This study develops and validates a measurement scale for Augmented Reality Entertainment Experience (AREE) and examines its influence on tourist satisfaction, destination image, and revisit intentions among young museum travellers. The research distinguishes AREE from traditional AR applications by emphasizing its entertainment-driven attributes and their impact on tourism experiences. A survey was conducted among 314 young tourists who engaged with projection-based AR experiences at three major museums in India. The study employed Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) for validating the AREE scale followed by Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) to test the hypothesized relationships. The findings reveal that AREE significantly enhances tourist satisfaction and revisit intentions, while its direct impact on destination image is insignificant. Instead, satisfaction fully mediates the relationship between AREE and destination image, underscoring the importance of emotionally engaging AR experiences in shaping perceptions. Furthermore, destination image does not directly impact revisit intentions, suggesting that experiential factors may play a more dominant role in revisitation decisions for young travelers. The study provides theoretical contributions by extending the experience economy and self-determination theory to AR-driven tourism experiences, while practical implications highlight the need for strategic integration of AR in destination marketing to enhance visitor engagement and loyalty.
AbubakarAMIlkanMMeshall Al-TalR, et al. (2017) eWOM, revisit intention, destination trust and gender. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management31: 220–227.
2.
AhmadHButtAMuzaffarA (2023) Travel before you actually travel with augmented reality – role of augmented reality in future destination. Current Issues in Tourism26(17): 2845–2862.
3.
AlcañizEBSánchez GarcíaISanz BlasS (2009) The functional-psychological continuum in the cognitive image of a destination: a confirmatory analysis. Tourism Management30(5): 715–723.
4.
BartaSGurreaRFlaviánC (2025) Augmented reality experiences: consumer‐centered augmented reality framework and research agenda. Psychology and Marketing42(2): 634–650.
5.
BatatW (2020) How can art museums develop new business opportunities?Young Consumers21(1): 109–131.
6.
BimberOFröhlichBSchmalstiegD, et al. (2002) The virtual showcase. In: ACM SIGGRAPH 2002 Conference Abstracts and Applications, pp. 80.
7.
BonaciniE (2024) How Could Museums Improve Their Digital Collections for New Online Audiences? Some Suggestions from an Empirical Survey with Gen-Z Students. University of Bari “Aldo Moro”.
8.
BonelECapestroMDi MariaE (2023) How COVID-19 impacted cultural consumption: an explorative analysis of Gen Z’s digital museum experiences. Italian Journal of Marketing2023(2): 135–160.
9.
CesárioVNisiV (2022) Designing with teenagers: a teenage perspective on enhancing mobile museum experiences. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction33: 100454.
10.
ChenZ (2023) Theoretical development of the tourist experience: a future perspective. Tourism Recreation Research50: 1–15.
11.
ChenSXuH (2020) The moral gaze in commercialized dark tourism. Current Issues in Tourism24(15): 2167–2186.
12.
ChylinskiMHellerJHilkenT, et al. (2020) Augmented reality marketing: a technology-enabled approach to situated customer experience. Australasian Marketing Journal28(4): 374–384.
13.
Ch’ngECaiSFengP, et al. (2023) Social augmented reality: communicating via cultural heritage. Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage16(2): 1–26.
14.
CikiKDKizanlikliMMTanriverdiH (2024) Antecedents of cave visitors’ revisit intentions in the context of self-determination theory: a case study on Dupnisa Cave visitors in Turkey. Current Issues in Tourism28: 1–6.
15.
CoelhoMDFGoslingMDSAlmeidaASAD (2018) Tourism experiences: core processes of memorable trips. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management37: 11–22.
16.
CollierJE (2020) Applied structural equation modeling using AMOS. Basic to Advanced Techniques.
17.
CranmerEEtom DieckMCJungT (2023) The role of augmented reality for sustainable development: evidence from cultural heritage tourism. Tourism Management Perspectives49: 101196.
18.
DeVellisRFThorpeCT (2022). Scale Development Fifth Edition.
19.
DieckMCTJungT (2018) A theoretical model of mobile augmented reality acceptance in urban heritage tourism. Current Issues in Tourism21(2): 154–174.
20.
DimockM (2019) Defining generations: where Millennials end and Generation Z begins. Pew Research Center17(1): 1–7.
21.
