This study examines trust in the domestic government and the European Union (EU) across semi-presidential EU member states. The identity-based perspective suggests that European integration engenders apprehension regarding the transfer of national power and the erosion of national identity, resulting in a lack of trust in politics at the national and European levels. We argue that public trust will be rebuilt when the relationship between the president and the cabinet is characterised by intense political contestation. Intra-executive conflict signals to the public that a popularly elected president may influence the implementation of EU policies at the domestic level and apply checks and balances within the executive branch, thus protecting national identity and restoring domestic decision-making capacity. We examine arguments using data from 32 Eurobarometer survey waves.
AbadieADiamondAHainmuellerJ (2015) Comparative politics and the synthetic control method. American Journal of Political Science59(2): 495–510.
2.
AkkermanAZasloveASpruytB (2017) We the people” or “we the peoples”? A comparison of support for the populist radical right and populist radical left in the Netherlands. Swiss Political Science Review23(4): 377–403.
3.
AlganYGurievSPapaioannouE, et al. (2017) The European trust crisis and the rise of populism. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity208: 309–382.
4.
AndersonCJ (1998) When in doubt, use proxies: Attitudes toward domestic politics and support for European integration. Comparative Political Studies31(5): 569–601.
5.
AresMCekaBKriesiH (2017) Diffuse support for the European union: Spillover effects of the politicization of the European integration process at the domestic level. Journal of European Public Policy24(8): 1091–1115.
6.
ArmingeonKCekaB (2014) The loss of trust in the European Union during the Great Recession since 2007: The role of heuristics from the national political system. European Union Politics15(1): 82–107.
7.
ArpinoBObydenkovaAV (2020) Democracy and political trust before and after the Great Recession 2008: The European Union and the United Nations. Social Indicators Research148(2): 395–415.
BoscoAVerneyS (2012) Electoral epidemic: The political cost of economic crisis in Southern Europe, 2010–11. South European Society and Politics17(2): 129–154.
10.
De VreeseCHBoomgaardenHGSemetkoHA (2008) Hard and soft: Public support for Turkish membership in the EU. European Union Politics9(4): 511–530.
11.
De VriesCEEdwardsEE (2009) Taking Europe to its extremes: Extremist parties and public euroscepticism. Party Politics15(1): 5–28.
12.
Dotti SaniGMMagistroB (2016) Increasingly unequal? The economic crisis, social inequalities and trust in the European parliament in 20 European countries. European Journal of Political Research55(2): 246–264.
13.
DrakosKKallandranisCKaridisS (2017) A note on trust in the ECB in the era of sovereign debt crisis. Applied Economics Letters25(6): 366–368.
14.
DrakosKKallandranisCKaridisS (2019) Determinants of trust in institutions in times of crisis: Survey-based evidence from the European Union. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies57(6): 1228–1246.
15.
EcevitYAKarakoçE (2017) The perils of semi-presidentialism: Confidence in political institutions in contemporary democracies. International Political Science Review38(1): 4–20.
16.
ElgieR (1999) The politics of semi-presidentialism. In: ElgieR (eds) Semi-Presidentialism in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1–21.
17.
ElgieR (2017) Presidential power and president cabinet conflict. In: ElgieR (eds) Political Leadership: A Pragmatic Institutionalist Approach. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 127–149.
18.
FligsteinNPolyakovaASandholtzW (2012) European integration, nationalism and European identity. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies50(s1): 106–122.
19.
FosterCFriedenJ (2017) Crisis of trust: Socio-economic determinants of Europeans’ confidence in government. European Union Politics18(4): 511–535.
20.
GarryJTilleyJ (2009) The macroeconomic factors conditioning the impact of identity on attitudes towards the EU. European Union Politics10(3): 361–379.
21.
GodefroidtALangerAMeulemanB (2017) Developing political trust in a developing country: The impact of institutional and cultural factors on political trust in Ghana. Democratization24(6): 906–928.
22.
Gómez-ReinoMLlamazaresI (2013) The populist radical right and European integration: A comparative analysis of party–voter links. West European Politics36(4): 789–816.
23.
HahmHHilpertDKönigT (2020) Institutional reform and public attitudes toward EU decision making. European Journal of Political Research59(3): 599–623.
24.
HarteveldEVan der MeerTDe VriesCE (2013) In Europe we trust? Exploring three logics of trust in the European Union. European Union Politics14(4): 542–565.
25.
HoboltSB (2012) Citizen satisfaction with democracy in the European Union. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies50(s1): 88–105.
26.
HoogheLMarksG (2005) Calculation, community and cues: Public opinion on European integration. European Union Politics6(4): 419–443.
27.
HoogheLMarksG (2009) A postfunctionalist theory of European integration: From permissive consensus to constraining dissensus. British Journal of Political Science39(1): 1–23.
28.
HoogheMOkolikjM (2020) The long-term effects of the economic crisis on political trust in Europe: Is there a negativity bias in the relation between economic performance and political support?Comparative European Politics18(6): 879–898.
29.
HoogheMMarienSPauwelsT (2011) Where do distrusting voters turn if there is no viable exit or voice option? The impact of political trust on electoral behaviour in the Belgian regional elections of June 2009. Government and Opposition46(2): 245–273.
30.
JalaliC (2011) The president is not a passenger: Portugal’s evolving semi-presidentialism. In: ElgieRMoestrupSWuYS (eds) Semi-Presidentialism and Democracy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 156–173.
31.
JastramskisMPukelisL (2024) Routine presidential activism by going public under semi-presidential and parliamentary regimes. Political Studies Review22(4): 740–761.
