How do emotions affect public opinion on the European Union? This article advances existing literature that focuses on cue-taking, utilitarianism and identity by arguing that emotional reactions are important to understanding citizen attitudes towards the European Union. This is because discrete emotions such as fear, anger and enthusiasm affect how individuals deal with threats and how they seek out, process and use information. We hypothesise that, compared to anxious citizens, those angry with the European Union are more likely to wish to leave the European Union, less receptive to cost–benefit considerations, and less nuanced in their opinions about integration. Our analyses, carried out using a survey conducted in the UK in April 2015, support our hypotheses. These results help us predict the effectiveness of political strategies, e.g. in referendum campaigns.
AndersonCJ (1998) When in doubt, use proxies: Attitudes toward domestic politics and support for European integration. Comparative Political Studies31(5): 569–601.
2.
AndersonCJReichertMS (1995) Economic benefits and support for membership in the E.U.: A cross-national analysis. Journal of Public Policy15(03): 231–249.
3.
ArmingeonKCekaB (2014) The loss of trust in the European Union during the great recession since 2007: The role of heuristics from the national political system. European Union Politics15(1): 82–107.
4.
BraderT (2006) Campaigning for Hearts and Minds: How Emotional Appeals in Political Ads Work, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
5.
BraderTMarcusG (2013) Emotion and political psychology. In: HuddyLSearsDOLevyJS (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology, Oxford: OUP, pp. 165–204.
6.
BraderTValentinoNSuhayE (2008) What triggers public opposition to immigration? Anxiety, group cues, and immigration threat. American Journal of Political Science52(4): 959–978.
7.
CacioppoJTGardnerWLBerntsonGG (1999) The affect system has parallel and integrative processing components: Form follows function. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology76(5): 839–855.
8.
CareyS (2002) Undivided loyalties: Is national identity an obstacle to European integration?European Union Politics3(4): 387–413.
9.
CarverCSHarmon-JonesE (2009) Anger is an approach-related affect: Evidence and implications. Psychological Bulletin135(2): 183–204.
10.
ConoverPJFeldmanS (1986) Emotional reactions to the economy: I’m mad as hell and I’m not going to take it anymore. American Journal of Political Science30(1): 50–78.
11.
De WildePLaupoldASchmidtkeH (2016) Introduction: The differentiated politicisation of European governance. West European Politics39(1): 3–22.
12.
DruckmanJNMcDermottR (2008) Emotion and the framing of risky choice. Political Behavior30(3): 297–321.
13.
ErişenC (2013) Emotions as a determinant in Turkish political behavior. Turkish Studies14(1): 115–135.
14.
Erişen C and Kentmen-Cin C (2015) Utilitarian considerations versus emotions as the foundations of the EU public opinion. Paper presented at the Midwest Political Science Association Annual Meeting, 16 April.
15.
ErişenCKentmen-CinC (2017) Tolerance and perceived threat toward Muslim immigrants in Germany and the Netherlands. European Union Politics18(1): 73–97..
16.
GabelM (1998) Interests and Integration: Market Liberalization, Public Opinion, and European Union, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
17.
GabelMWhittenGD (1997) Economic conditions, economic perceptions and public support for European integration. Political Behavior19(1): 81–96.
18.
GarryJ (2014) Emotions and voting in EU referendums. European Union Politics15(2): 235–254.
19.
GomezR (2015) The economy strikes back: Support for the EU during the great recession. Journal of Common Market Studies53(3): 577–592.
20.
HalperinEPilskinR (2015) Emotions and emotion regulation in intractable conflict: Studying emotional processes within a unique context. Advances in Political Psychology36(1): 119–150.
21.
HoboltSB (2016) The Brexit vote: A divided nation, a divided continent. Journal of European Public Policy23(9): 1259–1277.
22.
HoboltSBDe VriesC (2016) Public support for European integration. Annual Review of Political Science19: 413–432.
23.
HoogheLMarksG (2009) A postfunctionalist theory of European integration: From permissive consensus to constraining dissensus. British Journal of Political Science39(1): 1–23.
24.
HuddyLFeldmanSCasseseE (2007) On the distinct political effects of anxiety and anger. In: NeumanRMarcusGEMacKuenMet al. (eds) The Affect Effect: Dynamics of Emotion in Political Thinking and Behavior, Chicago: Chicago University Press, pp. 202–230.
25.
HuddyLFeldmanSTaberCet al. (2005) Threat, anxiety, and support of antiterrorism policies. American Journal of Political Science49(3): 593–608.