DuanYWuJ (2024) Sport tourist perceptions of destination image and revisit intentions: an adaption of Mehrabian-Russell’s environmental psychology model. Heliyon10(11): e31810.
22.
EckTAnSJiangL, et al. (2024) Enhancing memorable volunteer tourism experiences through mindfulness: a case of short‐term volunteer tourists. International Journal of Tourism Research26(5): e2677.
23.
FeitosaWRBarbosaR (2020) Generation Z and technologies on museums – its influence on perceptions about Quality, Arousal and E-WOM Intentions. Marketing & Tourism Review5(2): 1–32.
24.
FieldA (2019). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics.
25.
Florido-BenítezL (2023) Film-induced tourism – the impact the of animation, cartoon, superhero and fantasy movies. Tourism Review78(5): 1298–1314.
26.
FokkemaMGreiffS (2017) How performing PCA and CFA on the same data equals trouble. European Journal of Psychological Assessment33(6): 399–402.
27.
FornellCLarckerDF (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research18(1): 39–50.
28.
FrancisTHoefelF (2018). ‘True Gen’: generation Z and its implications for companies.
29.
GencVBilgihanAGulertekin GencS, et al. (2023) Seeing history come to life with augmented reality: the museum experience of generation Z in Göbeklitepe. Journal of Tourism and Cultural Change21(6): 657–676.
30.
GengLLiYZhangY, et al. (2024) Advancing tourism recovery through virtual tourism marketing: an integrated approach of uses and gratifications theory and attachment to VR. Current Issues in Tourism27(2): 234–250.
31.
Gómez-GarcíaSMoreno-CantanoA-CQuevedo-RedondoR (2024) Gaming the conflict: Fursan Al-Aqsa’s narrative of the Israeli-Palestinian struggle and its reception through moral disengagement. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies.
32.
HabibI (2020) Jallianwala Bagh massacre. Social Scientist47(5): 3–8.
HenselerJRingleCMSarstedtM (2016) Testing measurement invariance of composites using partial least squares. International Marketing Review33(3): 405–431.
35.
HolleranMHolleranS (2024) Resisting dark tourism: northern Cyprus’s ‘ghost city’ of Varosha. City28(5–6): 1066–1078.
36.
HuLBentlerPM (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal6(1): 1–55.
37.
HuRWangCZhangT, et al. (2021) Applying augmented reality (AR) technologies in theatrical performances in theme parks: a transcendent experience perspective. Tourism Management Perspectives40: 100889.
38.
HuangHRuanW-QLiY-Q, et al. (2025) Perceived responsibility or emotional blackmail? The impact of ethical voice on tourists’ cultural heritage conservation commitment. Journal of Travel Research00472875251349237.
39.
JiangSScottNTaoL (2019) Antecedents of augmented reality experiences: potential tourists to Shangri-La Potatso National Park, China. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research24(10): 1034–1045.
40.
JiangXQinJGaoJ, et al. (2022) The mediation of perceived risk’s impact on destination image and travel intention: an empirical study of Chengdu, China during COVID-19. PLoS One17(1): e0261851.
41.
JiangSMoyleBYungR, et al. (2023a) Augmented reality and the enhancement of memorable tourism experiences at heritage sites. Current Issues in Tourism26(2): 242–257.
42.
JiangXDengNZhengS (2023b) Understanding the core technological features of virtual and augmented reality in tourism: a qualitative and quantitative review. Current Issues in Tourism26(21): 3444–3464.
43.
JooKKimHMHwangJ (2023) A study on the experience economy examining a robot service in the restaurant industry based on demographic characteristics. Sustainability15(14): 10827.
44.
JungTtom DieckMCLeeH, et al. (2016) Effects of virtual reality and augmented reality on visitor experiences in museum. In: Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2016. Springer International Publishing, pp. 621–635.
45.
KawadaHNaoiT (2022) Impact of incomplete planned experiences on tourist satisfaction: a case of Tokyo Disneyland. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research27(7): 744–762.
46.
KimJ-H (2014) The antecedents of memorable tourism experiences: the development of a scale to measure the destination attributes associated with memorable experiences. Tourism Management44: 34–45.
47.
KimJ-H (2018) The impact of memorable tourism experiences on loyalty behaviors: the mediating effects of destination image and satisfaction. Journal of Travel Research57(7): 856–870.
48.
