Right-wing populist parties in European democracies appeal to citizens’ feelings of uncertainty related to globalization by promoting tough immigration laws and curbing the power of the European Union. This article adds to our understanding of how individuals’ risk propensity relates to support for right-wing populist parties and their ideas in the context of globalization. In particular, by drawing on survey data from the United Kingdom we investigate how this personality trait relates to support for the United Kingdom Independence Party and the vote for a British exit from the European Union. The article explores the complex interplay between risk propensity and right-wing populist appeals by dissecting the direct, indirect and total effects of this trait.
AlbertazziDMcDonnellD (2008) Introduction: The sceptre and the spectre. In: AlbertazziDMcDonnellD (eds) Twenty-First Century Populism: The Spectre of Western European Democracy, Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave MacMillan, pp. 1–11.
2.
BakkerBNRooduijnMSchumacherG (2016) The psychological roots of populist voting: Evidence from the United States, the Netherlands and Germany. European Journal of Political Research55(2): 302–320.
3.
BechtelMMHainmuellerJMargalitY (2014) Preferences for international redistribution: The divide over the Eurozone bailouts. American Journal of Political Science58(4): 835–856.
4.
BillietJDe WitteH (1995) Attitudinal dispositions to vote for a ‘new’ extreme right-wing party: The case of ‘Vlaams Blok’. European Journal of Political Research27(2): 181–202.
5.
CarducciBJWongAS (1998) Type A and risk taking in everyday money matters. Journal of Business and Psychology12(3): 355–359.
6.
CesariniDDawesCTJohannessonM (2009) Genetic variation in preferences for giving and risk taking. The Quarterly Journal of Economics124(2): 809–842.
7.
CornelisIVan HielA (2015) Extreme-right voting in Western Europe: The role of social–cultural and antiegalitarian attitudes. Political Psychology36(6): 749–760.
8.
DahlbäckO (1990) Personality and risk-taking. Personality and Individual Differences11(12): 1235–1242.
9.
DownI (2007) Trade openness, country size, and economic volatility: The compensation hypothesis revisited. Business and Politics9(2): 1–20.
10.
DreherA (2006) Does globalization affect growth? Evidence from a new index of globalization. Applied Economics38(10): 1091–1110.
11.
DunnK (2015) Preference for radical right-wing populist parties among exclusive-nationalists and authoritarians. Party Politics21(3): 367–380.
12.
EcklesDKamCMaestasC (2014) Risk attitudes and the incumbency advantage. Political Behavior36(4): 731–749.
13.
EhrlichSMaestasC (2010) Risk orientation, risk exposure, and policy opinions: The case of free trade. Political Psychology31(5): 657–684.
14.
Fieldhouse E, Green J, Evans G, et al. (2016) British Election Study Internet Panel Wave 8. Data file.
15.
FilbeckGHatfieldPHorvathP (2005) Risk aversion and personality type. Journal of Behavioral Finance6(4): 170–180.
16.
FordRGoodwinMJCuttsD (2012) Strategic Eurosceptics and polite xenophobes: Support for the United Kingdom Independence Party (UKIP) in the 2009 European Parliament elections. European Journal of Political Research51(2): 204–234.
17.
FordRAGoodwinMJ (2014) Revolt on the Right: Explaining Support for the Radical Right in Britain, New York: Routledge.
18.
GerberASHuberGADohertyD (2010) Personality and political attitudes: Relationships across issue domains and political contexts. The American Political Science Review104(1): 111–133.
19.
GoodwinMHeathO (2016) The 2016 referendum, Brexit, and the left behind: An aggregate-level analysis of the result. The Political Quarterly87(1): 323–332.
20.
GoslingSDRentfrowPJSwannWBJr (2003) A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality37(6): 504–528.
21.
HermansHJMDimaggioG (2007) Self, identity, and globalization in times of uncertainty: A dialogical analysis. Review of General Psychology11(1): 31–61.
