Ethnography has compelled sociology to recognize and articulate the implications of the fact that it is a human science. This response to readers of Interpretation and Social Knowledge is presented as an exercise in ‘working epistemics’: a reflection on knowledge production that connects the philosophy of social science to extant problems in specific subfields and methodological approaches in sociology, themselves connected to the work of making empirically driven truth claims in sociology. In so doing, it addresses the investigator’s reflexivity about his or her knowledge production, causality and contrastive explanation, social power and the theory of fields, and finally the relationship between hermeneutic sociology and the sociological lexicon bequeathed by a ‘theory of action’.
AbbottA (2001) Time Matters: On Theory and Method, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
2.
BiernackiR (2012) Reinventing Evidence in Social Inquiry: Decoding Facts and Variables, London: Palgrave Macmillan.
3.
Biernacki R (2013) Reading scholarship with Reed. Trajectories: Newsletter of the ASA Comparative and Historical Sociology Section 24(2).
4.
Bourdieu P, Chamboredon J-C and Passeron J-C (1991) The Craft of Sociology: Epistemological Preliminaries, trans. Nice R. New York: Walter de Gruyter.
5.
BourdieuP (1980) The Logic of Practice, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
6.
Decoteau C (2013) Agency. Paper presented at ‘Critical Realism: Problems and Prospects’, New York City, 14–15 August.
7.
EyalG (2013) Spaces between fields. In: GorskiP (ed.) Bourdieu and Historical Analysis, Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 158–182.
8.
GadamerH-G (1989) Truth and Method, 2nd rev. edn, New York: Continuum.
9.
Garfinkel A (1981) Forms of Explanation: Rethinking the Questions in Social Theory. New Haven: Yale University Press.
10.
GoertzGMahoneyJ (2012) A Tale of Two Cultures: Contrasting Qualitative and Quantitative Paradigms, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
11.
GoldthorpeJH (2001) Causation, statistics, and sociology. European Sociological Review17(1): 1–20.
12.
HawthornG (1991) Plausible Worlds: Possibility and Understanding in History and the Social Sciences, New York: Cambridge University Press.
13.
JerolmackCKhanS (2014) Talk is cheap: Ethnography and the attitudinal fallacy. Sociological Methods & Research43(2): 1–32.
14.
KatzJ (2002) From how to why: On luminous description and causal inference in ethnography (Part 2). Ethnography3(1): 63–90.
15.
KhalifaK (2004) Erotetic contextualism, data-generating procedures, and sociological explanations of social mobility. Philosophy of the Social Sciences34(1): 38–54.
16.
KhanSR (2011) Privilege: The Making of an Adolescent Elite at St. Paul’s School, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
17.
LareauA (2011) Unequal Childhoods: Class, Race, and Family Life, 2nd edn, Berkeley: University of California Press.
18.
LucasSR (2014) Beyond the existence proof: Ontological conditions, epistemological implications, and in-depth interview research. Quality & Quantity48(1): 387–408.
19.
LukerK (2008) Salsa Dancing into the Social Sciences: Research in an Age of Info-glut, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
20.
MartinJL (2003) What is field theory?American Journal of Sociology109(1): 1–49.
21.
MedvetzT (2012) Think Tanks in America, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
22.
MorganSLWinshipC (2007) Counterfactuals and Causal Inference: Methods and Principles for Social Research, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23.
PughAJ (2013) What good are interviews for thinking about culture? Demystifying interpretive analysis. American Journal of Cultural Sociology1(1): 42–68.
24.
Reed IA (2008) Language as a metaphor for culture and the uses of theory in cultural sociology. Perspectives June: 5–7.
25.
ReedIA (2011) Interpretation and Social Knowledge: On the Use of Theory in the Human Sciences, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
26.
RicoeurP (1981) Hermeneutics and the Human Sciences, New York: Cambridge University Press.
27.
RisjordMW (2000) Woodcutters and Witchcraft: Rationality and Interpretive Change in the Social Sciences, New York: SUNY Press.
28.
SewellWHJr (2005) Logics of History: Social Theory and Social Transformation, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
29.
Simmel G (1950) The Sociology of Georg Simmel, trans. and ed. Wolff K. New York: The Free Press.
30.
SmallML (2009) How many cases do I need? On science and the logic of case selection in field-based research. Ethnography10(1): 5–38.
31.
SteinmetzG (2005) The Politics of Method in the Human Sciences: Positivism and Its Epistemological Others, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
32.
SteinmetzG (2008) The colonial state as a social field: Ethnographic capital and native policy in the German overseas empire before 1914. American Sociological Review73(4): 589–612.
33.
VoyerAM (2013) Strangers and Neighbors: Multiculturalism, Conflict, and Community in America, New York: Cambridge University Press.
34.
WalzerM (1987) Interpretation and Social Criticism, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
35.
WylieA (2002) Thinking from Things: Essays in the Philosophy of Archaeology, Berkeley: University of California Press.
