This article explores how online communications and social networking sites raise new ethical and methodological questions for qualitative researchers who design studies to be primarily ‘off-line’. The author explores how social media affect efforts to recruit participants, gain informed consent, collect data, leave the field, and disseminate results, particularly as participants have greater ability to respond to those findings. In examining the dilemmas ethnographers increasingly encounter, this article points to the shifts of power between participants and researchers and suggests that this might promise greater equity between participants and researchers, while also potentially introducing new pitfalls.
AbellJLockeACondorS (2006) Trying similarity, doing difference: The role of interviewer self-disclosure in interview talk with young people. Qualitative Research6: 221–244.
2.
AbrilPS (2007–8) (My)Space of one’s own: On privacy and online social networks. Northwestern Journal of Technology & Intellectual Property6: 73–88.
3.
AdlerPAdlerP (1987) Membership Roles in Field Research, Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
4.
AndersonE (2000) Code of the Street: Decency, Violence and the Moral Life of the Inner City, New York: W.W. Norton.
5.
ArendellT (1997) Reflections on the researcher-researched relationship: A woman interviewing men. Qualitative Sociology20: 341–368.
6.
ASA (American Sociological Association) (2008) Code of Ethics and Policies and Procedures of the ASA Committee on Professional Ethics. Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.
7.
BleeK (2003) Inside Organized Racism: Women in the Hate Movement, Berkeley: University of California Press.
8.
BobelC (2002) The Paradox of Natural Mothering, Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
9.
BourgoisP (1995) In Search of Respect: Selling Crack in El Barrio, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10.
BourgoisP (2000) Violating apartheid in the United States: On the streets and in academia. In: TwineFWWarrenJW (eds) Racing Research, Researching Race: Methodological Dilemmas in Critical Race Studies, New York: New York University Press, pp. 187–214.
11.
BriassoulisH (2010) Online petitions: New tools of secondary analysis?Qualitative Research, 10, 715–727.
12.
BynumSABrandtHMAnnangL (2012) Do health beliefs, health care system distrust, and racial pride influence HPV vaccine acceptability among African American college females?Journal of Health Psychology17: 217–226.
13.
DuneierM (2000a) Race and peeing on Sixth Avenue. In: TwineFWWarrenJ (eds) Racing Research, Researching Race: Methodological Dilemmas in Critical Race Studies, New York: NYU Press, pp. 215–226.
14.
DuneierM (2000b) Sidewalk, New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.
15.
FarrellDPetersenJC (2010) The growth of internet research methods and the reluctant sociologist. Sociological Inquiry80: 114–125.
16.
FineGA (1993) Ten lies of ethnography: Moral dilemmas of field research. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography22: 267–294.
17.
FoxNWardKO’RourkeA (2005) Pro-anorexia, weight-loss drugs and the internet: An ‘anti-recovery’ explanatory model of anorexia. Sociology of Health & Illness27: 944–971.
18.
GarciaACStandleeAIBechkoffJ (2009) Ethnographic approaches to the internet and computer-mediated communication. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography38: 52–84.
19.
GauchatG (2012) Politicization of science in the public sphere: A study of public trust in the United States, 1974 to 2010. American Sociological Review77: 167–187.
20.
GiordanoJO’ReillyMTaylorH (2007) Confidentiality and autonomy: The challenge(s) of offering research participants a choice of disclosing their identity. Qualitative Health Research17: 264–275.
21.
GoffmanE (1959) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life, New York: Anchor/Doubleday.
22.
GoffmanE (1986) Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity, New York: Simon and Schuster.
23.
GordonHR (2009) We Fight to Win: Inequality and the Politics of Youth Activism, New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
24.
GriffithsM (2010) The use of online methodologies in data collection for gambling and gaming addictions. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction8: 8–20.
25.
GuentherKM (2009) The politics of names: Rethinking the methodological and ethical significance of naming people, organizations, and places. Qualitative Research9: 411–421.
26.
HargittaiE (2007) A framework for studying differences in people’s digital media uses. In: KutscherNOttoH-U (eds) Cyberworld Unlimited, Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften/GWV Fachverlage GmbH, pp. 121–137.
27.
Hmielowski JD, Feldman L, Myers TA, et al. (2013) An attack on science? Media use, trust in scientists, and perceptions of global warming. Public Understanding of Science. Published online first, 3 April 2013. DOI: 10.1177/0963662513480091.
28.
HutchinsonSMarsiglioWCohanM (2002) Interviewing young men about sex and procreation: Methodological issues. Qualitative Health Research12: 42–60.
29.
KendallL (2002) Hanging Out in the Virtual Pub: Masculinities and Relationships Online, Berkeley: University of California Press.
30.