JugertPDuckittJ (2009) A motivational model of authoritarianism: Integrating personal and situational determinants. Political Psychology30(5): 693–719.
24.
KahnemanDTverskyA (1979) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica47(2): 263–291.
25.
KamCD (2012) Risk attitudes and political participation. American Journal of Political Science56(4): 817–836.
26.
KamCDSimasEN (2010) Risk orientations and policy frames. Journal of Politics72(2): 381–396.
27.
KinnvallC (2004) Globalization and religious nationalism: Self, identity, and the search for ontological security. Political Psychology25(5): 741–767.
28.
KowertPAHermannMG (1997) Who takes risks? Daring and caution in foreign policy making. The Journal of Conflict Resolution41(5): 611–637.
29.
KriesiHGrandeELachatR (2006) Globalization and the transformation of the national political space: Six European countries compared. European Journal of Political Research45(6): 921–956.
30.
KriesiHGrandeELachatR (2008) West European Politics in the Age of Globalization, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
31.
LoewensteinG (1994) The psychology of curiosity: A review and reinterpretation. Psychological Bulletin116(1): 75–98.
32.
MeertensRMLionR (2008) Measuring an individual’s tendency to take risks: The risk propensity scale. Journal of Applied Social Psychology38(6): 1506–1520.
33.
MondakJJ (2010) Personality and the Foundations of Political Behavior. Cambridge Studies in Public Opinion and Political Psychology, New York: Cambridge University Press.
34.
MorgensternSZechmeisterE (2001) Better the devil you know than the saint you don’t? Risk propensity and vote choice in Mexico. Journal of Politics63(1): 93.
35.
MuddeC (2013) Three decades of populist radical right parties in Western Europe: So what?European Journal of Political Research52(1): 1–19.
36.
MuddeCRovira KaltwasserC (2013) Populism and (liberal) democracy: A framework for analysis. In: MuddeCRovira KaltwasserC (eds) Populism in Europe and the Americas: Threat or Corrective for Democracy?, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–26.
37.
MughanABeanCMcAllisterI (2003) Economic globalization, job insecurity and the populist reaction. Electoral Studies22(4): 617–633.
38.
NadeauRMartinPBlaisA (1999) Attitude towards risk-taking and individual choice in the Quebec referendum on sovereignty. British Journal of Political Science29(3): 523–539.
39.
NicholsonNSoaneEFenton-O’CreevyM (2005) Personality and domain-specific risk taking. Journal of Risk Research8(2): 157–176.
40.
OesterreichD (2005) Flight into security: A new approach and measure of the authoritarian personality. Political Psychology26(2): 275–298.
41.
ScheveKSlaughterM (2004) Economic insecurity and the globalization of production. American Journal of Political Science48(4): 662–674.
SwankDBetzHG (2003) Globalization, the welfare state and right-wing populism in Western Europe. Socio-Economic Review1(2): 215–245.
44.
The Economist (2016, April 18) A Treasury Analysis Suggests the Costs of Brexit Would Be High, The Economist.
45.
Van Der BrugWFennemaMTillieJ (2000) Anti-immigrant parties in Europe: Ideological or protest vote?European Journal of Political Research37(1): 77–102.
46.
VlekCStallenPJ (1980) Rational and personal aspects of risk. Acta Psychologica45(1–3): 273–300.
47.
WalterS (2010) Globalization and the welfare state: Testing the microfoundations of the compensation hypothesis. International Studies Quarterly54(2): 403–426.
48.
WeinsteinEMartinJ (1969) Generality of willingness to take risks. Psychological Reports24(2): 499–501.
49.
ZasloveA (2008) Exclusion, community, and a populist political economy: The radical right as an anti-globalization movement. Comparative European Politics6(2): 169–189.
50.
ZuckermanM (1979) Sensation Seeking Beyond the Optimal Level of Arousal, London: Psychology Press.
51.
ZuckermanMKuhlmanDM (2000) Personality and risk-taking: Common biosocial factors. Journal of Personality68(6): 999–1029.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
