Does EU funding improve local state capacity? We focus on two specific types of state capacity, namely (a) the ability to provide information to third parties and (b) to discriminate between different kinds of inquiries. Because the EU’s structural funds are distributed through a competitive mechanism and incentivize expansions in administrative personnel, our theory predicts that high levels of EU funding bring about a higher bureaucratic capacity equilibrium. Empirically, we analyze the effect of structural funds on local government capacity in the largest recipient country: post-communist Poland. Through a randomized survey with more than 2400 municipal administrations, we find that administrations that have benefited more from EU funding, have developed higher levels of discrimination capacity. Yet we find no evidence for higher information provision capacity.
BaileyDDe ProprisL (2002)
EU structural funds, regional capabilities and enlargement: Towards multi-level governance?Journal of European Integration24(4): 303–324.
2.
BaileyDDe ProprisL (2004)
A bridge too phare? EU pre-accession aid and capacity-building in the candidate countries. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies42(1): 77–98.
3.
BaldersheimHIllnerMWollmannH (2013) Local Democracy in Post-Communist Europe. Vol. 2.
Berlin:
Springer Science & Business Media.
4.
BearceDHTironeDC (2010)
Foreign aid effectiveness and the strategic goals of donor governments. The Journal of Politics72(3): 837–851.
5.
BeckerSOBoeckhKHainzC, et al. (2016)
The empire is dead, long live the empire! Long-run persistence of trust and corruption in the bureaucracy. The Economic Journal126(590): 40–74.
6.
BeckerSOEggerPHVon EhrlichM (2010)
Going NUTS: The effect of EU structural funds on regional performance. Journal of Public Economics94(9-10): 578–590.
7.
BerlinerD (2014)
The political origins of transparency. The Journal of Politics76(2): 479–491.
8.
BerlinerDBagozziBEPalmer-RubinB (2018)
What information do citizens want? Evidence from one million information requests in Mexico. World Development109: 222–235.
9.
BiaMMatteiA (2008)
A Stata package for the estimation of the dose-response function through adjustment for the generalized propensity score. The Stata Journal: Promoting Communications on Statistics and Stata8(3): 354–373.
10.
BieleckaD (2006)
Regionalne zróżnicowanie sprawności samorz?dów w wykorzystaniu środków z funduszu SAPARD. Studia Regionalne i Lokalne7(23): 83–106.
11.
BlochFESmithSP (1977)
Human capital and labor market employment. The Journal of Human Resources12(4): 550–560.
12.
BodensteinTKemmerlingA (2011)
Ripples in a rising tide: Why some EU regions receive more structural funds than others. European Integration Online Papers16(1): 1–24.
13.
BouvetFDall'ErbaS (2010)
European regional structural funds: How large is the influence of politics on the allocation process?JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies48(3): 501–528.
14.
BräutigamDAKnackS (2004)
Foreign aid, institutions, and governance in sub-Saharan Africa. Economic Development and Cultural Change52(2): 255–285.
15.
ChalmersAW (2013)
Regional authority, transnational lobbying and the allocation of structural funds in the European Union. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies51(5): 815–831.
16.
ChalmersAWDellmuthLM (2015)
Fiscal redistribution and public support for European integration. European Union Politics16(3): 386–407.
17.
CharaszP (2021) From feudalism to populism: Evidence from Poland. Working Paper.
18.
CharronN (2016)
Explaining the allocation of regional structural funds: The conditional effect of governance and self-rule. European Union Politics17(4): 638–659.
19.
ChenJPanJXuY (2016)
Sources of authoritarian responsiveness: A field experiment in China. American Journal of Political Science60(2): 383–400.
20.
ChongALa PortaRLopez-de SilanesF, et al. (2014)
Letter grading government efficiency. Journal of the European Economic Association12(2): 277–299.
21.
da CruzNFTavaresAFMarquesRC, et al. (2016)
Measuring local government transparency. Public Management Review18(6): 866–893.
22.
De RynckSMcAleaveyP (2001)
The cohesion deficit in structural fund policy. Journal of European Public Policy8(4): 541–557.
