This paper considers many of the aspects of work-related stress, including problems of definition, the legal duties and responsibilities of employers towards their employees concerning stress. It includes an outline of some of the possible financial consequences (and legal penalties) if employers do not, so far as is reasonably practicable, take appropriate action to remove, reduce or alleviate work-related stressors affecting their employees' health. The paper concludes with a summary of a range of coping strategies which will assist employers to comply with legislative requirements and duties.
Davis L E and Taylor J C (eds) (1972). Design ofJobs. Harmondsworth: PenguinGrasha A.F. (1995). Practical Applications of Psychology. 4th Revised Edition. USA: HarperCollins College
4.
Grayham D.A. and Del Rosario V.O. (1997). The Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1992. J Roy Soc Health;117,47-51
5.
HEALTH AND SAFETY (DISPLAY SCREEN EQUIPMENT) REGULATIONS (1992 ). London: HMSO
6.
HEALTH AND SAFETY AT WORK ETC ACT (1974). London: HMSOManagement Of Health And Safety At Work Regulations 1992 (1992). London: HMSO
7.
Manual Handling Operations Regulations (1992 ). London: HMSORosenman R.H., Friedman M. and Strauss R. (1966). Coronary Heart Disease in the Western Collaborative Group Study. JAMA; 195, 86-93
8.
Sheridan C.L. and Radmacher S.A. (1992). Health Psychology: Challenging the Biomedical Model. p 148Chichester: Wiley THOMPSON GRAY AND NICHOLSON v SMITHS SHIPREPAIRERS (NORTH SHIELDS) LTD (1984). IRLR 93
9.
WALKER v NORTHUMBERLAND COUNTY COUNCIL (1995). IRLR 35
10.
Warr (1987). Psychology at Work . p 250. Harmondsworth: Penguin
11.
WEST BROMWICH BUILDING SOCIETY v TOWNSEND (1983). ICR 257
