the helping professions, the failure to read original sources, and a detachment from the needs of direct line staff and clients.
• Applications: This article suggests ethical obligations in exercising discretion when choosing how to describe new ideas (e.g. accurately or in a distorted form). The importance of reading original (rather than secondary) sources is emphasized.
Angell, M. ( 2009). Drug companies & doctors: A story of corruption. New York Review of Books, 1/15.
3.
Bauer, H.H. ( 2004). Science in the 21st century: Knowledge monopolies and research cartels. Journal of Scientific Exploration, 18(4), 643-660.
4.
Boyle, M. ( 2002). Schizophrenia: A scientific delusion? (2nd edn). London: Routledge .
5.
Brody, H. ( 2007). Hooked: Ethics, the medical profession and pharmaceutical industry. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
6.
Budd, K.S., Poindexter, L.M., Feliz, E.D., & Naik-Plan, A.T. (2001). Clinical assessment of parents in child protection cases: An empirical analysis. Law and Human Behavior, 25, 93-108.
7.
Bunge, M. ( 1984). What is pseudoscience? Skeptical Inquirer , 9(1), 36-47.
8.
Chalmers, I. ( 2004). Well informed uncertainties about the effects of treatments . British Medial Journal, 328, 475-476.
9.
Charlton, B.G. ( 2010). The cancer of bureaucracy: How it will destroy science, medicine, education; and eventually everything else. Medical Hypotheses, 74(6), 961-965.
10.
Conrad, P. ( 2007). The medicalization of society: On the transformation of human conditions into treatable disorders. Baltimore , MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
11.
Coombs, J.E., & Nimmo, D. ( 1993). The new propaganda: The dictatorship of palaver in contemporary politics. New York: Longman.
12.
Cosgrove, L., Bursztajin, H.J., Krimsky, S., Anaya, J., & Walker, J. ( 2009). Conflicts of interest and disclosure in the American Psychiatric Association’s clinical practice guidelines. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 78, 228-232.
13.
Cunningham, S.B. ( 2002). The idea of propaganda: A reconstruction. Westport, CT: Praeger.
14.
Dawes, R.M. ( 2001). Everyday irrationality: How pseudoscientists, lunatics and the rest of us systematically fail to think rationally. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
15.
DePanfilis, D. ( 2003). Review of IAIU investigations of suspected child abuse and neglect. In DYFS out-of-home care settings in New Jersey . Final Report. Baltimore, MD: School of Social Work, University of Maryland.
16.
Double, D.B. ( 2006). Critical psychiatry: The limits of madness. New York: Palgrave.
17.
Dunning, D., Heath, C., & Suls, J.M. ( 2004). Flawed self-assessment. Implications for health, education and the work place. Psychological Science in the Public Interest , 5, 69-106.
18.
Ellul, J. ( 1965). Propaganda: The formation of men’s attitudes. New York: Vintage.
19.
Ely, J.W., Osheroff, J.A., Ebell, M.H., Chambliss, M.L., Vinson, D.C., Stevermer, J.J., & Pifer, E.A. ( 2002). Obstacles to answering doctors’ questions about patient care with evidence: Qualitative study. British Medical Journal, 324, 711-718.
20.
Friedson, E. ( 2001). Professionalism: The third logic. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
21.
Gagnon, M.-A. ( 2010). Veblenian analysis of Big Pharma’s intangible assets: Capitalizing medical bias. Presented at Association for Institutional Thought, Reno, NV, April.
22.
Gambrill, E. ( 2005). Critical thinking in clinical practice: Improving the quality of judgments and decisions (2nd edn). New York: John Wiley.
23.
Gambrill, E. ( 2006). Evidence-based practice and policy: Choices ahead. Research on Social Work Practice, 16, 338-357.
24.
Gambrill, E. ( 2010). Evidence-informed practice: Antidote to propaganda in the helping professions?Research on Social Work Practice , 20, 302-320.
25.
Gambrill, E., & Gibbs, L.E. ( 2009). Critical thinking for the helping professions: A skills-based workbook (3rd edn). New York : Oxford University Press.
26.
Gandhi, A.G., Murphy-Graham, E., Petrosino, A., Chrismer, S.S., & Weiss, C.H. ( 2007). The devil is in the details. Evaluation Review, 31, 43-74.
27.
Gibbs, L., & Gambrill, E. ( 2002). Evidence-based practice: Counter-arguments to objections . Research on Social Work Practice, 12, 452-476.
28.
Gigerenzer, G. ( 2002). Calculated risks: How to know when numbers deceive you . New York: Simon & Schuster .
29.
Gorman, D.M., & Huber Jr, J.C. (2009). The social construction of ‘evidence-based’ drug prevention programs: A reanalysis of data from the drug abuse resistance education (DARE) program. Evaluation Review, 33(4), 396-414.