KimY (2024) Exploring the interplay of psychological need satisfaction, well-being, and behavioral intentions in tourism: a self-determination theory perspective. Journal of Travel Research65: 222–241.
49.
KimYRLiuAStienmetzJ, et al. (2022) Visitor flow spillover effects on attraction demand: a spatial econometric model with multisource data. Tourism Management88: 104432.
50.
KolsteeYEckWV (2011) The augmented Van Gogh's: augmented reality experiences for museum visitors. In: 2011 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality - Arts, Media, and Humanities. Basel, Switzerland, pp. 49–52.
51.
LeeSWXueK (2020) A model of destination loyalty: integrating destination image and sustainable tourism. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research25(4): 393–408.
52.
LeeH-KParkSLeeY (2022) A proposal of virtual museum metaverse content for the MZ generation. Digital Creativity33(2): 79–95.
LiTLiuFSoutarGN (2021) Experiences, post-trip destination image, satisfaction and loyalty: a study in an ecotourism context. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management19: 100547.
55.
LiSLyuTParkS, et al. (2023) Spillover effects in destination advertising: an electroencephalography study. Annals of Tourism Research102: 103623.
56.
LiangS-HLaiIKW (2022) Tea tourism: designation of origin brand image, destination image, and visit intention. Journal of Vacation Marketing29(3): 409–427.
57.
LimLGohW-YDowningM, et al. (2021) A spatial music listening experience in augmented reality. In: Adjunct Proceedings of the 34th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, pp. 23–25.
58.
LimontaRRuiz-MorenoFAliAA, et al. (2024) The Manta mystique: destination image and its effect on tourist citizenship behavior and willingness to sacrifice. Journal of Vacation Marketing13567667241274548.
59.
LongoMCFaraciR (2023) Next-generation Museum: a metaverse journey into culture. Sinergie Italian Journal of Management41(1): 147–176.
60.
LuongTB (2023) Eco-destination image, place attachment, and behavioral intention: the moderating role of eco-travel motivation. Journal of Ecotourism23(4): 631–656.
61.
ManthiouA(Ally) LeeS(Rebecca) TangLChiangL (2014) The experience economy approach to festival marketing: vivid memory and attendee loyalty. Journal of Services Marketing28(1): 22–35.
62.
MarascoABuonincontriPvan NiekerkMOrlowskiMOkumusF (2018) Exploring the role of next-generation virtual technologies in destination marketing. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management9: 138–148.
63.
MathewPVCabralCMohandasNP (2024) Influence of responsible tourism practices on the destination perceptions of tourists. International Journal of Tourism Research26(4): e2692.
64.
MorrisonAMCheahJ-HKumarR (2024) A destination performance measurement framework: exploring the relationships among performance criteria and revisit intentions. Current Issues in Tourism. doi: 10.1080/13683500.2024.2309149.
NganHFB(Clara) LeiWS (2024) Examining the effects of augmented reality on sport event experiences and revisit intention: a comparative analysis between AR and non-AR users. Current Issues in Tourism28: 1–14.
67.
NikolakopoulouVPrintezisPManiatisVKontizasDVosinakisSChatzigrigoriouPKoutsabasisP (2022) Conveying intangible cultural heritage in museums with interactive storytelling and projection mapping: the case of the mastic villages. Heritage5(2): 1024–1049.
68.
PedersenIGaleNMirza-BabaeiPReidS (2017) More than meets the eye. Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage10(2): 1–15.
69.
PineJBGilmoreJH (2011). The experience economy.
70.
PrandiCMelisAPrandiniMDelnevoGMontiLMirriSSalomoniP (2019) Gamifying cultural experiences across the urban environment. Multimedia Tools and Applications78(3): 3341–3364.
RasoolimaneshSMCheeSYAri RagavanN (2023) Tourists’ perceptions of the sustainability of destination, satisfaction, and revisit intention. Tourism Recreation Research50: 1–20.
73.
RazG (2022) Rage against the empathy machine revisited: the ethics of empathy-related affordances of virtual reality. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies28(5): 1457–1475.
74.
SethiCK (2019) This Freedom Fighters’ Memorial is Providing Cheer to People & Moolah to Punjab Govt. ThePrint.
75.
SharmaA (2018) In a First, Attari Border Pips Jallianwala Bagh in Tourist Footfall. Hindustan Times.
76.