23.
DebusMMüllerJObertP (2011)
Europeanization and government formation in multi-level systems: Evidence from the Czech Republic. European Union Politics12(3): 381–403.
24.
DellmuthLM (2011)
The cash divide: The allocation of European Union regional grants. Journal of European Public Policy18(7): 1016–1033.
25.
DellmuthLMStoffelMF (2012)
Distributive politics and intergovernmental transfers: The local allocation of European Union structural funds. European Union Politics13(3): 413–433.
26.
DowleyKM (2006)
Local government transparency in East Central Europe. Local Government Studies32(5): 563–583.
27.
EasterlyW (2007)
Was development assistance a mistake?American Economic Review97(2): 328–332.
28.
European Commission (2005) The Instrument for Structural Policy for Pre-Accession (ISPA) in 2003: Annual report. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
29.
European Commission (2014) Multiannual financial framework 2014--2020 and EU budget. Available at: https://op.europa.eu/s/nHA1 (accessed 8 March 2021).
FarberHS (2010) Job loss and the decline in job security in the United States. In: Abraham KG, Spletzer JR and Harper M (eds) Labor in the New Economy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp.223–262.
34.
FloresCAFlores-LagunesAGonzalezA, et al. (2012)
Estimating the effects of length of exposure to instruction in a training program: The case of job corps. Review of Economics and Statistics94(1): 153–171.
35.
GadowskaK (2010)
National and international anti-corruption efforts: The case of Poland. Global Crime11(2): 178–209.
36.
GailmardSPattyJW (2007)
Slackers and zealots: Civil service, policy discretion, and bureaucratic expertise. American Journal of Political Science51(4): 873–889.
37.
GoldsmithAA (2001)
Foreign aid and statehood in Africa. International Organization55(1): 123–148.
38.
HendrixCS (2010)
Measuring state capacity: Theoretical and empirical implications for the study of civil conflict. Journal of Peace Research47(3): 273–285.
39.
HiranoKImbensGW (2004) The propensity score with continuous treatments. In: Gelman A and Meng X-L (eds) Applied Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference from Incomplete-Data Perspectives. New Jersey: Wiley, pp.73–84.
40.
JacksonJEMachBWMiller-GonzalezJL (2011)
Buying support and regime change: The evolution of Polish attitudes towards the EU and voting between accession and 2008. European Union Politics12(2): 147–167.
41.
JonesSTarpF (2016)
Does foreign aid harm political institutions? Journal of Development Economics118: 266–281.
42.
KainRJBaigentE (1992) The Cadastral Map in the Service of the State: A History of Property Mapping. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
43.
KeechWR (2013) Economic Politics in the United States.
Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
44.
KemmerlingABodensteinT (2006)
Partisan politics in regional redistribution: Do parties affect the distribution of EU structural funds across regions?European Union Politics7(3): 373–392.
45.
KimEMKimPHKimJ (2013)
From development to development cooperation: Foreign aid, country ownership, and the developmental state in South Korea. The Pacific Review26(3): 313–336.
46.
KimSLeeJ (2012)
E-participation, transparency, and trust in local government. Public Administration Review72(6): 819–828.
47.
KnackSRahmanA (2007)
Donor fragmentation and bureaucratic quality in aid recipients. Journal of Development Economics83(1): 176–197.
48.
LeeMMZhangN (2017)
Legibility and the informational foundations of state capacity. The Journal of Politics79(1): 118–132.
49.
MilioS (2007)
Can administrative capacity explain differences in regional performances? Evidence from structural funds implementation in Southern Italy. Regional Studies41(4): 429–442.
MohlPHagenT (2010)
Do EU structural funds promote regional growth? New evidence from various panel data approaches. Regional Science and Urban Economics40(5): 353–365.
52.
MontoyaC (2008)
The European Union, capacity building, and transnational networks: Combating violence against women through the Daphne program. International Organization62(2): 359–372.
53.
