The purpose of this article is to focus on the role of the legal structure of ventures for the event of the entrepreneurial exit. Specifically, this study is to reveal the different effects of incorporated and non-incorporated legal structures of ventures on diverse exit routes. Using the Kauffman Firm Survey, this study investigated the relationship between the legal structure of ventures and their exit routes with a sample of 901 single-founder start-ups that were founded in 2004 and exited during 2005 to 2011 period. The finding of this study confirmed that ventures with an incorporated legal structure were less likely to exit by sale than ventures with a non-incorporated legal structure. While little research has considered the legal structure of ventures as a predictor of different exit routes, this study empirically suggests the importance of considering the forms of the legal status of ventures in studying entrepreneurial exit routes.
AjzenI (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes50(2): 179–211.
2.
AldrichHAusterER (1986) Even dwarfs started small: liabilities of age and size and their strategic implications. In: CummingsLLBarryMS (eds), Research in Organizational Behavior. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, pp. 165–198.
3.
AmaralAMBaptistaRLimaF (2009) Becoming an ex-entrepreneur: firm performance and the sell-out or dissolution decision. In: SmallboneDLandströmHJones-EvansD (eds), Entrepreneurship and Growth in Local, Regional and National Economies: Frontiers in European Entrepreneurship Research. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 157–183.
4.
AndersonPTushmanML (2001) Organizational environments and industry exit: the effects of uncertainty, munificence and complexity. Industrial and Corporate Change10(3): 675–711.
5.
ArthursJDBusenitzLW (2003) The boundaries and limitations of agency theory and stewardship theory in the venture capitalist/entrepreneur relationship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice28(2): 145–162.
6.
BaeTJQianSMiaoC, et al. (2014) The relationship between entrepreneurship education and entrepreneurial intentions: a meta-analytic review. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice38(2): 217–254.
7.
BalcaenSManigartSBuyzeJ, et al. (2012) Firm exit after distress: differentiating between bankruptcy, voluntary liquidation and M&A. Small Business Economics39(4): 949–975.
8.
BatesT (2005) Analysis of young, small firms that have closed: delineating successful from unsuccessful closures. Journal of Business Venturing20(3): 343–358.
9.
BattistiMOkamuroH (2010) Selling, passing on or closing? Determinants of entrepreneurial intentions on exit modes. Massey U. College of Business Research Paper No27. Available at: SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1711336 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1711336 (accessed 1 August 2018).
10.
BeckerGS (1964) Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis. New York: Columbia University Press.
11.
BelkRW (1988) Possessions and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research15(2): 139–168.
12.
BesserTLMillerNJ (2013) Community matters: successful entrepreneurship in remote rural US locations. The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation14(1): 15–27.
13.
BoekerW (1989) Strategic change: the effects of founding and history. Academy of Management Journal32(3): 489–515.
14.
BrüderlJSchüsslerR (1990) Organizational mortality: the liabilities of newness and adolescence. Administrative Science Quarterly35(3): 530–547.
15.
BrüderlJPreisendörferPZieglerR (1992) Survival chances of newly founded business organizations. American Sociological Review57(2): 227–242.
16.
BrunningeONordqvistM (2004) Ownership structure, board composition and entrepreneurship: evidence from family firms and venture-capital-backed firms. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research10(1/2): 85–105.
17.
BrutonGDAhlstromDLiHL (2010) Institutional theory and entrepreneurship: where are we now and where do we need to move in the future?Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice34(3): 421–440.
18.
CardonMSZietsmaCSaparitoP, et al. (2005) A tale of passion: new insights into entrepreneurship from a parenthood metaphor. Journal of Business Venturing20(1): 23–45.
19.
CassarG (2007) Money, money, money? A longitudinal investigation of entrepreneur career reasons, growth preferences and achieved growth. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development19(1): 89–107.
20.
CefisEMarsiliO (2012) Going, going, gone. Exit forms and the innovative capabilities of firms. Research Policy41(5): 795–807.
ColemanSCoteiCFarhatJ (2013) A resource-based view of new firm survival: new perspectives on the role of industry and exit route. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship18(1): 1–25.