30.
Gray, J.A.M. ( 1997). Evidence-based health care: How to make health policy and management decisions. New York: Churchill Livingstone.
31.
Gray, J.A.M. ( 2001a). Evidence-based medicine for professionals. In A. Edwards, & G. Elwyn (Eds.), Evidence-based patient choice: Inevitable or impossible? (pp. 19-33). New York: Oxford University Press.
32.
Gray, J.A.M. ( 2001b). Evidence-based health care: How to make health policy and management decisions. New York: Churchill Livingston.
33.
Gray, M., Plath, D., & Webb, S.A. ( 2009). Evidence-based social work: A critical stance. New York: Routledge.
34.
Greenhalgh, T., Robert, G., Macfarlane, F., Bate, P., & Kyriakidou, O. (2004). Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: Systematic review and recommendations. The Milbank Quarterly, 83, 581-629.
35.
Grilli, R., Magrini, N., Penna, A., Mura, G., & Liberati, A. ( 2000). Practice guidelines developed by specialty societies: The need for a critical appraisal. Lancet, 355, 103-106.
36.
Hastie, R., & Dawes, R. ( 2001). Rational choice in an uncertain world: The psychology of judgment and decision making. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
37.
Haynes, R.B., Devereaux, P.J., & Guyatt, G.H. ( 2002). Editorial. Clinical expertise in the era of evidence-based medicine and patient choice. ACP Journal Club, 13(A11), 1-7.
38.
Henriksen, K., & Dayton, E. ( 2006). Public policy and research agenda. Organizational silence and hidden threats to patient safety. Health Research and Educational Trust, 1539-1554 (DOI:10. 1111/j. 1475-6773. 2006. 00564.).
39.
Horowitz, A.V., & Wakefield, J.C. (2007). The loss of sadness: How psychiatry transformed normal sorrow into depressive disorder. New York: Oxford University Press.
40.
Illouz, E. ( 2008). Saving the modern soul: Therapy, emotions, and the culture of self-help. Berkeley: University of California Press.
41.
Imel, Z.E., Wampold, B.E., Miller, S.D., & Fleming, R.R. ( 2008). Distinctions without a difference: Direct comparisons of psychotherapies for alcohol use disorders. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 22, 533-543.
42.
Ioannidis, J.P.A. ( 2005). Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Medicine, 2, e124.
43.
Jacobson, J. W., Foxx, R. M., & Mulick, J. A. (Eds.). (2005). Controversial therapies for developmental disabilities: Fad, fashion, and science in professional practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
44.
Kassirer, J.P. ( 2005). On the take: How medicine’s complicity with big business can endanger your health. New York: Oxford University Press.
45.
Katz, J. ( 2002). The silent world of doctor and patient. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
46.
Kazdin, A. E., & Weisz, J. R. (Eds.) (2003). Evidence-based psychotherapies for children and adolescents. New York: Guilford.
47.
Koh, G., Khoo, H.E., Wong, M.L., & Koh, D. ( 2008). The effects of problem-based learning during medical school on physician competency: A systematic review. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 178, 34-41.
48.
Kuhn, T.S. ([ 1962] 1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd edn). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
49.
LaCasse, J.R., & Gomory, T. ( 2003). Is graduate social work education promoting a critical approach to mental health practice? Journal of Social Work Education, 39, 383-408.
50.
Lilienfeld, S. O., Lynn, S. J., & Lohr, J. M. (Eds.) (2003). Science and pseudoscience in clinical psychology . New York: The Guilford Press.
51.
Littell, J.H. ( 2006). The case for multisystemic therapy: Evidence or orthodoxy ? Children and Youth Services Review, 28, 458-472.
52.
Littell, J.H., Popa, M., & Forsythe, B. ( 2005). Multisystemic therapy for social, emotional, and behavioral problems in youth aged 10-17 (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 4, 2005. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons. Also available at: http://www.campbellcollaboration.org/doc-pdf/Mst_Littell_Review.pdf . Loeske, D.R. (1999). Thinking about social problems: An introduction to constructionist perspectives. New York : Aldine de Gruyter.
53.
McCabe, D.P., & Castel, A.D. ( 2008). Seeing is believing: The effect of brain images on judgment of scientific reasoning. Cognition, 107, 343-352.
54.
McCord, J. ( 2003). Cures that harm: Unanticipated outcomes of crime prevention programs. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 587, 16-30. Moncrieff, J. (2008). The myth of the chemical cure: A critique of psychiatric drug treatment. New York: Palgrave.
55.
Moynihan, R., & Cassels, A. ( 2005). Selling sickness: How the world’s biggest pharmaceutical companies are turning us all into patients. New York: Nation Books.
56.
Munro, E. ( 1996). Avoidable and unavoidable mistakes in child protection work. British Journal of Social Work, 26, 89-105.
57.
