This article studies how different types of tolerance and perceived threat affect opinions about the EU immigration policy in Germany and the Netherlands. We assess to what extent social and political tolerance for and sociotropic and personal threats from Muslim immigrants influence EU citizens’ beliefs that immigration is one of the most important issues facing the EU. By experimentally manipulating religion of immigrant, level of perceived threat, and type of tolerance, we examine how people’s attitudes on immigration policies change. Our findings shed light on how EU countries might deal with the rising tide of intolerance toward immigrants and Muslims, and how better policies of integration could be implemented in a multicultural Europe.
BarnumDGSullivanJL (1989) Attitudinal tolerance and political freedom in Britain. British Journal of Political Science19(1): 136–146.
2.
BraderTValentinoNASuhayE (2008) What triggers public opposition to immigration? Anxiety, group cues, and immigration threat. American Journal of Political Science52(4): 959–978.
3.
DahlRA (1998) On Democracy, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
4.
De VreeseCHBoomgaardenHG (2005) Projecting EU referendums: Fear of immigration and support for European integration. European Union Politics6(1): 59–82.
5.
ErisenC (2016) Tolerance and democratization in Turkey. In: ErisenCKubicekP (eds) Democratic Consolidation in Turkey: Micro and macro challenges, Routledge, Europe: Oxon, pp. 38–64.
6.
ErsanilliEKoopmansR (2010) Rewarding integration? Citizenship regulations and the socio-cultural integration of immigrants in the Netherlands, France and Germany. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies36(5): 773–791.
GibsonJL (1998) A sober second thought: An experiment in persuading Russians to tolerate. American Journal of Political Science42(3): 819–850.
9.
GibsonJL (2006) Enigmas of intolerance: Fifty years after Stouffer’s communism, conformity, and civil liberties. Perspectives on Politics4(1): 21–34.
10.
GivensTLuedtkeA (2004) The politics of European Union immigration policy: Institutions, salience, and harmonization. Policy Studies Journal32(1): 145–165.
11.
GordonSLMaharajB (2015) Neighbourhood-level social capital and anti-immigrant prejudice in an African context: An individual-level analysis of attitudes towards immigrants in South Africa. Commonwealth and Comparative Politics53(2): 197–219.
12.
GuiraudonV (2003) The constitution of a European immigration policy domain: A political sociology approach. Journal of European Public Policy10(2): 263–282.
13.
HoboltSBVan der BrugWDe VreeseCH (2011) Religious intolerance and Euroscepticism. European Union Politics12(3): 359–379.
14.
HuddyLFeldmanSTaberC (2005) Threat, anxiety, and support of anti-terrorism policies. American Journal of Political Science49(3): 593–608.
15.
HuddyLFeldmanSWeberC (2007) The political consequences of perceived threat and felt insecurity. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science614: 131–153.
16.
KalkanKOLaymanGCUslanerEM (2009) “Band of Others”? Attitudes toward Muslims in Contemporary American Society. The Journal of Politics71(3): 1–16.
17.
KirchnerAFreitagMRappC (2011) Crafting tolerance: The role of political institutions in a comparative perspective. European Political Science Review3(02): 201–227.
18.
LijphartA (1999) Patterns of Democracy, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
19.
LubbersM (2008) Regarding the Dutch ‘nee’ to the European constitution: A test of the identity, utilitarian and political approaches to voting ‘no’. European Union Politics9(1): 59–86.
20.
LubbersMScheepersP (2007) Explanations of political euro-skepticism at the individual, regional and national levels. European Societies9(4): 643–669.
21.
LuedtkeA (2005) European integration, public opinion and immigration policy: Testing the impact of national identity. European Union Politics6(1): 83–112.
22.
MacKuenMWolakJKeeleL (2010) Civic engagements: Resolute partisanship or reflective deliberation. American Journal of Political Science54(2): 440–458.
23.
McLarenLM (2003) Anti-immigrant prejudice in Europe: Contact, threat perception, and preferences for the exclusion of migrants. Social Forces81(3): 909–936.
24.
Marcus GE, Sullivan JL, Theiss-Morse E, et al. (1995) With Malice Toward Some: How People Make Civil Liberties Judgments. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
25.
Marquart-PyattSPaxtonP (2007) In principle and in practice: Learning political tolerance in Eastern and Western Europe. Political Behavior29(1): 89–113.
26.
NollJVDPoppeEVerkuytenM (2010) Political tolerance and prejudice: Differential reactions toward Muslims in the Netherlands. Basic and Applied Social Psychology32(1): 46–56.
27.
PeffleyMRohrschneiderR (2003) Democratization and political tolerance in seventeen countries: A multi-level model of democratic learning. Political Research Quarterly56(3): 243–257.
28.
PetersenMSlothuusRStubagerR (2011) Freedom for all? The strength and limits of political tolerance. British Journal of Political Science41(03): 581–597.
29.
ServentARTraunerF (2014) Do supranational EU institutions make a difference? EU asylum law before and after ‘communitarization’. Journal of European Public Policy21(8): 1142–1162.
30.
ShamirMSagiv-SchifterT (2006) Conflict, identity, and tolerance: Israel in the Al-Aqsa intifada. Political Psychology27(4): 569–595.
31.
SkitkaLJBaumanCWMullenE (2004) Political tolerance and coming to psychological closure following the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks: An integrative approach. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin30(6): 743–756.
32.
SnidermanPMHaagendoornL (2007) When Ways of Life Collide: Multiculturalism and Its Discontent in the Netherlands, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
33.
SnidermanPMHagendoornLPriorM (2004) Predisposing factors and situational triggers: Exclusionary reactions to immigrants minorities. American Political Science Review98(1): 35–49.
34.
SpieckerBSteutelJ (2001) Multiculturalism, pillarization and liberal civic education in the Netherlands. International Journal of Educational Research35(3): 293–304.
35.
StathamPKoopmansRGiugniM (2005) Resilient or adaptable Islam? Multiculturalism, religion and migrants’ claims-making for group demands in Britain, the Netherlands and France. Ethnicities5(4): 427–459.
36.
StevensDVaughan-WilliamsN (2016) Citizens and security threats: Issues, perceptions and consequences beyond the national frame. British Journal of Political Science46(1): 149–175.
37.
SullivanJLPiersonJMarcusGE (1982) Political Tolerance and American Democracy, Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
38.
SullivanJLShamirMWalshP (1985) Political Tolerance in Context: Support for Unpopular Minorities in Israel, New Zealand, and the United States, Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
39.
Van KlingerenMBoomgaardenHGDe VreeseCH (2013) Going soft or staying soft: Have identity factors become more important than economic rationale when explaining Euroscepticism?Journal of European Integration35(6): 689–704.
40.
VerkuytenMSlooterL (2007) Tolerance of Muslim beliefs and practices: Age related differences and context effects. International Journal of Behavioral Development31(5): 467–477.
41.
WeldonSA (2006) The institutional context of tolerance for ethnic minorities: A comparative, multilevel analysis of Western Europe. American Journal of Political Science50(2): 331–349.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
