Do citizens that live close to the border of another European country feel more European? We suggest that border proximity affects European identity formation, but that the positive effect of border proximity is confined largely to areas where citizens live close to regions with better quality of government and lower levels of corruption. Using our newly collected individual level and post-coded data from the most recent wave of the European Quality of Government survey, covering over 129,000 respondents in all 27 European Union member countries, we show that citizens that live close to the border of another country express a stronger European identity, all things being equal. Yet the effect is driven largely by citizens that live adjacent to regions with relatively higher/lower quality of government compared to their own region. Our study thereby contributes to a closer understanding of where and why citizens become attached to Europe, and if and how benchmarking institutional performance and quality of government affect citizens’ willingness to belong to, and identify with, Europe.
AgirdagOHuystPVan HoutteM (2012) Determinants of the formation of a European identity among children: Individual-and school-level influences. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies50(2): 198–213.
2.
AllportGClarkKPettigrewT (1954) The nature of prejudice. In Amir Y (1969) contact hypothesis in ethnic relations. Psychological Bulletin71(5): 319.
3.
AmirY (1969) Contact hypothesis in ethnic relations. Psychological bulletin71(5): 319.
4.
AndersonC (1998) When in doubt, use proxies: Attitudes toward domestic politics and support for European integration. Comparative Political Studies31(5): 569–601.
5.
AndersonCTverdovaY (2003) Corruption, political allegiances, and attitudes to-ward government in contemporary democracies. American Journal of Political Science47(1): 91–109.
6.
ArmingeonKLutzP (2020) Muddling between responsiveness and responsibility: The Swiss case of a non-implementation of a constitutional rule. Comparative European Politics18(2): 256–280.
7.
AudikanaAClémentGGumyA (2023) Dispassionate borders: Common patterns of belonging in European cross-border regions. Geopolitics: 1–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2023.2174433.
8.
BågenholmABauhrMGrimesMRothsteinB (2021) The Oxford Handbook of the Quality of Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9.
BaloghP (2014) Perpetual Borders: German-Polish Cross-border Contacts in the Szczecin Area. Stockholm: Stockholm University.
10.
BarberoJ, et al. (2023) Improving government quality in the regions of the EU and its system- wide benefits for cohesion policy. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies61(1): 38–57.
11.
BauhrMCharronN (2018) Why support international redistribution? Corruption and public support for aid in the eurozone. European Union Politics19(2): 233–254.
12.
BauhrMCharronN (2023) ‘All hands on deck’ or separate lifeboats? Public support for European economic solidarity during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of European Public Policy30(6): 1092–1118.
13.
BauhrMCharronN (2020b) The EU as a savior and a saint? Corruption and public support for redistribution. Journal of European Public Policy27(4): 509–527.
14.
BauhrMCharronN (2020a) In god we trust? Identity, institutions and international solidarity in Europe. Journal of Common Market Studies58(5): 1124–1143.
15.
BauteSAbtsKMeulemanB (2019) Public support for European solidarity: Between Euroscepticism and EU agenda preferences?Journal of Common Market Studies57(3): 533–550.
16.
BellucciPSandersDSerricchioF (2012) Explaining European Identity. The Europeanization of National Polities?: Citizenship and Support in a Post-Enlargement Union. New York: Oxford University Press.
17.
BerezinMDıez-MedranoJ (2008) Distance matters: Place, political legitimacy and popular support for European integration. Comparative European Politics6(2): 1–32.
18.
BergbauerS (2018) Explaining European Identity Formation. Cham: Springer.
19.
BorzGBrandenburgHMendezC (2022) The impact of EU cohesion policy on European identity: A comparative analysis of EU regions. European Union Politics23(2): 259–281.
20.
BruterM (2005) Citizens of Europe? the Emergence of a Mass European Identity. New York: Palgrave.
21.
CareyS (2002) Undivided loyalties: Is national identity an obstacle to European integration?European Union Politics3(4): 387–413.
22.
CharronNDijkstraLLapuenteV (2014) Regional governance matters: Quality of government within European Union member states. Regional Studies48(1): 68–90.
23.
CharronNLapuenteVAnnoniP (2019) Measuring quality of government in EU regions across space and time. Papers in Regional Science98(5): 1925–1953.
24.
CharronNLapuenteVBauhrM, et al. (2022) Change and continuity in quality of government: Trends in subnational quality of government in EU member states. Investigaciones Regionales-Journal of Regional Research2022(53): 5–23.
