Debate regarding how to conduct digital anthropology is currently contested, with two primary methodologies emerging: researchers who conduct projects wholly in cyberspace, and those who look at the use of digital technologies by their informants, contextualised in the offline world. This paper suggests a third way, arguing that immersive cohabitation is possible where online and offline fieldsites are viewed as part of a larger blended field. This paper builds on two years’ ethnographic fieldwork with Instagram to call for immersive cohabitation as a new method to be considered by digital anthropologists and ethnographers. Further to this blended approach, this paper argues for a move beyond participant observation to working as observing participants in the virtual. This dual approach restructures current anthropological methods for digital working to enhance the quality and depth of data collection whilst ensuring the continued currency of the anthropologist in a rapidly modernising and increasingly digitised world.
BakerS (2013)
Conceptualising the use of Facebook in ethnographic research: As tool, as data and as context.Ethnography & Education8(2): 131–245.
2.
BoellstorffT (2012) Rethinking digital anthropology. In: HorstHAMillerD (eds) Digital Anthropology.
London:
Bloomsbury, pp.39–60.
3.
BoellstorffT (2015) Coming of Age in Second Life: An Anthropologist Explores the Virtually Human.
Princeton, NJ:
Princeton University Press.
4.
BoissevainJ (1978 [1974]) Friends of Friends: Networks, Manipulations and Coalitions.
Oxford:
Blackwell.
5.
BordieuP (1996 [1984]) Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste.
Cambridge, MA:
Harvard University Press.
6.
BurrellJ (2009)
The field site as a network: A strategy for locating ethnographic research.Field Methods21(2): 181–199.
7.
CoffeyA (1993) Double entry: The profession and organizational socialization of graduate accountants. PhD Thesis, University of Wales, UK.
8.
CoffeyA (1999) The Ethnographic Self: Fieldwork and the Representation of Identity.
London:
Sage.
9.
CostaE (2016) Social Media in Southeast Turkey: Love, Kinship and Politics.
London:
UCL Press.
10.
GarstenCWulffH (2003) New Technologies at Work: People, Screens and Social Virtuality.
Oxford:
Berg.
11.
GeertzC (1974) Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity.
New York:
J Aronson.
12.
GoffmanE (1971) Relations in Public.
London:
Penguin.
13.
GoffmanE (1980 [1956]) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life.
London:
Pelican.
14.
HaynesN (2016) Social Media in Northern Chile: Posting the Extraordinarily Ordinary.
London:
UCL Press.
15.
HineC (2015) Ethnography for the Internet: Embedded, Embodies and Everyday.
London:
Bloomsbury.
16.
HolyL (1988) Theory, methodology and the research process. In: EllenRF (ed) Ethnographic Research: A Guide to General Conduct. ASA Research Methods in Social Anthropology.
London:
Academic Press Limited, pp.13–34.
17.
HorstHA (2009) Aesthetics of the self: Digital mediations. In: MillerD (ed) Anthropology and the Individual: A Material Culture Perspective.
Oxford:
Berg, pp.99–113.
18.
HorstHAMillerD (2006) The Cell Phone: An Anthropology of Communication.
Oxford:
Berg.
19.
HorstHAMillerD (2012) Digital Anthropology.
London:
Bloomsbury.
20.
HumphreysL (1970) Tearoom Trade: A Study of Homosexual Encounters in Public Places.
Chicago, IL:
Aldine.
21.
KapfererB (1969) Norms and the manipulation of relationships in a work context. In: MitchellJC (ed) Social Networks in Urban Situations: Analyses of Personal Relationships in Central African Town.
Manchester:
Manchester University Press, pp.181–224.
22.
KondoDK (2009) Crafting Selves: Power, Gender, and Discourses of Identity in a Japanese Workplace.
Chicago, IL:
University of Chicago Press.
23.
LatourB (2005) Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory.
Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
24.
LawJ (2009) Actor network theory and material semiotics. In: TurnerBS (ed) The New Blackwell Companion to Social Theory.
Chichester:
Wiley-Blackwell, pp.141–158.
25.
LuvaasB (2016) Street Style: An Ethnography of Fashion Blogging.
London:
Bloomsbury Academic.
26.
McDonaldT (2016) Social Media in Rural China: Social Networks and Moral Frameworks.
London:
UCL Press.
27.
MackeeF (2016)
Social media in gay London: Tinder as an alternative to hook-up apps.Social Media + Society. July–September, 1–10.
28.
MadianouMMillerD (2012a) New Media and Migration.
London:
Routledge.
29.
MadianouMMillerD (2012b)
Polymedia: Towards a new theory of digital media and interpersonal communication. International Journal of Cultural Studies16(2): 169–187.
30.
MillerD (2004) The little black dress is the solution. But what’s the problem? In: EkstromKBrembeckH (eds) Elusive Consumption.
Oxford:
Berg, pp.113–127.
31.
MillerD (2011) Tales from Facebook.
Cambridge:
Polity.
32.
MillerD (2016) Social Media in an English Village: Or How to Keep People at Just the Right Distance.
London:
UCL Press.
33.
MillerDSinananJ (2014) Webcam.
Cambridge:
Polity.
34.
NardiBA (2010) My Life as a Night Elf Priest: An Anthropological Account of World of Warcraft.
Ann Arbor:
University of Michigan Press.
35.
NisbettN (2006) The internet, cybercafés and the new social spaces of Bangalorean youth. In: ColemanSCollinsP (eds) Locating the Field: Space, Place and Context in Anthropology.
Oxford:
Berg, pp.129–147.
36.
PinkSHorstHPostillJ, et al. (2016) Digital Ethnography: Principles and Practice.
London:
Sage.
37.
RapportN (2003) The computer as a focus of inattention: Five scenarios concerning hospital porters. In: GarstenCWulffH (eds) New Technologies at Work: People, Screens and Social Virtuality.
Oxford:
Berg, pp.25–44.
38.
ReedA (2005)
‘My blog is me’: Texts and persons in UK online journal culture (and anthropology).Ethnos: Journal of Anthropology70(2): 220–242.
39.
ReedA (2008)
‘Blog this’: Surfing the metropolis and the method of London.Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute14: 391–406.
40.
SchiffauerL (2013)
The mobile phone in Siberia: The impact of a new communication technology on the everyday culture of a postsocialist society. Zeitschrift für Ethnologie138(1): 23–35.
41.
SchneidermannN (2014)
‘Mic power’: ‘Public’ connections through hip hop nation in Kampala.Ethnography15(1): 88–105.
42.
SlaterD (2000) Consumption without scarcity: Exchange and normativity in an internet setting. In: JacksonPLoweMMillerD, et al. (eds) Commercial Cultures: Economies, Practices, Spaces.
Oxford:
Berg, pp.123–142.
43.
StempfhuberMLieglM (2012) Grindr: Empirical observations on some contemporary mediations of the pick-up-line. In: Society for Social Studies of Science Annual Conference. Frederiksberg: Copenhagen Business School.
44.
StempfhuberMLieglM (2016)
Intimacy mobilized: Hook-up practices in the location-based social network Grindr.Österreichische Zeitschrift für Soziologie41(1): 51–70.
45.
WacquantL (2004) Body & Soul: Notebooks of an Apprentice Boxer.
Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
46.
WangX (2016) Social Media in Industrial China.
London:
UCL Press.
47.
WulffH (2015)
In favour of flexible forms: Multi-sited fieldwork. In forum: Rethinking euro-anthropology. Forum: Rethinking Euro-Anthropology, In favour of flexible forms: multi-sited fieldwork.Social Anthropology23(3): 355–357.