23.
CorbettaGSalvatoC (2004) Self-serving or self-actualizing? Models of man and agency costs in different types of family firms: a commentary on “comparing the agency costs of family and non-family firms: conceptual issues and exploratory evidence.”Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice28(4): 355–362.
24.
CoteiCFarhatJ (2018) The M&A exit outcomes of new, young firms. Small Business Economics50(3): 545–567.
25.
DailyCMDaltonDR (1992) The relationship between governance structure and corporate performance in entrepreneurial firms. Journal of Business Venturing7(5): 375–386.
26.
DavidssonP (1989) Entrepreneurship and after? A study of growth willingness in small firms. Journal of Business Venturing4(3): 211–226.
27.
DavidssonPHonigB (2003) The role of social and human capital among nascent entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing18(3): 301–331.
28.
DavidssonPKirchhoffBHatemiJA, et al. (2002) Empirical analysis of business growth factors using Swedish data. Journal of Small Business Management40(4): 332–349.
29.
DehlenTZellwegerTKammerlanderN, et al. (2014) The role of information asymmetry in the choice of entrepreneurial exit routes. Journal of Business Venturing29(2): 193–209.
30.
DelmarFWiklundJ (2008) The effect of small business managers’ growth motivation on firm growth: a longitudinal study. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice32(3): 437–457.
31.
DemsetzHLehnK (1985) The structure of corporate ownership: causes and consequences. Journal of Political Economy93(6): 1155–1177.
32.
DeTienneDR (2010) Entrepreneurial exit as a critical component of the entrepreneurial process: theoretical development. Journal of Business Venturing25(2): 203–215.
33.
DeTienneDRCardonMS (2012) Impact of founder experience on exit intentions. Small Business Economics38(4): 351–374.
34.
DeTienneDRWennbergK (2015) Research Handbook of Entrepreneurial Exit. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
35.
DeTienneDRMcKelvieAChandlerGN (2015) Making sense of entrepreneurial exit strategies: a typology and test. Journal of Business Venturing30(2): 255–272.
36.
EdelmanLFManolovaTSBrushCG (2008) Entrepreneurship education: correspondence between practices of nascent entrepreneurs and textbook prescriptions for success. Academy of Management Learning and Education7(1): 56–70.
37.
EisenhardtKM (1989) Agency theory: an assessment and review. Academy of Management Review14(1): 57–74.
38.
FarhatJMatusikSRobbA, et al. (2018) New directions in entrepreneurship research with the Kauffman Firm Survey. Small Business Economics50(3): 521–532.
39.
GimenoJFoltaTBCooperAC, et al. (1997) Survival of the fittest? Entrepreneurial human capital and the persistence of underperforming firms. Administrative Science Quarterly42(4): 750–783.
40.
GortonM (2000) Overcoming the structure–agency divide in small business research. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research6(5): 276–292.
41.
HarhoffDStahlKWoywodeM (1998) Legal form, growth and exit of West German firms empirical results for manufacturing, construction, trade and service industries. The Journal of Industrial Economics46(4): 453–488.
42.
HeaddB (2003) Redefining business success: distinguishing between closure and failure. Small Business Economics21(1): 51–61.
43.
HermansJVanderstraetenJvan WitteloostuijnA, et al. (2015) Ambitious entrepreneurship: a review of growth aspirations, intentions, and expectations. In: KatzJCorbettAC (eds), Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence and Growth. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp. 127–160.
44.
HesselsJGriloIThurikR, et al. (2011) Entrepreneurial exit and entrepreneurial engagement. Journal of Evolutionary Economics21(3): 447–471.
45.
HesselsJRietveldNThurikR, et al. (2017) Depression and entrepreneurial exit. Academy of Management Perspectives32(2): 182–206.
46.
HesselsJVan GelderenMThurikR (2008) Entrepreneurial aspirations, motivations, and their drivers. Small Business Economics31(3): 323–339.
JonesGRButlerJE (1992) Managing internal corporate entrepreneurship: an agency theory perspective. Journal of Management18(4): 733–749.