National Association of Social Workers. (1999 ) Code of ethics. Silver Spring, MD: NASW(Adopted 8/15/96.).
58.
Nickerson, R.S. ( 1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomena in many guises . Review of General Psychology, 2, 175-220.
59.
Norcross, J. C., Beutler, L. E., & Levant, R. F. (Eds.) (2006). Evidence-based practices in mental health: Debate and dialogue on the fundamental questions. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
60.
O’Conner, A.M., Bennett, C.L., Stacey, D., Barry, M., Col, N.F., Eden, K.B. et al. (2009). Decision aides for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews , Issue 3. Art. No.: CD001431. DOI: 10.1002/ 14651858.CD001431.
61.
Otto, H. U., Polutta, A., & Zielgar, H. (Eds.) (2009). Evidence-based practice - Modernizing the knowledge base of social work?. Opladen and Farmington Hills, MI : Barbara Burdrich Publishers.
62.
Paul, R. ( 1993). Critical thinking: What every person needs to survive in a rapidly changing world (3rd edn). Dillon Beach, CA: Foundation for Critical Thinking (www.criticalthinking.org).
63.
Paul, R.W., & Elder, L. ( 2004). Critical thinking: Tools for taking charge of your professional and personal life. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
64.
Pelton, L.H. ( 2009). Informing child welfare: The promise and limits of empirical research. In D. Lindsey & A. Shlonsky (Eds.), Child welfare research: Advances for practice and policy (pp. 25-48). New York: Oxford University Press.
65.
Petrosino, A., Turpin-Petrosino, C., & Buehler, J. ( 2003). Scared straight and other juvenile awareness programs for preventing juvenile delinquency: A systematic review of the randomized experimental evidence. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 589, 41-62.
66.
Phillips, D.C. ( 1992). The social scientist’s bestiary: A guide to fabled threats to, and defenses of, naturalistic social studies. New York: Pergamon.
67.
Pignotti, M., & Thyer, B.A. ( 2009). Use of novel unsupported and empirically supported therapies by licensed clinical social workers: An exploratory study. Social Work Research, 33, 5-17.
68.
Popper, K. ( 1972). Conjectures and refutations: The growth of scientific knowledge (4th edn). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
69.
Popper, K.R. ( 1994). The myth of the framework In defense of science and rationality, Ed. M. A. Notturno.New York: Routledge.
70.
Proctor, R. N., & Schiebinger, L. (Eds.) (2008). Agnotology: The making & unmaking of ignorance. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
71.
Rank, H. ( 1984). The pep talk: How to analyze political language. Park Forest, IL: Counter-Propaganda Press.
72.
Rubin, A., & Parrish, D. ( 2007). Problematic phrases in the conclusions of published outcome studies: Implications for evidence-based outcome. Research on Social Work Education, 17(3), 334-347.
73.
Sackett, D.L., Richardson, W.S., Rosenberg, W., & Haynes, R.B. ( 1997). Evidence-based medicine: How to practice and teach EBM . New York: Churchill Livingston . Skrabanek, P., & McCormick , J. (1998). Follies and fallacies in medicine (3rd edn). Whithorn: Tarragon Press.
74.
Stoesz, D., Karger, M.J., & Carrillo, T. ( 2010). A dream deferred: How social work education lost its way and what can be done. New Brunswick, NJ: Aldine Transaction.
75.
Straus, S.E., Richardson, W.C., Glasziou, P., & Haynes, R.B. ( 2005). Evidence-based medicine: How to practice and teach EBM (3rd edn). New York: Churchill Livingston. Szasz, T.S. (1994). Cruel compassion: Psychiatric control of society’s unwanted. New York: John Wiley.
76.
Task Force on Psychological Intervention Guidelines. ( 1995) Template for developing guidelines: Interventions for mental disorders and psychological aspects of physical disorders. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association .
77.
Thornley, B., & Adams, C. ( 1998). Content and quality of 2000 controlled trials in schizophrenia over 50 years. British Medical Journal, 317, 1181-1184.
78.
Veblen, T. ([ 1918] 1993). The higher learning in America: A memorandum on the conduct of universities by business men. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
79.
Walton, D. ( 2008). Informal logic: A pragmatic approach (2nd edn). New York: Cambridge University Press.
80.
Wampold, B.E., Imel, Z.E., & Miller, S.D. ( 2009). Barriers to the dissemination of empirically supported treatments: Matching messages to the evidence. The Behavior Therapist, 10, 144-155.
81.
Wennberg, J.E. ( 2002). Unwarranted variations in healthcare delivery: Implications for academic medical centres. British Medical Journal, 325, 961-964.
82.
Wilkes, M.S., & Hoffman, J.R. ( 2001). An innovative approach to educating medical students about pharmaceutical promotion. Academic Medicine, 76, 1271-1277.