26.
HutchersonCAGrossJJ (2011) The moral emotions: A social–functionalist account of anger, disgust, and contempt. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology100(4): 719–737.
27.
InglehartR (1970) Cognitive mobilization and European identity. Comparative Politics3(1): 45–70.
28.
IsbellLMOttatiVCBurnsKC (2006) Affect and politics: Effects on judgment, processing, and information seeking. In: RedlawskDP (ed.) Feeling Politics, New York: Palgrave, pp. 57–86.
29.
Kentmen-CinCErişenC (2017) Anti-immigration attitudes and the opposition to European integration: A critical assessment. European Union Politics18(1): 3–25.
30.
LaddJMLenzGS (2008) Reassessing the role of anxiety in vote choice. Political Psychology29(2): 275–296.
31.
LarsenJTMcGrawAP (2011) Further evidence for mixed emotions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology100(6): 1095–1110.
32.
LernerJSGonzalezRMSmallDAet al. (2003) Effects of fear and anger on perceived risks of terrorism a national field experiment. Psychological Science14(2): 144–150.
33.
LernerJSKeltnerD (2000) Beyond valence: Toward a model of emotion-specific influences on judgement and choice. Cognition and Emotion14(4): 473–493.
34.
LernerJSKeltnerD (2001) Fear, anger, and risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology81(1): 146–159.
35.
MacKuenMMarcusGENeumanWRet al. (2007) The third way: The theory of affective intelligence and American democracy. In: NeumanWRMarcusGECriglerANet al. (eds) The Affect Effect: Dynamics of Emotion in Political Thinking and Behavior, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 124–151.
36.
MacKuenMWolakJKeeleLet al. (2010) Civic engagements: Resolute partisanship or reflective deliberation. American Journal of Political Science54(2): 440–458.
37.
McLarenLM (2002) Public support for the European Union: Cost/benefit analysis or perceived cultural threat?Journal of Politics64(2): 551–566.
38.
MarcusGE (2003) The psychology of emotion and politics. In: HuddyLSearsDJervisR (eds) Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 182–221.
39.
MarcusGMacKuenM (1993) Anxiety, enthusiasm, and the vote: The emotional underpinnings of learning and involvement during presidential campaigns. American Political Science Review87(3): 672–685.
40.
MarcusGENeumanWRMacKuenM (2000) Affective Intelligence and Political Judgment, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
41.
MerollaJLZechmeisterEJ (2009) Terrorist threat, leadership, and the vote: Evidence from three experiments. Political Behavior31(4): 575–601.
42.
PetersenMB (2010) Distinct emotions, distinct domains: Anger, anxiety and perceptions of intentionality. The Journal of Politics72(02): 357–365.
SandersDClarkeHDStewartMet al. (2007) Does mode matter for modeling political choice? Evidence from the 2005 British Election Study. Political Analysis15(3): 257–285.
45.
SmithHJCroninTKesslerT (2008) Anger, fear, or sadness: Faculty members’ emotional reactions to collective pay disadvantage. Political Psychology29(2): 221–246.
46.
SmithCAEllsworthPC (1985) Patterns of cognitive appraisal in emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology48(4): 813–838.
47.
SteenbergenMEdwardsEDe VriesC (2007) Who’s cueing whom? Mass–elite linkages and the future of European integration. European Union Politics8(1): 13–35.
48.
TellegenAWatsonDClarkLA (1999) On the dimensional and hierarchical structure of affect. Psychological Science10(4): 297–303.
49.
ValentinoNABraderTGroenendykEWet al. (2011) Election night’s alright for fighting: The role of emotions in political participation. Journal of Politics73(1): 156–170.
50.
ValentinoNAGregorowiczKGroenendykEW (2009) Efficacy, emotions and the habit of participation. Political Behavior31(3): 307–330.
51.
ValentinoNAHutchingsVBanksAet al. (2008) Is a worried citizen a good citizen? Emotions, political information seeking and learning via the internet. Political Psychology29(2): 247–279.
52.
WagnerM (2014) Fear and anger in Great Britain: Blame assignment and emotional reactions to the financial crisis. Political Behavior36(3): 683–703.
53.
WeberC (2012) Emotions, campaigns and political participation. Political Research Quarterly66(2): 414–428.
54.
WhiteleyPClarkeHDSandersDet al. (2010) Government performance and life satisfaction in contemporary Britain. Journal of Politics72(3): 733–746.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
