How did the Eurozone bailouts affect national democracies? Recent research indicates strong citizen detachment due to the external constraints imposed by bailout programs on national autonomy. This paper re-examines the detachment thesis by broadening the view toward multiple dimensions of democracy and effect heterogeneity across time and space. Using the generalized synthetic control method, we find a negative effect of bailouts on satisfaction with democracy and turnout but show that effects vanish after several years and vary strongly across bailout cases. In addition, we find resilient attitudes and behaviors in spite of national democratic institutions that continue to deteriorate. These findings indicate that economic policy outcomes have a stronger influence on satisfaction with democracy and electoral turnout than the quality of the democratic process.
AartsKvan HamCThomassenJ (2017) Modernization, globalization, and satisfaction with democracy. In: van HamCThomassenJAartsK, et al. (eds) Myth and Reality of the Legitimacy Crisis: Explaining Trends and Cross-National Differences in Established Democracies.
Oxford:
Oxford University Press, pp. 37–57.
2.
AbadieADiamondAHainmuellerJ (2010)
Synthetic control methods for comparative case studies: Estimating the effect of California’s Tobacco Control Program.Journal of the American Statistical Association105(490): 493–505.
3.
AlonsoSRuiz-RufinoR (2018) The cost of responsibility for the political establishment of the Eurozone (1999–2015). Party Politics. Epub ahead of print on 11 April 2018. DOI: 10.1177/1354068818766182.
4.
AndersonCGuilloryC (1997)
Political institutions and satisfaction with democracy: A cross-national analysis of consensus and majoritarian systems.American Political Science Review91(1): 66–81.
5.
ArmingeonKCekaB (2014)
The loss of trust in the European Union during the great recession since 2007: The role of heuristics from the national political system.European Union Politics15(1): 82–107.
6.
ArmingeonKGuthmannK (2014)
Democracy in crisis? The declining support for national democracy in European countries, 2007–2011.European Journal of Political Research53(3): 423–442.
7.
ArmingeonKGuthmannKWeisstannerD (2016)
How the Euro divides the union: The effect of economic adjustment on support for democracy in Europe.Socio-Economic Review14(1): 1–26.
8.
BaiJ (2009)
Panel data models with interactive fixed effects. Econometrica77(4): 1229–1279.
9.
BoscoAVerneyS (2012)
Electoral epidemic: The political cost of economic crisis in Southern Europe, 2010–11. South European Society and Politics17(2): 129–154.
10.
BrackNStartinN (2015)
Introduction: Euroscepticism, from the margins to the mainstream.International Political Science Review36(3): 239–249.
11.
CanacheDMondakJSeligsonM (2001)
Meaning and measurement in cross-national measurement of satisfaction with democracy.Public Opinion Quarterly65: 506–528.
12.
ClarkeHDuttNKornbergA (1993)
The political economy of attitudes towards polity and society in Western European democracies. Journal of Politics55(4): 998–1021.
13.
CopelovitchMFriedenJWalterS (2016)
The political economy of the Euro crisis.Comparative Political Studies49(7): 811–840.
14.
Coppedge M, Gerring J, Lindberg S, et al. (2017) ‘V-Dem Codebook v7.1’, Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project. V-Dem Institute. University of Gothenburg, Sweden.
15.
Cordero M and Simon P (2016) Economic crisis and support for democracy in Europe. West European Politics 39(2): 305–325.
16.
DasonnevilleRLewis-BeckM (2014)
Macroeconomics, economic crisis and electoral outcomes: A national European pool.Acta Politica49(4): 372–394.
17.
DebomyD (2013) EU No, Euro Yes? European Public Opinions Facing the Crisis (2007–2012).
Paris:
Notre Europe.
18.
DuchRStevensonRT (2008) The Economic Vote: How Political and Economic Institutions Condition Election Results.
Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
19.
EzrowLXezonakisG (2016)
Satisfaction with democracy and voter turnout: A temporal perspective. Party Politics22(1): 3–14.
20.
FossatiD (2014)
Economic vulnerability and economic voting in 14 OECD countries.European Journal of Political Research53(1): 116–135.
21.
FosterCFriedenJ (2017)
Crisis of trust: Socio-economic determinants of Europeans’ confidence in government.European Union Politics18(4): 511–535.