32.
KallandranisC (2019) The interaction of citizen’s trust between the European Commission and national politics during the crisis. Risk Governance and Control: Financial Markets & Institutions9(4): 8–19.
33.
KaasaAAndrianiL (2022) Determinants of institutional trust: The role of cultural context. Journal of Institutional Economics18(1): 45–65.
34.
KirschkeL (2007) Semipresidentialism and the perils of power-sharing in neopatrimonial states. Comparative Political Studies40(11): 1372–1394.
35.
KökerP (2017) Presidential Activism and Veto Power in Central and Eastern Europe. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
36.
KotzianP (2011) Public support for liberal democracy. International Political Science Review32(1): 23–41.
37.
KritzingerS (2003) The influence of the nation-state on individual support for the European Union. European Union Politics4(2): 219–241.
38.
KroknesVFJakobsenTGGrønningLM (2016) Economic performance and political trust: The impact of the financial crisis on European citizens. European Societies17(5): 700–723.
39.
KujanenM (2024) Popularity and powers: Comparing public opinion on presidents in semi-presidential and presidential regimes. European Political Science Review16(2): 225–241.
40.
KujanenMKoskimaaVRaunioT (2025) Confrontational or ‘statespersonlike’ style? Examining Finnish and French presidents’ public speeches and messages, 2000–2020. Political Studies Review23(1): 14–32.
41.
LuedtkeA (2005) European integration, public opinion and immigration policy: Testing the impact of national identity. European Union Politics6(1): 83–112.
42.
MahlerVATaylorBJWozniakJR (2000) Economics and public support for the European Union: An analysis at the national, regional and individual levels. Polity32(3): 429–453.
43.
MaukM (2020) Rebuilding trust in broken systems? Populist party success and citizens’ trust in democratic institutions. Politics and Governance8(3): 45–58.
44.
McLarenLM (2002) Public support for the European Union: Cost/benefit analysis or perceived cultural threat?The Journal of Politics64(2): 551–566.
MedranoJD (2003) Framing Europe: Attitudes to European Integration in Germany, Spain, and the United Kingdom. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
47.
MoestrupSSedeliusT (2025) Presidential activism in sub-Saharan Africa: Explaining variation among semi-presidential countries. Political Studies Review23(1): 97–113.
48.
MuñozJTorcalMBonetE (2011) Institutional trust and multilevel government in the European union: Congruence or compensation?European Union Politics12(4): 551–574.
49.
NetoOAStrømK (2006) Breaking the parliamentary chain of delegation: Presidents and non-partisan cabinet members in European democracies. British Journal of Political Science36(4): 619–643.
50.
NikolovaMNikolaevB (2017) Does joining the EU make you happy? Evidence from Bulgaria and Romania. Journal of Happiness Studies18: 1593–1623.
ProtsykO (2006) Intra-executive competition between president and prime minister: Patterns of institutional conflict and cooperation under semi-presidentialism. Political Studies54(2): 219–244.
53.
RaunioT (2012) Semi-presidentialism and European integration: Lessons from Finland for constitutional design. Journal of European Public Policy19(4): 567–584.
54.
RayL (2003) When parties matter: The conditional influence of party positions on voter opinions about European integration. The Journal of Politics65(4): 978–994.
RooduijnMPirroALPHalikiopoulouD, et al. (2024) The PopuList: A database of populist, far-left, and far-right parties using expert-informed qualitative comparative classification (EiQCC). British Journal of Political Science54(3): 969–978.
58.
Sánchez-CuencaI (2000) The political basis of support for European integration. European Union Politics1(2): 147–171.
59.
SchleiterPMorgan-JonesE (2009) Party government in Europe? Parliamentary and semi-presidential democracies compared. European Journal of Political Research48(5): 665–693.
60.
SchraffDSchimmelfennigF (2019) Eurozone bailouts and national democracy: Detachment or resilience?European Union Politics20(3): 361–383.
61.
SedeliusTMashtalerO (2013) Two decades of semi-presidentialism: Issues of intra-executive conflict in Central and Eastern Europe 1991–2011. East European Politics29(2): 109–134.
62.
TanSJTambyahSK (2011) Generalized trust and trust in institutions in Confucian Asia. Social Indicators Research103: 357–377.
Van der MeerTHakhverdianA (2017) Political trust as the evaluation of process and performance: A cross-national study of 42 European countries. Political Studies65(1): 81–102.
65.
Van ElsasEVan der BrugW (2015) The changing relationship between left–right ideology and euroscepticism, 1973–2010. European Union Politics16(2): 194–215.
66.
Van ErkelPFAVan der MeerTWG (2016) Macroeconomic performance, political trust, and the Great Recession: A multilevel analysis of the effects of within-country fluctuations in macroeconomic performance on political trust in fifteen EU countries, 1999–2011. European Journal of Political Research55(1): 177–197.
67.
VliegenthartRBoomgaardenHGBoumansJW (2011) Changes in political news coverage: Personalization, conflict and negativity in British and Dutch newspapers. In: BrantsKVoltmerK (eds) Political Communication in Postmodern Democracy. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 92–110.
68.
WeßelsB (2007) Discontent and European identity: Three types of euroscepticism. Acta Politica42(2–3): 287–306.
69.
YanH-T (2021) Prime ministerial autonomy and intra-executive conflict under semi-presidentialism. European Political Science Review13(3): 285–306.
70.
ZhangJLiHYangK (2022) A meta-analysis of the government performance‒trust link: Taking cultural and methodological factors into account. Public Administration Review82(1): 39–58.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
