For many, reflexivity is a core tenet in qualitative research. Often, scholars focus on how one or two of their socio-demographic traits compare to their participants and how it may influence field dynamics. Research that incorporates an intersectionality perspective, which brings attention to how people’s multiple identities are entwined, also has a long history. Yet, researchers tend to pay less attention to how we strategically draw on our multiple social positions in the course of field work. Drawing on data I have collected over the past several years and extending recent sociological work that goes beyond a reflexive accounting of one or two of researchers’ demographic characteristics, I argue that each researcher has their own ethnographic toolkit from which they strategically draw. It consists of researchers’ visible (e.g. race/ethnicity) and invisible tools (e.g. social capital) and ties qualitative methodologies to research on how culture is strategically and inconsistently used.
AguilarJL (1981) Insider research: An ethnography of a debate. In: MesserschmidtD (ed.) Anthropologists at Home in North America: Methods and Issues in the Study of One’s Own Society.
Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press, pp. 15–26.
2.
AndersonE (1990) Streetwise: Race, Class and Change in an Urban Community.
Chicago, IL:
University of Chicago Press.
3.
BolakHC (1996)
Studying one’s own in the Middle East: Negotiating gender and self-other dynamics in the field.Qualitative Sociology19(1): 107–130.
4.
BrewerJ (2000) Ethnography.
Buckingham:
Open University Press.
5.
Brown-SaracinoJ (2014)
From methodological stumbles to substantive insights: Gaining ethnographic access in queer communities.Qualitative Sociology37(1): 43–68.
6.
BurawoyM (1998)
The extended case method.Sociological Theory16(1): 4–33.
7.
BurawoyM (2003)
Revisits: An outline of a theory of reflexive ethnography.American Sociological Review68: 645–679.
8.
ChegeN (2015)
‘What’s in it for me?’: Negotiations of asymmetries, concerns, and interests between the researcher and research subjects.Ethnography16(4): 463–481.
9.
CollinsPH (1986)
Learning from the outsider within: The sociological significance of black feminist thought.Social Problems33(6): S14–S32.
10.
CollinsPH (2015)
Intersectionality’s definitional dilemmas.Annual Review of Sociology41: 1–20.
11.
ContrerasR (2013) The Stickup Kids: Race, Drugs, Violence, and the American Dream.
Berkeley, CA:
University of California Press.
DavisD (1997)
The direction of race of interviewer effects among African-Americans: Donning the black mask.American Journal of Political Science41(1): 309–322.
14.
DeeganMJ (2001) The Chicago School of Ethnography. In: AtkinsonPCoffeyADelamontSLoflandJLoflandL (eds) Handbook of Ethnography.
Los Angeles:
SAGE, pp. 11–25.
15.
DesmondM (2016) Evicted: Poverty and Profit in the American City.
New York:
Crown.
16.
DiMaggioP (1997)
Culture and cognition.Annual Review of Sociology23: 263–287.
17.
DoucetA (2008) ‘
From her side of the gossamer wall(s)’: Reflexivity and relational knowing.Qualitative Sociology31: 73–87.
18.
DuckW (2015) No Way Out: Precarious Living in the Shadow of Poverty and Drug Dealing.
Chicago, IL:
University of Chicago Press.
19.
DuneierM (1999) Sidewalk.
New York:
Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.
20.
DuneierM (2011)
How not to lie with ethnography.Sociological Methodology41: 1–11.
21.
EnloeC (2000 [1989]) Bananas, Beaches, and Bases: Making Feminist Sense of International Politics.
Berkeley, CA:
University of California Press.
22.
FloresGM (2016)
Discovering a hidden privilege: Ethnography in multiracial organizations as an outsider within. Ethnography17(2): 190–212.
23.
GoffmanA (2014) On the Run: Fugitive Life in an American City.
Chicago, IL:
Chicago University Press.
24.
HoangKK (2015) Dealing in Desire: Asian Ascendancy, Western Decline, and the Hidden Currencies of Global Sex Work.
Berkeley, CA:
University of California Press.
25.
InnesRA (2009)
‘Who are you anyways?’ The insider/outsider debate and American Indian studies.American Indian Quarterly33(4): 440–461.
26.
JacobsJ (1992) The Death and Life of Great American Cities.
New York:
Vintage Books.
27.
LacyK (2007) Blue-Chip Black: Race, Class, and Status in the New Black Middle Class.
Berkeley, CA:
University of California Press.
28.
LamontMMolnárV (2002)
The study of boundaries in the social sciences.Annual Review of Sociology28: 167–195.
29.
LichtermanP (2017)
Interpretive reflexivity in ethnography.Ethnography18(1): 35–45.
30.
LiebowE (2003 [1967]) Tally’s Corner: A Study of Negro Streetcorner Men.
Lanham, MD:
Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
31.
