How to succeed with high quality randomised clinical trials in clinical orthodontic research

Abstract

One goal of producing relevant clinical research is to ensure that evidence-based research results are transformed into everyday clinical practice that help clinicians deliver high quality care. It also involves ensuring that the individual patient receives the most effective and least risky treatment, ultimately leading to an optimal treatment outcome both in the short and long term. Some fundamentals of evidence-based dentistry are highlighted with focus on performing orthodontic randomised controlled trials.

Keywords

Randomised controlled trials clinical trials orthodontic treatment laboratory trials orthodontic materials bond strength scientific methods

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abdulraheem

Bondemark

(2018a) The reporting of blinding in orthodontic randomized controlled trials: where do we stand? European Journal of Orthodontics 41: 54–58.

Abdulraheem

Bondemark

(2018b) Hawthorne effect reporting in orthodontic randomized controlled trials: truth or myth? Blessing or curse? European Journal of Orthodontics 40: 475–479.

Ackerman

(2004) Evidence-based orthodontics for the 21^st century. Journal of the American Dental Association 135: 162–167.

Bondemark

Abdulraheem

(2018) Intention to treat (ITT) analysis as reported in orthodontic randomized controlled trials: evaluations of methodology and recommendations for the accurate use of ITT analysis and handling dropouts. European Journal of Orthodontics 40: 409–413.

Bondemark

Ruf

(2015) Randomized controlled trial: the gold standard or an unobtainable fallacy. European Journal of Orthodontics 37: 457–461.

Braunholtz

Edwards

Lilford

(2001) Are randomized clinical trials good for us (in the short term)? Evidence for a “trial effect”. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 54: 217–224.

Heritier

Gebski

Keech

(2003) Inclusion of patients in clinical trial analysis: the intention-to-treat principle. Medical Journal of Australia 179: 438–440.

Ioannidis

Haidich

Pappa

et al (2001) Comparison of evidence of treatment effects in randomized and nonrandomized studies. Journal of the American Medical Association 286: 821–830.

Jüni

Altman

Egger

(2001) Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials. British Medical Journal 323: 42–46.

10.

Lempesi

Koletsi

Fleming

et al (2014). The reporting quality of randomized controlled trials in orthodontics. Journal of Evidence Based Dentistry and Practice 14: 46–52.

11.

Pandis

(2011) The evidence pyramid and introduction to randomized controlled trials. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 140: 446–447.

12.

Pandis

Shamseer

Kokich

et al (2014) Active implementation strategy of CONSORT adherence by a dental specialty journal improved randomized clinical trial reporting. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 67: 1044–1048.

13.

Pandis

Walsh

Polychronopoulou

et al (2013) Split-mouth designs in orthodontics: an overview with applications to orthodontic clinical trials. European Journal of Orthodontics 35: 783–789.

14.

Sackett

Rosenberg

Gray

et al (1996). Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t. British Medical Journal 312: 71–72.

15.

Schulz

Altman

Moher

(2010) CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 3: 834–840.

16.

Wertz

(1995) Intention to treat: once randomized, always analyzed. Clinical Aphasiology 23: 57–64.