Abstract
Digitalisation supports the professionalisation and innovation of rural entrepreneurship in the Global South, enabling it to adapt to various transformations, whether driven by different necessities, or opportunities. This study uses neo-endogenous development theory (NED) to understand local differences in meaningful digital adoption and usage, considering different rural entrepreneurial motivations – necessity and opportunity-based entrepreneurial activity. We conducted interviews in two entrepreneurial communities in Bali, Indonesia: Kamasan, which produces traditional cultural products, and Kintamani, which produces coffee. The local variety of endogenous resources in both communities drives the different adoption patterns of entrepreneurs. In turn, these diverging digital adoption patterns determine whether a community is open to more exogenous resources through digital channels, highlighting the Matthew effect of digitalisation. Our findings show that the motives for running entrepreneurial activity refer to similar digital adoption patterns in rural communities - in which necessity-based entrepreneurs have limitations in adopting digital technology and opportunity-based entrepreneurs have more freedom in absorbing external knowledge and innovation through digital technology adoption. Lastly, we propose that future research into digitalisation in rural economies in the Global South should work from a diversified perspective, recognising the differences between – and within – rural communities.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