MossTPettersson GelanderGvan de WalleN (2006) An aid-institutions paradox? A review essay on aid dependency and state building in Sub-Saharan Africa. Center for Global Development Working Papers, No. 74.
PanderW (2009) Mechanizmy skutecznego wykorzystania środków dla polityki spójności na poziomie lokalnym. In: Stawicki M (ed.) Fundusze europejskie w gminach: Rozwój lokalny, wykorzystanie środków UE, rekomendacje dla samorządów. Warszawa: Ministerstwo Rozwoju Regionalnego, pp.120–123.
56.
PappZ (2019)
Votes, money can buy. The conditional effect of EU structural funds on government MPs’ electoral performance. European Union Politics20(4): 543–561.
57.
PiotrowskiSJVan RyzinGG (2007)
Citizen attitudes toward transparency in local government. The American Review of Public Administration37(3): 306–323.
58.
Rose-AckermanS (2005) From Elections to Democracy: Building Accountable Government in Hungary and Poland. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
59.
RosenbaumPRRubinDB (1983)
The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika70(1): 41–55.
60.
SchimmelfennigFSedelmeierU (2005) The Europeanization of Central and Eastern Europe. New York: Cornell University Press.
61.
SchraffD (2014)
Buying turnout or rewarding loyalists? Electoral mobilization and EU structural funding in the German Länder. European Union Politics15(2): 277–288.
62.
ScottJC (1998) Seeing like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed.
London:
Yale University Press.
63.
SelayaPThieleR (2012)
The impact of aid on bureaucratic quality: Does the mode of delivery matter? Journal of International Development24(3): 379–386.
64.
SolDAd (2013)
The institutional, economic and social determinants of local government transparency. Journal of Economic Policy Reform16(1): 90–107.
65.
SpáčPVodaPZagrapanJ (2018)
Does the freedom of information law increase transparency at the local level? Evidence from a field experiment. Government Information Quarterly35(3): 408–417.
66.
StatisticsPoland (2021) Local data bank. Available at: https://stat.gov.pl/en/ (accessed 8 March 2021).
67.
StawickiM (2009) Wykorzystanie funduszy europejskich przez gminy w latach. (2004–2009). In Stawicki M (ed.) Fundusze Europejskie w Gminach: Rozwój Lokalny, Wykorzystanie Środków UE, Rekomendacje Dla Samorządów. Warszawa: Ministerstwo Rozwoju Regionalnego, pp.77–100.
68.
SurubaruN-C (2020)
European funds in Central and Eastern Europe: Drivers of change or mere funding transfers? Evaluating the impact of European aid on national and local development in Bulgaria and Romania. European Politics and Society: 1–19.
69.
SwianiewiczPKrukowskaJLackowskaM (2013) Profesjonalizacja absorpcji funduszy: Beneficjenci samorządowi centralnie zarządzanych programów operacyjnych w okresie 2007–2013. Warszawa: Ministerstwo Rozwoju Regionalnego.
70.
TosunJ (2014)
Absorption of regional funds: A comparative analysis. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies52(2): 371–387.
71.
VoglerJP (2019a) The entanglement of public bureaucratic institutions: Their interactions with society, culture, politics, and the economy. In: BoudreauxDJCoyneCJHerzbergB (eds) Interdisciplinary Studies of the Political Order: New Applications of Public Choice Theory.
Lanham:
Rowman & Littlefield, pp.99–129.
72.
VoglerJP (2019b)
Imperial rule, the imposition of bureaucratic institutions, and their long-term legacies. World Politics71(04): 806–863.
73.
VoglerJP (2020) The political economy of the European Union: An exploration of EU institutions and governance from the perspective of polycentrism. In: Boettke P, Herzberg B and Kogelmann B (eds) Exploring the Political Economy and Social Philosophy of Vincent and Elinor Ostrom. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, pp.145–181.
74.
WeberM (1978) Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
75.
WoodAKLewisDE (2017)
Agency performance challenges and agency politicization. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory27(4): 581–595.
76.
WrightJWintersM (2010)
The politics of effective foreign aid. Annual Review of Political Science13(1): 61–80.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
