■ Although the civil restraining order is the most commonly sought legal initiative to combat intimate partner violence in British Columbia (BC), no known qualitative research has assessed the application process, and previous quantitative research presents mixed findings. Using interviews, observations, and textual analyses, this institutional ethnography critically analyzes the civil restraining order application process in the BC Provincial Court. Particular attention is paid to disjunctures between abused women's experiential knowledge and what becomes formally known to practitioners who manage their cases. Findings unveil that abused women's lived experience with violence is transformed and shaped into accounts in which their safety needs disappear. Court practitioners become immersed in textually mediated activity within a legal ruling apparatus that emphasizes timely completion of a large quantity of cases, with little or no commitment to quality solutions.
Adams, J. (2005) `Civil Restraining Order Application Processing in the British Columbia Provincial Court: An Institutional Ethnography', MA thesis, Department of Sociology, University of Victoria.
2.
Bachman, R. and L. Saltzman (1995) `Violence against Women: Estimates from the Redesigned Survey', Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report, Washington, DC.
3.
Brownridge, D.A. and S.S. Halli (2001) Explaining Violence Against Women in Canada. Maryland, MDLexington Books.
4.
Bunge, V.P. and A. Levett (1998) Family Violence: A Statistical Profile. Ottawa: Statistics Canada, Ministry of Industry.
5.
Buzawa, E. and C. Buzawa (1996) Domestic Violence: The Criminal Justice Response . Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
6.
Campbell, J. (2004) `Helping Women Understand their Risk in Situations of Intimate Partner Violence', Journal of Interpersonal Violence19(12): 1464-77.
7.
Campbell, M. and F. Gregor (2002) Mapping Social Relations: A Primer in Doing Institutional Ethnography. Ontario: Garamond Press .
8.
Dauvergne, M. (2001) `Homicide in Canada, 2001', Canadian Centre for Justice Statistics, Statistics Canada, Juristat22(7).
9.
Davis, R. and B. Smith (1995) `Domestic Violence Reforms: Empty Promises or Fulfilled Expectations?', Crime and Delinquency41(4): 541-52.
10.
Fischer, K. and M. Rose (1995) `When "Enough is Enough": Battered Women's Decision Making around Court Orders of Protection', Crime and Delinquency41(4): 414-29.
11.
Ford, D. (1991) `Prosecution as a Victim Power Resource: A Note on Empowering Women in Violent Conjugal Relationships', Law and Society Review25(2): 313-34.
12.
Grahame, P. (1998) `Ethnography, Institutions, and the Problematic of the Everyday World', Human Studies21: 347-60.
13.
Hart, B. (1996) `Battered Women and the Criminal Justice System' , in E. Buzawa and C. Buzawa (eds) Do Restraining Orders Work?, 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
14.
Jaffe, P. and C. Burris (1981) The Response of the Criminal Justice System to Wife Abuse. Ottawa: Solicitor General of Canada.
15.
Johnson, M. and J. Leone (2005) `The Differential Effects of Intimate Terrorism and Situational Couple Violence', Journal of Family Issues26(3): 322-49.
16.
Jordan, C. (2004) `Intimate Partner Violence and the Justice System' , Journal of Interpersonal Violence19(12): 1412-34.
17.
Lewis, R., R. Dobash, R. Emerson Dobash and K. Cavanagh (2000) `Protection, Prevention, Rehabilitation or Justice? Women's Use of the Law to Challenge Domestic Violence', International Review of Victimology7(1-3): 179-205.
18.
Malecha, A., J. McFarlane, J. Gist, K. Watson, E. Batten, I. Hall and S. Smith (2003) `Applying For and Dropping a Protection Order: A Study with 150 Women', Criminal Justice Policy Review14(4): 486-504.
19.
McCoy, L. (2007) `Institutional Ethnography and Constructionism' , in J.A. Holstein and J.F. Gubrium (eds) Handbook of Constructionist Research, pp. 701-14. New York: Guilford .
20.
