Research on issue attention in the European Union has focused on the prominence of EU integration in domestic politics and media and, at EU level, on the salience of individual issues and legislative files, often in relation to lobbying. Existing EU-level measures of issue saliency, though, are limited in scope and periodicity and tend to reflect the policy priorities of a single institutional actor rather than that of the broader EU elite sphere. We present an alternative measure of issue attention leveraging the quasi-institutional nature of the Agence Europe daily bulletin which provides comprehensive but independent news coverage of EU affairs. We use text-mining techniques, including dynamic topic modelling, in combination with manual classification to map issue prevalence between 1979 and 2018. In addition to reporting validation results, we illustrate how our measure relates to other indicators of EU agenda formation and explain how researchers can make use of our new dataset.
AdamBPSEschnerB (2008)
The contribution of the press to Europeanization of public debates. Journalism: Theory, Practice & Criticism9(4): 465–492.
2.
AlexandrovaP (2017)
Institutional issue proclivity in the EU: The European council vs the commission. Journal of European Public Policy24: 755–774.
3.
AlexandrovaPCarammiaMPrincenSet al. (2014)
Measuring the European Council agenda: Introducing a new approach and dataset. European Union Politics15: 152–167.
4.
AlexandrovaPCarammiaMTimmermansA (2012)
Policy punctuations and issue diversity on the European council agenda. Policy Studies Journal40(1): 69–88.
5.
AlexandrovaPRasmussenAToshkovD (2016)
Agenda responsiveness in the European Council: Public priorities, policy problems and political attention. West European Politics39: 605–627.
6.
ArghyrouMKontonikasA (2012)
The EMU sovereign debt crisis: Fundamentals, expectations and contagion. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money22: 658–677.
7.
BäckstrandKElgströmO (2013)
The EU’s role in climate change negotiations: From leader to ‘leadiator’. Journal of European Public Policy20: 1369–1386.
8.
BastinG (2002) L'Europe saisie par l'information (1952–2001): Des professionnels du journalisme engage aux content coordinators [Europe seized by information (1952–2001): journalism professionals as content coordinators]. Cahiers Politiques, pp.19–41. Brussels: L'Harmattan.
9.
BaumgartnerFGreen-PedersenCJonesB (2006)
Comparative studies of policy agendas. Journal of European Public Policy13: 959–974.
10.
BaumgartnerFJonesB (1993) Agendas and Instability in American Politics.
Chicago:
University of Chicago Press.
11.
BeyersJDürAWonkaA (2018)
The political salience of EU policies. Journal of European Public Policy25: 1726–1737.
12.
BleiDM (2012)
Probabilistic topic models. Communications of the ACM55(4): 77–84.
13.
BleiDMLaffertyJD (2006) Dynamic topic models. In: Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on machine learning. New York: ACM, pp.113–120.
14.
BleiDMLaffertyJDet al. (2007)
A correlated topic model of science. The Annals of Applied Statistics1(1): 17–35.
BoydstunAE (2013) Politics, the Media, and Agenda Setting.
Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
17.
BusbyA (2013)
‘bursting the Brussels bubble’: Using ethnography to explore the European parliament as a transnational political field. Perspectives on European Politics and Society14(2): 203–222.
18.
CarammiaMPrincenSTimmermansA (2016)
From summitry to EU government: An agenda formation perspective on the European Council. Journal of Common Market Studies54: 809–825.
19.
CarminesEGStimsonJA (1989) Issue Evolution: Race and the Transformation of American Politics.
Princeton: Princeton University Press.
20.
CatalinacA (2016)
From pork to policy: The rise of programmatic campaigning in Japanese elections. Journal of Politics78:1–18.
21.
ChangJGerrishSWangCet al. (2009) Reading tea leaves: How humans interpret topic models. In: Bengio Y, Schuurmans D, Lafferty JD, Williams CKI and Culotta A (eds) Advances in neural information processing systems. Vancouver, BC, pp.288–296.
22.
De BruyckerIBeyersJ (2015)
Balanced or biased? Interest groups and legislative lobbying in the European news media. Political Communication32: 453–474.
23.
DennyMJSpirlingA (2018)
Text preprocessing for unsupervised learning: Why it matters, when it misleads, and what to do about it. Political Analysis26(2): 168–189.
24.
Diez-MedranoJ (2004) Framing Europe. Attitudes to European Integration in Germany, Spain, and the United Kingdom.
Princeton: Princeton University Press.
25.
DimitrovRS (2010)
Inside Copenhagen: The state of climate governance. Global Environmental Politics10: 18–24.
26.
DürAMateoG (2014)
Public opinion and interest group influence: How citizen groups derailed the anti-counterfeiting trade agreement. Journal of European Public Policy21: 1199–1217.
27.
DybowskiTPAdämmerP (2018)
The economic effects of U.S. presidential tax communication: Evidence from a correlated topic model. European Journal of Political Economy55: 511–525.
28.
FougierE (2010)
Le journalisme Européen, un bien nécessaire.L’Europe en Formation3: 149–173.
29.
GreeneDCrossJP (2017)
Exploring the political agenda of the European parliament using a dynamic topic modelling approach. Political Analysis25: 77–94.
30.
GrimmerJ (2010)
A Bayesian hierarchical topic model for political texts: Measuring expressed agendas in senate press releases. Political Analysis18: 1–35.
31.