49.
JustoRDeTienneDRSiegerP (2015) Failure or voluntary exit? Reassessing the female underperformance hypothesis. Journal of Business Venturing30(6): 775–792.
50.
LeeB (2019) Human capital and labor: the effect of entrepreneur characteristics on venture success. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research25(1): 29–49.
51.
LeeSMLeeB (2015) Entrepreneur characteristics and the success of venture exit: an analysis of single-founder start-ups in the US. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal11(4): 891–905.
52.
LevesqueMMinnitiM (2006) The effect of aging on entrepreneurial behavior. Journal of Business Venturing21(2): 177–194.
53.
MataJPortugalP (2002) The survival of new domestic and foreign-owned firms. Strategic Management Journal23(4): 323–343.
54.
McGrathRGMacMillanIC (2000) The Entrepreneurial Mindset: Strategies for Continuously Creating Opportunity in an Age of Uncertainty. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.
55.
NorthDC (1990) Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. New York: Cambridge University Press.
56.
NyarkuKMOduroS (2018) Effect of legal and regulatory framework on SMEs growth in the Accra Metropolis of Ghana. The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation19(3): 207–217.
57.
PahnkeAWelterF (2018) The German Mittelstand: antithesis to Silicon Valley entrepreneurship?Small Business Economics52: 345–358. Available at:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-018-0095-4 (accessed 15 August 2018).
58.
PettyJ (1997) Harvesting firm value: process and results. In: SextonDLSmilorRW (eds), Entrepreneurship 2000. Chicago, IL: Upstart Publishing Company, pp. 71–98.
59.
PierceJLKostovaTDirksKT (2001) Toward a theory of psychological ownership in organizations. Academy of Management Review26(2): 298–310.
60.
RomanoCATanewskiGASmyrniosKX (2001) Capital structure decision making: a model for family business. Journal of Business Venturing16(3): 285–310.
61.
RowleyTJ (1997) Moving beyond dyadic ties: a network theory of stakeholder influences. Academy of Management Review22(4): 887–910.
62.
SalvatoCChiricoFSharmaP (2010) A farewell to the business: championing exit and continuity in entrepreneurial family firms. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development22(3-4): 321–348.
63.
SarkarMBEchambadiRAgarwalR, et al. (2006) The effect of the innovative environment on exit of entrepreneurial firms. Strategic Management Journal27(6): 519–539.
64.
ShaneS (2000) Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities. Organization Science11(4): 448–469.
65.
SwierczekFWHaTT (2003) Entrepreneurial orientation, uncertainty avoidance and firm performance: an analysis of Thai and Vietnamese SMEs. The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation4(1): 46–58.
66.
TurkTASheltonL (2006) Growth aspirations, risk, gender and legal form: a look at the services industries. Academy of Entrepreneurship Journal12(1): 35.
67.
Van PraagCM (2003) Business survival and success of young small business owners. Small Business Economics21(1): 1–17.
68.
Van TeeffelenLUhlanerLM (2013) Firm resource characteristics and human capital as predictors of exit choice: an exploratory study of SMEs. Entrepreneurship Research Journal3(1): 84–108.
69.
WennbergKDeTienneDR (2014) What do we really mean when we talk about ‘exit’? A critical review of research on entrepreneurial exit. International Small Business Journal32(1): 4–16.
70.
WennbergKWiklundJDeTienneDR, et al. (2010) Reconceptualizing entrepreneurial exit: divergent exit routes and their drivers. Journal of Business Venturing25(4): 361–375.
71.
WestheadPWrightM (1998) Novice, portfolio, and serial founders: Are they different?Journal of Business Venturing13(3): 173–204.
72.
WiklundJHatakIPatzeltH, et al. (2018) Mental disorders in the entrepreneurial context: when being different can be an advantage. Academy of Management Perspectives32(2): 182–206.
73.
WinterMDanesSMKohSK, et al. (2004) Tracking family businesses and their owners over time: panel attrition, manager departure and business demise. Journal of Business Venturing19(4): 535–559.
