This study provides a comprehensive examination of the potential impacts of Hyperloop technology on the tourism and hospitality sectors, offering strategic insights for stakeholders to address upcoming challenges and opportunities. Through an extensive literature review, we identify several ways in which Hyperloop travel could transform these sectors. Potential benefits include enabling seamless multi-destination day trips, promoting culinary tourism, enhancing the Meetings, Incentives, Conferences, and Exhibitions (MICE) sector, and generating employment around Hyperloop hubs. However, Hyperloop may also reduce bookings in traditional accommodations, decrease interest in conventional air and rail travel, limit tourist exploration to destinations within the Hyperloop network, and decline in travel expenditure in a specific location. These findings have significant practical implications, providing valuable guidance to tourism and hospitality businesses and policymakers as they prepare for the commercialization of Hyperloop technology.
Boto-GarcíaDBaños PinoJF (2023) Preference shifts during health shocks: foreign tourists’ expenditure–price elasticity throughout the pandemic. Journal of Travel Research63: 642–658.
5.
BradleyR (2016) The unbelievable reality of the impossible Hyperloop. Technology Review119: 38–47.
CrainicTGRicciardiNStorchiG (2004) Advanced freight transportation systems for congested urban areas. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies12(2): 119–137.
GomezeljDO (2016) A systematic review of research on innovation in hospitality and tourism. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management28(3): 516–558.
11.
GuerrieriM (2022) Hyperloop, HeliRail, Transrapid and high-speed rail systems: technical characteristics and cost-benefit analyses. Research in Transportation Business & Management43: 100824–100918.
12.
GurkinaA (2013) Travel Experience in Hotels for the MICE Industry. Finland: Bachelor’s thesis. Haaga-Helia University.
13.
HansenIA (2020) Hyperloop transport technology assessment and system analysis. Transportation Planning and Technology43(8): 803–820.
14.
HaqueMMChinHCDebnathAK (2013) Sustainable, safe, smart—three key elements of Singapore’s evolving transport policies. Transport Policy27: 20–31.
15.
HollebeekLRatherRA (2019) Service innovativeness and tourism customer outcomes. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management31(11): 4227–4246.
16.
KangSE (2022) Travelers’ pro‐environmental behaviors in the Hyperloop context: integrating norm activation and AIDA models. International Journal of Tourism Research24(6): 813–826.
17.
KangSEKimT (2023) The influence of YouTube content on travelers’ intentions to use Hyperloop trains: using trust transfer theory. Travel Behaviour and Society30: 281–290.
18.
KangSEChungNLeeK, et al. (2024) Residents’ support for Hyperloop development and their travel intention: a case study of Gyeongnam Province, South Korea. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research29(6): 663–680.
19.
KhanMKhanMA (2009) How technological innovations extend services outreach to customers: the changing shape of hospitality services taxonomy. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management21(5): 509–522.
20.
KimT (2023) Over the rainbow: how to fly over with ChatGPT in tourism. Journal of Smart Tourism3(1): 41–47. DOI: 10.52255/smarttourism.2023.3.1.5.
21.
KimMJMichael HallC (2022) Does active transport create a win-win situation for environmental and human health? The moderating effect of leisure and tourism activity. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management52: 487–498.
22.
KimMJHallCMKwonO (2023a) Space tourism: do age and gender make a difference in risk perception?Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management57: 13–17.
23.
KimMJHallCMChungN, et al. (2023b) What makes tourists use public transport? Value-belief-norm theory, environmental, social, and governance factors, and the sustainable development goals. Journal of Travel Research: 00472875231191708.
24.
KimMJHallCMChungN, et al. (2023c) Why do tourists use public transport in Korea? The roles of artificial intelligence knowledge, environmental, social, and governance, and sustainability. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research28(5): 467–484.
25.
KimJLeeSHongDG, et al. (2024) The influence of AI and smart apps on tourist public transport use: applying mixed methods. NeuroMolecular Medicine26(1): 1–24.
26.
KooCParkJHunterWC (2023) Smart tourism design: a semiotic affordances approach. Journal of Smart Tourism3(2): 15–21.
27.
KuoCMChenLCTsengCY (2017) Investigating an innovative service with hospitality robots. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management29(5): 1305–1321.
28.
LafozMNavarroGTorresJ, et al. (2020) Power supply solution for ultra-high-speed Hyperloop trains. Smart Cities3(3): 642–656.
MarascoADe MartinoMMagnottiF, et al. (2018) Collaborative innovation in tourism and hospitality: a systematic review of the literature. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management30(6): 2364–2395.
31.
MateuJMFernándezPMFrancoRI (2021) Setting safety foundations in the Hyperloop: a first approach to preliminary hazard analysis and safety assurance system. Safety Science142: 1–15.
32.
MitropoulosLKortsariAKoliatosA, et al. (2021) The Hyperloop system and stakeholders: a review and future directions. Sustainability13(15): 8430–8515.
NikitasAKougiasIAlyavinaE, et al. (2017) How can autonomous and connected vehicles, electromobility, BRT, hyperloop, shared use mobility and mobility-as-a-service shape transport futures for the context of smart cities?Urban Science1(4): 36.
36.
NølandJK (2021) Prospects and challenges of the Hyperloop transportation system: a systematic technology review. IEEE Access9: 28439–28458.
37.
OhJSKangTHamS, et al. (2019) Numerical analysis of aerodynamic characteristics of Hyperloop system. Energies12(3): 1–17.
38.
OpgenoordMMCaplanPC (2018) Aerodynamic design of the Hyperloop concept. AIAA Journal56(11): 4261–4270.
39.
OttenbacherMCHarringtonRJ (2013) A case study of a culinary tourism campaign in Germany: implications for strategy making and successful implementation. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research37(1): 3–28.
40.
PremsagarSKenworthyJ (2022) A critical review of Hyperloop (ultra-high-speed rail) technology: urban and transport planning, technical, environmental, economic, and human considerations. Frontiers in Sustainable Cities4: 1–14.
41.
PrideauxB (2000) The role of the transport system in destination development. Tourism Management21(1): 53–63.
42.
RajendranSSinhaAA (2023) Can Hyperloops substitute high-speed rails in the future?International Journal of Systems Science: Operations & Logistics10(1): 2070295.
SuiYNiuJYuQ, et al. (2021) Numerical analysis of the aerothermodynamic behavior of a Hyperloop in choked flow. Energy237: 121427–121514.
47.
van GoeverdenKMilakisDJanicM, et al. (2018) Analysis and modeling of performances of the HL (Hyperloop) transport system. European Transport Research Review10(2): 1–17.
48.
Voltes-DortaABeckerE (2018) The potential short-term impact of a Hyperloop service between San Francisco and Los Angeles on airport competition in California. Transport Policy71: 45–56.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