SharmaN (2020) Dark tourism and moral disengagement in liminal spaces. Tourism Geographies22(2): 273–297.
77.
SpadoniEPorroSBordegoniMArosioIBarbaliniLCarulliM (2022) Augmented reality to engage visitors of science museums through interactive experiences. Heritage5(3): 1370–1394.
SthapitECoudounarisDNBjörkP (2019) Extending the memorable tourism experience construct: an investigation of memories of local food experiences. Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism19(4–5): 333–353.
80.
StylidisDWoosnamKMKimSS (2022) Perceptions of attractions, residents as “more knowledgeable others” and destination image: evidence from two destinations. International Journal of Tourism Research24(3): 472–486.
81.
TerasakiSHaraTIkegamiJ (2023) Mediating role of the country image in enhancing memorable experiences and revisits: an Analysis of U.S. tourists in Japan. Tourism Recreation Research49: 1–13.
82.
The Economic Times (2019) “Virasat-e-Khalsa”, Museum with Highest Footfall in India. The Economic Times.
83.
TsaiS (2020) Augmented reality enhancing place satisfaction for heritage tourism marketing. Current Issues in Tourism23(9): 1078–1083.
84.
TungVWSRitchieJRB (2011) Exploring the essence of memorable tourism experiences. Annals of Tourism Research38(4): 1367–1386.
85.
WeiJZhouLLiL (2024) A study on the impact of tourism destination image and local attachment on the revisit intention: the moderating effect of perceived risk. PLoS One19(1): e0296524.
86.
WhiteJTHickieJOrrAJacksonCRichardsonR (2023) The experience economy in UK city centres: a multidimensional and interconnected response to the ‘death of the high street’. Urban Studies60(10): 1833–1852.
87.
WuXZhaoY (2023) An integrated model of five sense perceptions and memorable tourism experiences: mediating effects of positive emotion. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research28(8): 860–876.
88.
WuH-CLiM-YLiT (2018) A study of experiential quality, experiential value, experiential satisfaction, theme park image, and revisit intention. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research42(1): 26–73.
89.
XuNLiYWeiXXieLYuLLiangH-N (2024a) CubeMuseum AR: a tangible augmented reality interface for cultural heritage learning and museum gifting. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction40(6): 1409–1437.
90.
XuSKhanKIShahzadMF (2024b) Examining the influence of technological self-efficacy, perceived trust, security, and electronic word of mouth on ICT usage in the education sector. Scientific Reports14(1): 16196.
91.
XuYXieMXiongS (2024c) Application of virtual reality technology in historical and cultural landscape reproduction. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences9(1): 20241583.
92.
YamagishiKde OcampoMOcampoL (2023) Revisit intention of tourists in farm tourism sites. Current Issues in Tourism27: 1–28.
93.
ZhangHYangYZhengCZhangJ (2016) Too dark to revisit? The role of past experiences and intrapersonal constraints. Tourism Management54: 452–464.
94.
ZhaoZShiDHuangZLiuX (2023) How does tourism memory affect revisit decisions? The mediating role of episodic future thinking. Tourism Management Perspectives49: 101199.
95.
ZhouXNgSIDengW (2024) Why I revisit a historic town in Chengdu? Roles of cognitive image, affective image and memorable tourism experiences. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics36(11): 2869–2888.
96.
ZhuCFongLHNGanM (2023a) Rethinking the consequences of postmodern authenticity: the case of a World Cultural Heritage in Augmented Reality. Current Issues in Tourism26(4): 617–631.
97.
ZhuCHallCMFongLHNLiuCYNNaderi KoupaeiS (2023b) Does a good story prompt visit intention? Evidence from the augmented reality experience at a heritage site in China. Journal of Heritage Tourism18(4): 427–444.
98.
ZhuCIoM-UNganHFBPeraltaRL (2023c) Understanding augmented reality marketing in world cultural heritage site, the lens of authenticity perspective. Journal of Vacation Marketing29(2): 242–255.
99.
ZhuCIoMHallCMNganHFBPeraltaRL (2024a) How to use augmented reality to promote a destination? The mediating role of augmented reality attachment. International Journal of Tourism Research26(1): e2603.
100.
ZhuCIoM-UNganHFBPeraltaRL (2024b) Interpreting the impact of augmented reality on heritage tourism: two empirical studies from World Heritage sites. Current Issues in Tourism: 1–15.