MayRAB (2014)
When the methodological shoe is on the other foot: African American interviewer and white interviewees.Qualitative Sociology37: 117–136.
32.
MearsA (2015)
Working for free in the VIP: Relational work and the production of consent.American Sociological Review80(6): 1099–1122.
33.
MertonRK (1972)
Insiders and outsiders: A chapter in the sociology of knowledge.American Journal of Sociology78(1): 9–47.
34.
MeyerhoffB (1980) Number Our Days: A Triumph of Community and Culture Among Jewish Old People in an Urban Ghetto.
New York:
Simon & Schuster.
35.
MillsCW (2000 [1959]) The Power Elite.
Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
36.
MiralaoVACarlosCOFulleros SantosA (1990) Women Entertainers in Angeles and Olongapo: A Survey Report.
Manila, Philippines:
Women’s Education, Development, Productivity and Research Organization (WEDPRO).
37.
Pattillo-McCoyM (1999) Black Picket Fences: Privilege and Peril among the Black Middle Class.
Chicago, IL:
Chicago University Press.
38.
PortesA (2010) Economic Sociology: A Systematic Inquiry.
Princeton, NJ:
Princeton University Press.
39.
Reyes V (2015) Global borderlands: a case study of subic bay freeport zone. Theory and Society 44(4): 355–384.
40.
Reyes V (2017) Stigmatized Love, Boundary-Making, and the Heroic Love Myth: Filipina Women Constructing their Relationships with U.S. Military Men Within and Beyond the Legal Framework. In Fresnoza-Flot A and Ricordeau G (eds) International Marriages and Marital Citizenship: Southeast Asian Women on the Move. Abingdon, UK: Routledge, pp. 140–157.
41.
Reyes V (2018) Three models of transparency in ethnographic research: naming places, naming people, and sharing data. Ethnography 19(2): 204–226.
42.
Reyes V (forthcoming) Global Borderlands: Fantasy, Violence, and Empire in Subic Bay, Philippines. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
43.
RiosVM (2011) Punished: Policing the Lives of Black and Latino Boys.
New York:
New York University Press.
44.
RiosVM (2015)
Book Review On the Run: Fugitive Life in an American City by Alice Goffman.American Journal of Sociology121(1): 306–308.
45.
RiosVMCarneyNKelekayJ (2017)
Ethnographies of race, crime, and justice: Toward a sociological double-consciousness.Annual Review of Sociology43: 493–513.
46.
RiveraL (2015) Pedigree: How Elite Students Get Elite Jobs.
Princeton, NJ:
Princeton University Press.
47.
RobertsonJ (2002)
Reflexivity redux: A pithy polemic on ‘positionality’.Anthropological Quarterly75(4): 785–792.
48.
Sánchez-JankowskiM (2002) Representation, responsibility and reliability in participant-observation. In: MayT (ed.) Qualitative Research in Action.
London:
SAGE, pp. 144–160.
49.
SmallM (2015)
De-exoticizing ghetto poverty: On the ethics of representation in urban ethnography.City & Community14(4): 352–358.
50.
Steinmetz G (2008) The colonial state as a social field: ethnographic capital and native policy in the german overseas empire before 1914. American Sociological Review 73: 589–612.
51.
SwidlerA (1986)
Culture in action: Symbols and strategies.American Sociological Review51(2): 273–286.
52.
SwidlerA (2001) Talk of Love: How Culture Matters.
Chicago, IL:
Chicago University Press.
53.
TimmermansSTavoryI (2012)
Theory construction in qualitative research: From grounded theory to abductive analysis.Sociological Theory30(3): 167–186.
54.
VenkateshS (2006) Off the Books: The Underground Economy of the Urban Poor.
Cambridge, MA:
Harvard University Press.
55.
Venkatesh S (2008) Gang Leader for a Day. London, UK: Penguin Books.
56.
WasserfallR (1993)
Reflexivity, feminism and difference.Qualitative Sociology16(1): 23–41.
57.
WherryFF (2011) The Philadelphia Barrio: The Arts, Branding, and Neighborhood Transformation.
Chicago, IL:
University of Chicago Press.
58.
WoodwardK (2008)
Hanging out and hanging about: Insider/outsider research in the sport of boxing.Ethnography9(4): 536–561.
59.
YoungAJr (2004) The Minds of Marginalized Black Men: Making Sense of Mobility, Opportunity, and Future Life Chances.
Princeton, NJ:
Princeton University Press.
60.
YoungAJr (2008) White ethnographers on the experiences of African American men: Then and now. In: ZuberiTBonilla-SilvaE (eds) White Logic, White Methods: Racism and Methodology.
Lanham, MD:
Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 179–200.
61.
ZelizerV (2005) The Purchase of Intimacy.
Princeton, NJ:
Princeton University Press.