22.
FriedenJWalterS (2017)
Understanding the political economy of the Eurozone crisis.Annual Review of Political Science20: 371–390.
23.
FriedrichsenJZahnP (2014)
Political support in hard times: Do people care about national welfare?European Journal of Political Economy35(1): 23–37.
24.
GenoveseFSchneiderGWassmannP (2016)
The Eurotower strikes back: Crises, adjustments and Europe’s austerity protests.Comparative Political Studies49(7): 939–967.
25.
HellwigTSamuelsD (2007)
Voting in open economies. The electoral consequences of globalization.Comparative Political Studies40(3): 283–306.
26.
HernándezEKriesiH (2016)
The electoral consequences of the financial and economic crisis in Europe.European Journal of Political Research55: 203–224.
27.
KosmidisS (2018)
International constraints and electoral decisions: Does the room to maneuver attenuate economic voting?American Journal of Political Science62(3): 519–534.
28.
LehnerTWasserfallenF (2019)
Political conflict in the reform of the Eurozone.European Union Politics20(1): 45–64.
29.
Lewis-BeckMStegmaierM (2007) Economic models of voting. In: DaltonRJKlingemannH-D (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Political Behaviour.
Oxford:
Oxford University Press, pp.518–537.
30.
LijphartA (1999) Patterns of Democracy. Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries.
New Haven, CT:
Yale University Press.
31.
LindeJEkmanJ (2003)
Satisfaction with democracy: A note on a frequently used indicator in comparative politics.European Journal of Political Research42: 391–408.
32.
LiuLXuY (2018) panelView: Visualizing panel data with dichotomous treatments. R package version 1.0.5. Available at: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=panelView (accessed 2 April 2019).
33.
LutzGMarshM (2007)
Introduction: Consequences of low turnout.Electoral Studies26(2): 392–400.
34.
MagalhãesP (2016)
Economic evaluations, procedural fairness, and satisfaction with democracy.Political Research Quarterly69(3): 522–534.
35.
MajoneG (2014)
From regulatory state to a democratic default.Journal of Common Market Studies52(6): 1216–1223.
36.
MatthijsM (2017)
Integration at what price? The erosion of national democracy in the euro periphery.Government and Opposition52(2): 266–294.
37.
Mellon J, Evans G, Fieldhause EA, et al. (2018) Aggregate turnout is mismeasured. Available at: http://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3098436 (accessed 3 May 2019).
QuarantaMMartiniS (2016)
Does the economy really matter for satisfaction with democracy? Longitudinal and cross-country evidence from the European Union.Electoral Studies42: 164–174.
41.
RittbergerBWinzenT (2015)
Parlamentarismus nach der Krise: Die Vertiefung parlamentarischer Asymmetrie in der reformierten Wirtschafts- und Währungsunion.Politische Vierteljahresschrift56(3): 430–456.
42.
Ruiz-RufinoRAlonsoS (2017)
Democracy without choice: Citizens’ perceptions of government autonomy during the Eurozone crisis.European Journal of Political Research56(2): 320–345.
43.
SchäferA (2013) Affluence, inequality, and satisfaction with democracy. In: GabrielOKeilS (eds) Society and Democracy in Europe.
Abingdon:
Routledge, pp.139–161.
44.
ScharpfF (2011) Monetary Union, Fiscal Crisis and the Preemption of Democracy. MPIfG Discussion Paper No. 11/11.
Cologne:
Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung.
45.
SchimmelfennigF (2015)
Liberal intergovernmentalism and the Euro area crisis. Journal of European Public Policy22(2): 177–195.
46.
SchmidtV (2015) The forgotten problem of democratic legitimacy. “governing by the rules” and “ruling by the numbers”. In: MatthijsMBlythM (eds) The Future of the Euro.
Oxford:
Oxford University Press, pp.90–115.
47.
WagnerASchneiderFHallaM (2009)
The quality of institutions and satisfaction with democracy in Western Europe – A panel analysis. European Journal of Political Economy25: 30–41.
48.
XuY (2017)
Generalized synthetic control method: Causal inference with interactive fixed effects models. Political Analysis25: 57–76.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
