Establishing trust and obtaining informed consent with participants is reliant upon on a process whereby unequally positioned agents constantly re-negotiate (mis)trust and consent during ethnographic encounters. All research has been increasingly subject to an intensification in ethical regulation, within a context whereby Eurocentric norms and ethical guidelines arguably diminish individual accountability under the guise of quasi-contractual relationships. This phenomenon has particular implications for ethnography and its management of ethics, given its intimate, longitudinal and receptive nature. Two expert ethnographers working with children and young people draw upon their work to reveal how issues of informed consent and data ownership can shift and be a source of tension and unequal power dynamics. The ethnographer requires autonomy while managing ethics soundly in situ to work within the messiness and unpredictability of participants’ everyday lives.
AnnasG (2006)
Anthropology, IRBs, and human rights.American Ethnologist33(4): 541–544.
2.
Association of Social Anthropologists of the UK and the Commonwealth (ASA) (2011) Ethical Guidelines for Good Research Practice. Available at: https://www.theasa.org/ethics/guidelines.shtml (accessed 23 February 2018).
3.
Barley (2014) Identity and Social Interaction in a multi-ethnic classroom. E&E Publishing.
4.
Barley (2016) Supporting young children in multi-lingual settings. Early Years Education 18(6): 36--38.
5.
Barley R and Russell L (2019) Participatory visual methods: exploring young people's identities, hopes and feelings. Ethnography and Education 14(2): 223--241.
BellK (2014)
Resisting commensurability: Against informed consent as an anthropological virtue. American Anthropologist116(3): 511–522.
8.
BloomLRSawinP (2009)
Ethical responsibilities in feminist research: Challenging ourselves to do activist research with women in poverty. International Studies of Qualitative Studies in Education22: 340–342.
9.
BoskC (2009)
The new bureaucracies of virtue or when form fails to follow function.PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review30(2): 192–209.
10.
Cheney KE (2011) Children as ethnographers: Reflections on the importance of participatory research in assessing orphans needs. Childhood 18(2): 166--179.
11.
DingwellR (2012) How did we ever get into this mess? The rise of ethical regulation in the social sciences. In: LoveK (ed.) Ethics in Social Research.
Bingley:
Emerald Press.
GRC (2013) Community Views on the Government’s Prevent Strategy within Hackney.
London:
Griffin Research and Consultancy Ltd.
16.
HammersleyM (2009)
Against the ethicists: On the evils of ethical regulation. International Journal of Social Research Methodology12(
3).
17.
HollandP (2003) We Don’t Play with Guns Here.
New York:
McGraw-Hill Education.
18.
HoeyerKHogleLF (2014)
Informed consent: The politics of intent and practice in medical research ethics.Annual Review of Anthropology43: 347–362.
19.
KatzJ (2006)
Ethical escape routes for undergraduate ethnographers. American Ethnologist33(4): 235–247.
20.
KamuyaDMTheobaldSJMarshVParkerMGeisserWPMolyneuxSC (2015)
‘The one who chases you away does not tell you to go’: Silent refusals and complex power relations in research consent processes in Costal Kenya. PloS ONE10(5).
21.
Karniele-MillerOStrierRPessachL (2009)
Power relations in qualitative research.Qualitative Health Research19(2): 279–289.
22.
LedermanR (2006)
Introduction: Anxious borders between work and life in a time of bureaucratic ethics regulation.American Ethnologist33(4): 477–481.
23.
LedermanR (2007)
Comparative research: A modest proposal concerning the object of ethics regulation.PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review30(2): 305–327.
24.
MarranciG (2008) The Anthropology of Islam.
Oxford:
Berg.
25.
MetroR (2014)
From the form to face to face: IRBs, ethnographic researchers, and human subjects translate consent. Anthropology andEducation Quarterly45(2): 167–184.
26.
MoodieS (2010)
Power, rights, respect and data ownership in academic research with indigenous peoples.Environmental Research110: 818–820.
27.
MurtujaNTufailW (2017) Rethinking Prevent: A Case for an Alternative Approach.
Rotherham:
Just Yorkshire.
28.
NaderL (1971) Up the anthropologist – perspectives gained from studying up. In: HymesDH (ed.) Reinventing Anthropology.
New York:
Pantheon, 284–311.
29.
NicholsNGriffithAand McLarnonM (2017) Community-based and Participatory Approaches in Institutional Ethnography in Perspectives on and from Institutional Ethnography.
Bingley:
Emerald Books.
30.
O’DonnellA (2016)
Securitisation, counterterrorism and the silencing of dissent: The educational implications of Prevent.British Journal of Educational Studies64(1): 53–76.
31.
PaleyVG (2014) Boys and Girls: Superheroes in the Doll Corner.
Chicago:
University of Chicago Press.
32.
PelsP (2014)
After objectivity: An historical approach to the intersubjectivity in ethnography. Journal of Ethnographic Theory4(1): 211–236.
33.
PelsPBoogIFlorusboshJHKripeZMinterT, et al. (2018)
Data management in anthropology: The next phase in ethics governance?Social Anthropology26(3): 391–413.
34.
RaghavanA (2017) Towards Corporal Cosmopolitanism: Performing Decolonial Solidarities.
London:
Rowman and Littlefield.
35.
Russell (2005) It's a question of trust: Balancing the relationship between students and teachers in ethnographic fieldwork. Qualitative Research 5(2): 181--199.
36.
RuthD (2015)
With the eyes of others: An ethnography of an academic office.Ethnography and Education11(3): 359–370.
37.
SalwayS, Barley, AllmarkPGerrishKHigginbottomGEllisonGTH (2012)
Can the quality of social research on ethnicity be improved through the introduction of guidance? Findings from a commissioning pilot exercise.International Journal of Social Research Methodology15(5): 385–401.
38.
ShannonJ (2007)
Informed consent: Documenting the intersection of bureaucratic regulation and ethnographic practice. PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review30(2): 229–248.
39.
Siraj-Blatchford I and Sylvia K (2004) Researching pedagogy in English pre-schools. British Educational Research Journal 30(5): 713--730.
40.
StanfordBAhmedY (2016)
The Prevent Strategy: The human rights implications of the United Kingdom’s counter-radicalisation policy. Questions of International Law24: 35–58.
41.
Teaching Times (2016) The Prevent Strategy.
Birmingham:
Teaching Times.
42.
UCU (2015) The Prevent Duty: A Guide for Branches and Members.
London:
UCU.
43.
VoloshinovV (1986) Marxism and the Philosophy of Language.
Cambridge,
MA: Harvard University Press.
44.
WilsonAHodgsonP (2012) Trust, coercion and care: Researching marginalised groups. In: LoveK (ed.) Ethics in Social Research.
Bingley:
Emerald Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