25.
CheckelJ (2001) Why comply? Social learning and European identity change.Inter-national Organization55(3): 553–588.
26.
CheckelJ (2005) International institutions and socialization in Europe: Introduction and framework. International Organization59(4): 801–826.
27.
CheckelJKatzensteinP (2009) European Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28.
CiagliaSFuestCHeinemannF (2020) Fostering European identity. European Integration Studies1(14): 9–25.
29.
CitrinJSidesJ (2004) Can Europe exist without Europeans? Problems of identity in a multinational community. Advances in Political Psychology1(0): 41–70.
30.
ClarkNRohrschneiderR (2021) Tracing the development of nationalist attitudes in the EU. European Union Politics22(2): 181–201.
31.
DaltonRJ (2021) National/European identities and political alignments.European Union Politics22(2): 340–350.
32.
DecovilleADurandF (2019) Exploring cross-border integration in Europe: How do populations cross borders and perceive their neighbours?European Urban and Regional Studies26(2): 134–157.
33.
DeutschK (1953) The growth of nations: Some recurrent patterns of political and social integration. World Politics5(2): 168–195.
34.
DeutschK (1969) Nationalism and its Alternatives. Knopf: Random House.
35.
De VriesCE (2018) Euroscepticism and the Future of European Integration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
36.
European Commission (2017) EU Citizen Report 2017. doi:10.2838/51061..
FabbriniS (2019) Europe’s Future: Decoupling and Reforming.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39.
FerreraMPellegataA (2018) Worker mobility under attack? Explaining labour market chauvinism in the EU. Journal of European Public Policy25(10): 1461–1480.
40.
FligsteinNPolyakovaASandholtzW (2012) European Integration, nationalism and European identity. Journal of Common Market Studies50(51): 106–122.
41.
FligsteinN, et al. (2008) Euroclash: The EU, European identity, and the Future of Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
42.
FosterCFriedenJ (2021) Economic determinants of public support for European integration, 1995–2018. European Union Politics22(2): 266–292.
43.
FuchsDKlingemannHD (2011) Cultural Diversity, European Identity and the Legitimacy of the EU. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
44.
GabelM (1998) Public support for European integration: An empirical test of five theories. The Journal of Politics60(2): 333–354.
45.
GabelMPalmerH (1995) Understanding variation in public support for European integration. European Journal of Political Research27(1): 3–19.
46.
GaertnerS, et al. (1993) The common ingroup identity model: Recategorization and the reduction of intergroup bias. European Review of Social Psychology4(1): 1–26.
47.
GarryJTilleyJ (2009) The macroeconomic factors conditioning the impact of identity on attitudes towards the EU. European Union Politics10(3): 361–379.
48.
GehringK (2022) Can external threats foster a European Union identity? Evidence from Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.The Economic Journal132(644): 1489–1516.
49.
HangartnerD, et al. (2019) Does exposure to the refugee crisis make natives more hostile?American Political Science Review113(2): 442–455.
50.
HoboltSDe VriesCE (2016) Public support for European integration. Annual Review of Political Science19: 413–432.
51.
HoffmannS (1966) Obstinate or obsolete? The fate of the nation-state and the case of Western Europe. Daedalus95(3): 862–915.
52.
HolmesD (2010). Integral Europe: Fast-Capitalism, Multiculturalism, Neofascism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
53.
HoogheLMarksG (2004) Does identity or economic rationality drive public opinion on European integration?Political Science & Politics37(3): 415–420.
54.
HoogheLMarksG (2005) Calculation, community and cues: Public opinion on European integration. European Union Politics6(4): 419–443.
55.
HoogheLMarksG (2009) A postfunctionalist theory of European integration: From permissive consensus to constraining. British Journal of Political Science39(1): 1–23.
56.
HoogheLMarksG (2018) Cleavage theory meets Europe’s crises: Lipset, Rokkan, and the transnational cleavage. Journal of European Public Policy25(1): 109–135.
57.
HooperBKramschO (2004) Cross-Border Governance in the European Union. London: Routledge Publishers.
58.
InglehartR (1970) Cognitive mobilization and European identity. Comparative Politics3(1): 45–70.
59.
InglehartR (1977) Long term trends in mass support for European unification. Government and Opposition12(2): 150–177.
60.
KohliM (2000) The battlegrounds of European identity. European Societies2(2): 113–137.
61.
KoikkalainenSKyleD (2016) Imagining mobility: The prospective cognition question in migration research. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies42(5): 759–776.