McKendy, J. (1992) `Ideological Practices and the Management of Emotions: The Case of "Wife Abusers"', Critical Sociology19(2): 60-80.
21.
McMahon, M. and E. Pence (1995) `Doing More Harm than Good? Some Cautions on Visitation Centers', in E. Peled, J. Edleson and P. Jaffe (eds) Ending the Cycle of Violence. Community Responses to Children of Battered Women, pp. 186-206. London: SAGE.
22.
Ministry of Attorney General (no date) `Ex Parte Family Applications', in Judge Neal (ed.) Province of British Columbia, Court Services.
23.
Ministry of Attorney General (2004) `Family Court Manual', in Province of British Columbia, Court Services.
24.
Morrow, M., O. Hankivsky and C. Varcoe (2004) `Women and Violence: The Effects of Dismantling the Welfare State', Critical Social Policy24(3): 358-84.
25.
Peacock, T. and E. Pence (2002) `Community Based Analysis of the US Legal System's Interventions in Domestic Abuse Cases Involving Indigenous Women', in Mending the Sacred Hoop. Duluth: Minnesota Program Development, Inc.
26.
Pence, E. (1997) `Safety for Battered Women in a Textually Mediated Legal System', PhD dissertation, Sociology in Education, University of Toronto.
27.
Pence, E. (2001) `Safety for Battered Women in a Textually Mediated Legal System', Studies in Cultures, Organizations and Societies7: 199-229.
28.
Provincial Court of BC (2004) `Family Relations Act', RSBC 1996 Chapter 128, British Columbia: Queens Printer , available online at: [http://www.qp.gov.bc.ca/statreg/stat/f/96128_01.htm#section24 ], accessed June 2008.
29.
Ptacek, J. (1995) Disorder in the Courts: Judicial Demeanor and Women's Experience Seeking Restraining Orders. Waltham, MA: Brandeis University.
30.
Ridzi, F. (2003) `Processing Private Lives in Public: An Institutional Ethnography of Front-Line Welfare Intake Staff Post Welfare Reform', PhD dissertation, Sociology, Syracuse University.
31.
Schneider, E. (2000) Battered Women & Feminist Lawmaking. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
32.
Smith, D. (1990a) The Conceptual Practices of Power: A Feminist Sociology of Knowledge. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
33.
Smith, D. (1990b) Texts, Facts, and Femininity: Exploring the Relations of Ruling. London: Routledge.
34.
Smith, D. (1999) Writing the Social: Critique, Theory, and Investigations . Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
35.
Smith, D. (2001) `Texts and the Ontology of Organizations and Institutions' , Studies in Cultures, Organizations and Societies7(2): 159-98.
36.
Smith, D. (2005) Institutional Ethnography: A Sociology for People . Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press .
37.
Smith, D. (2006) Institutional Ethnography as Practice. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
38.
Smith, D. and J. Whalen (1995) `Texts in Action', unpublished paper, 24 pp.
39.
Statistics Canada (2001) in Ministry of Women's Equality ed. Canadian Advisory Council on the Status of Women.
40.
Statistics Canada (2005) Family Violence in Canada: A Statistical Profile , K. Au Coin, ed. Ottawa: Canadian Centre for Justice Statistics.
41.
Wan, A. (2000) `Battered Women in the Restraining Order Process. Observations on a Court Advocacy Program', Violence Against Women6(6): 606-32.
42.
Wilson, A. and E. Pence (n.d.) `An Indigenous Assessment. Community-Based Assessment of the US Legal Systems' Interventions with Native Women Who Have Been Battered' , The Native Women's Research Project.
43.
Winner, K. (1996) Divorced from Justice: The Abuse of Women and Children by Divorce Lawyers and Judges. New York: Regan Books/HarperCollins.
44.
Zorza, J. (1995) `How Abused Women Can Use the Law to Help Protect Children', in E. Peled, J. Edleson and P. Jaffe (eds) Ending the Cycle of Violence. Community Responses to Children of Battered Women, pp. 147-69. London: SAGE.