KongTMahoneyDPlummerK (2002) Queering the interview. In: GubriumJFHolsteinJA (eds) Handbook of Interview Research: Context and Method, Thousand Oaks: SAGE, pp. 239–258.
31.
KornblumW (1974) Blue Collar Community, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
32.
LareauA (1996) Common problems in field work: A personal essay. In: LareauAShultzJ (eds) Journeys through Ethnography: Realistic Accounts of Fieldwork, Boulder: Westview.
33.
LareauA (2000) My wife can tell me who I know: Methodological and conceptual problems in studying fathers. Qualitative Sociology23: 407–433.
34.
LibrettMPerroneD (2010) Apples and oranges: Ethnography and the IRB. Qualitative Research10: 729–747.
35.
LivingstoneS (2008) Taking risky opportunities in youthful content creation: Teenagers’ use of social networking sites for intimacy, privacy and self-expression. New Media & Society10: 393–411.
36.
LoeM (2004) The Rise of Viagra: How the Little Blue Pill Changed Sex in America, New York: New York University.
37.
LukerK (1985) Abortion and the Politics of Motherhood, Berkeley: University of California Press.
38.
MayTSilvermanRD (2003) ‘Clustering of exemptions’ as a collective action threat to herd immunity. Vaccine21: 1048–1051.
39.
MyerhoffB (1994) Number Our Days: Culture and Community among Elderly Jews in an American Ghetto, New York: Meridian.
40.
NaderL (1972) Up the anthropologist: Perspectives gained from studying up. In: HymesD (ed.) Reinventing Anthropology, New York: Pantheon Books, pp. 285–311.
41.
OmerSBSalmonDOrensteinWA (2009) Vaccine refusal, mandatory immunization, and the risks of vaccine-preventable diseases. The New England Journal of Medicine360: 1981–1988.
42.
OstranderSA (1993) ‘Surely you’re not in this just to be helpful’: Access, rapport, and interviews in three studies of elites. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography22: 7–27.
43.
Pascoe C (2009) Email communication using blogs/Facebook to gather data.
44.
PierceJL (1995) Reflections on fieldwork in a complex organization: Lawyers, ethnographic authority, and lethal weapons. In: HertzRImberJB (eds) Studying Elites Using Qualitative Methods, Thousand Oaks: SAGE, pp. 94–110.
45.
ReichJA (2005) Fixing Families: Parents, Power, and the Child Welfare System, New York: Routledge.
46.
ReichJA (2013) Emerging breasts, bellies, and bodies of knowledge. In: BrownTMDrebyJ (eds) Family and Work in Everyday Ethnography, Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
47.
ReidE (1996) Informed consent in the study of on-line communities: A reflection on the effects of computer-mediated social research. The Information Society: An International Journal12: 169–174.
48.
Scheper-HughesN (2000) Ire in Ireland. Ethnography1: 117–140.
49.
SchwalbeMWolkimirM (2001) The masculine self as problem and resource in interview studies of men. Men and Masculinities4: 90–103.
50.
SmithPChuSBarkerL (2004) Children who have received no vaccines: Who are they and where do they live?Pediatrics114: 187–195.
51.
StaceyJ (1988) Can there be a feminist ethnography?Women’s Studies International Forum11: 21–27.
52.
StackCB (1973) All Our Kin: Strategies for Survival in a Black Community, New York: Basic Books.
53.
StanfieldJII (1994) Ethnic modeling in qualitative research. In: DenzinNLincolnY (eds) Handbook of Qualitative Research, Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, pp. 175–188.
TaraszowTAristodemouEShittaG (2010) Disclosure of personal and contact information by young people in social networking sites: An analysis using Facebook profiles as an example. International Journal of Media & Cultural Politics6: 81–101.
van DeursenAvan DijkJ (2011) Internet skills and the digital divide. New Media & Society13: 893–911.
58.
VenkateshS (2009) Gang Leader for a Day: A Rogue Sociologist Takes to the Streets, New York: Penguin Books.
59.
Verma IM (2014) Editorial expression of concern: Experimental evidence of massive scale emotional contagion through social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Available at: http://www.pnas.org/content/111/29/10779.1.full (accessed 19 September 2014).
60.
WaltherJBHeideBVDKimS-Y (2008) The role of friends’ appearance and behavior on evaluations of individuals on Facebook: Are we known by the company we keep?Human Communication Research34: 28–49.
61.
WellmanBBoaseJChenW (2002) The networked nature of community: Online and offline. IT & Society1: 151–165.
62.
WhyteW (1993) Street Corner Society: The Social Structure of an Italian Slum, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
63.
WynnJ (2011) The Tour Guide, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
64.
ZhaoSGrasmuckSMartinJ (2008) Identity construction on Facebook: Digital empowerment in anchored relationships. Computers in Human Behavior24: 1816–1836.