62.
KramerDThierrySVan HoorenF (2018) Responding to free movement: Quarantining mobile union citizens in European welfare states. Journal of European Public Policy25(10): 1501–1521.
63.
KriesiH, et al. (2006) Globalization and the transformation of the national political space: Six European countries compared. European Journal of Political Research45(6): 921–956.
64.
KritzingerS (2003) The influence of the nation-state on individual support for the European Union. European Union Politics4(2): 219–241.
65.
KuhnT (2011) Individual transnationalism, globalisation and euroscepticism: An empirical test of Deutsch’s transactionalist theory. European Journal of Political Research50(6): 811–837.
66.
KuhnT (2012) Why educational exchange programmes miss their mark: Cross-border mobility, education and European identity. Journal of Common Market Studies50(6): 994–1010.
67.
KuhnTKammA (2019) The national boundaries of solidarity: A survey experiment on solidarity with unemployed people in the European Union. European Political Science Review11(2): 179–195.
68.
KuhnTNicoliF (2020) Collective identities and the integration of core state powers: Introduction to the special issue. Journal of Common Market Studies58(1): 3–20.
69.
KuhnTStoeckelF (2014) When European integration becomes costly: The euro crisis and public support for European economic governance. Journal of European Public Policy21(4): 624–641.
MazzoleniOPilottiA (2015) The outcry of the periphery? An analysis of Ticino’s no to immigration. Swiss Political Science Review21(1): 63–75.
72.
MazzoniD, et al. (2018) Cross-border mobility, European identity and participation among European adolescents and young adults. European Journal of Developmental Psychology15(3): 324–339.
MuñozJTorcalMBonetE (2011) Institutional trust and multilevel government in the European Union: Congruence or compensation?European Union Politics12(4): 551–574.
75.
NicoliFKuhnTBurgoonB (2020) Collective identities, European solidarity: Identification patterns and preferences for European social insurance.Journal of Common Market Studies58(1): 76–95.
76.
PettigrewT (1998) Intergroup contact theory. Annual Review of Psychology49(1): 65–85.
77.
PettigrewTTroppL (2008) How does intergroup contact reduce prejudice? Meta-analytic tests of three mediators. European Journal of Social Psychology38(6): 922–934.
78.
PratiGCicognaniEMazzoniD (2019) Cross-border friendships and collective European identity: A longitudinal study. European Union Politics20(4): 649–669.
79.
RisseT (2003) The euro between national and European identity.Journal of European Public Policy10(4): 487–505.
80.
RisseT (2015) European Public Spheres.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
81.
RothsteinB (2011) The Quality of Government: Corruption, Social Trust, and Inequality in International Perspective. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
82.
Sánchez-CuencaI (2000) The political basis of support for European integration.European Union Politics1(2): 147–171.
83.
SchildJ (2001) National v. European identities? French and Germans in the European multi-level system. Journal of Common Market Studies39(2): 331–351.
84.
SchmidtSBlaubergerMMartinsenD (2018) Free movement and equal treatment in an unequal union. Journal of European Public Policy25(10): 1391–1402.
85.
ScholtenPGeddesA (2016) The Politics of Migration and Immigration in Europe.Los Angeles: Sage Publishing.
86.
SchraffDSczepanskiR (2022) United or divided in diversity? The heterogeneous effects of ethnic diversity on European and national identities. European Union Politics23(2): 236–258.
87.
TajfelHTurnerJCAustinWGet al. (1979) An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In: HatchMJSchultzM (eds) Organizational Identity: A Reader. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 56–65.
88.
Van HoutumHVan NaerssenT (2002) Bordering, ordering and othering. Tijdschrift Voor Economische en Sociale Geografie93(2): 125–136.
89.
Van MolC (2018) Becoming Europeans: The relationship between student exchanges in higher education, European citizenship and a sense of European identity. The European Journal of Social Science Research31(4): 449–463.
90.
VerhaegenSHoogheM (2015) Does more knowledge about the European Union lead to a stronger European identity? A comparative analysis among adolescents in 21 European member states.The European Journal of Social Science Research28(2): 127–146.
91.
VerhaegenSHoogheMQuintelierE (2017) The effect of political trust and trust in European citizens on European identity. European Political Science Review9(2): 161–181.
92.
ZürnMCheckelJ (2005) Getting socialized to build bridges: Constructivism and rationalism, Europe and the nation-state. International Organization59(4): 1045–1079.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