GrimmerJStewartBM (2013)
Text as data: The promise and pitfalls of automatic content analysis methods for political texts. Political Analysis21(03): 267–297.
32.
GroenLNiemannA (2013)
The European Union at the Copenhagen climate negotiations: A case of contested EU actorness and effectiveness. International Relations27: 308–324.
33.
HägeFM (2016)
Political attention in the council of the European Union: A new dataset of working party meetings, 1995–2014. European Union Politics17(4): 683–703.
34.
HaugCBerkhoutF (2010)
Learning the hard way? European climate policy after Copenhagen.Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development52: 20–27.
35.
HruschkaDJSchwartzDSt. JohnDCet al. (2004)
Reliability in coding open-ended data: Lessons learned from HIV behavioral research. Field Methods16(3): 307–331.
36.
KimSE (2018)
Media bias against foreign firms as a veiled trade barrier: Evidence from Chinese newspapers. American Political Science Review112: 954–970.
37.
KlüverH (2011)
The contextual nature of lobbying: Explaining lobbying success in the European union. European Union Politics12:483–506.
38.
KoopmansR (2007)
Who inhabits the European public sphere? Winners and losers, supporters and opponents in Europeanised political debates. European Journal of Political Research46: 183–210.
39.
KoopmansRPfetschB (2006)
Obstacles or motors of Europeanization? German media and the transnationalization of public debate. Communications31: 115–138.
40.
LucasCNielsenRARobertsMEet al. (2015)
Computer-assisted text analysis for comparative politics. Political Analysis23(2): 254–277.
41.
ManganelliSWolswijkG (2009)
What drives spreads in the Euro area government bond market?Economic Policy24: 191–240.
42.
MarthozJ-P (2008) Journalisme international. De Boeck Supérieur. Brussels.
43.
MimnoDWallachHMTalleyEet al. (2011) Optimizing semantic coherence in topic models. In: Proceedings of the conference on empirical methods in natural language processing. Stroudsburg: Association for Computational Linguistics, pp.262–272.
44.
NetjesCEBinnemaHA (2007)
The salience of the European integration issue: Three data sources compared. Electoral Studies26(1): 39–49.
45.
OberthürS (2011)
The European Union’s performance in the international climate change regime. Journal of European Integration33: 667–682.
46.
OomsJ (2017) Hunspell: High-performance stemmer, tokenizer, and spell checker for r. R package version 2.3. Available at: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=hunspell (accessed 25 January 2020).
47.
OsnabrüggeM (2015)
The European commission and the implementation of its legislative programme. European Union Politics16(2): 241–261.
48.
PeterJDe VreeseC (2004)
In search of Europe. A cross-national comparative study of the European Union in national television news. The International Journal of Press/Politics9: 3–24.
49.
PetersG (1994)
Agenda-setting in the European community. Journal of European Public Policy1: 9–26.
50.
PrincenS (2007)
Agenda-setting in the European Union: A theoretical exploration and agenda for research. Journal of European Public Policy14: 21–38.
51.
PrincenS (2011)
Agenda-setting strategies in EU policy processes. Journal of European Public Policy18: 927–943.
52.
PrincenSRhinardM (2006)
Crashing and creeping: Agenda-setting dynamics in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy13: 1119–1132.
53.
QuinnKMMonroeBLColaresiMet al. (2010)
How to analyze political attention with minimal assumptions and costs. American Journal of Political Science54: 209–228.
54.
RauhC (2014)
Communicating supranational governance? The salience of EU affairs in the German bundestag, 1991–2013. European Union Politics16(1): 116–138.
55.
RisseT (2010) A Community of Europeans? Transnational Identities and Public Spheres.
New York:
Cornell University Press.
56.
RobertsMEStewartBMTingleyD (2019)
stm: R package for structural topic models. Journal of Statistical Software 91(2): 1–40.
57.
RobertsMEStewartBMTingleyDet al. (2014)
Structural topic models for open-ended survey responses. American Journal of Political Science58: 1064–1082.
58.
Rosen-ZviMGriffithsTSteyversMet al. (2004) The author-topic model for authors and documents. In: Proceedings of the 20th conference on uncertainty in artificial intelligence. Virginia, US: AUAI Press, pp.487–494.
59.
RothschildJEHowatAJShafranekRMet al. (2019) Pigeonholing partisans: Stereotypes of party supporters and partisan polarization. Political Behaviour 41: 423–443.
60.
SmithR (2007) An overview of the tesseract OCR engine. In: Ninth international conference on document analysis and recognition (ICDAR 2007), Volume 2. New York: IEEE, pp.629–633.
61.
SoraceM (2018)
The European union democratic deficit: Substantive representation in the European parliament at the input stage. European Union Politics19: 3–24.
62.
VeenT (2011)
Positions and salience in European Union politics: Estimation and validation of a new dataset. European Union Politics12(2): 267–288.
63.
WallachHMMurrayISalakhutdinovRet al. (2009) Evaluation methods for topic models. In: Proceedings of the 26th annual international conference on machine learning. New York: ACM, pp.1105–1112.
64.
WarntjenA (2012)
Measuring salience in EU legislative politics. European Union Politics13: 168–182.
65.
WlezienC (2005)
On the salience of political issues: The problem with ‘most important problem’. Electoral Studies24: 555–579.
66.
WonkaA (2016)
The party politics of the euro crisis in the German bundestag: Frames, positions and salience. West European Politics39: 125–144.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
