We ask how pro-European parties communicate in the face of a Eurosceptic challenge and how this affects the politicization of European Union integration within a country. We draw on a quantitative content analysis of parties’ press releases issued in the run-up to the 2014 European Parliament elections in seven countries. Our results show that pro-European parties as such put Europe on the agenda, debate issues similar to those voiced by Eurosceptics and defend their pro-European positions: yet, they do so to varying degrees and with major exceptions. It is pro-European catch-all parties with strong internal dissent that silence Europe and choose blurring or adoption strategies. Consequently, the politicization of European integration varies among countries, thereby high topic visibility is accompanied by low levels of party conflict.
AdamS (2007) Domestic adaptations of Europe: A comparative study of the debates on EU enlargement and a common constitution in the German and French quality press. International Journal of Public Opinion Research19(4): 409–433.
2.
AdamSMaierM (2016) Campaigning on or downplaying EU integration? Explaining the salience parties attach to EU matters in European Parliamentary election campaigns. In: de VreeseCde BrugW (eds) (Un-)Intended Consequences of European Parliamentary Elections, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 148–170.
3.
AdamSMaierMDe VreeseC (2013) Campaigning against Europe? The role of Euroskeptic fringe and mainstream parties in the 2009 European Parliament election. Journal of Political Marketing12(1): 77–99.
4.
Bakker R, Edwards E, Hooghe L, et al. (2015) 2014 Chapel Hill expert survey. Version 2015.1. In N. U. o. N. C. Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill. (ed). Available at: http://chesdata.eu/ (accessed 10 September 2015).
5.
BaleTGreen-PedersenCKrouwelA (2010) If you can't beat them, join them? Explaining social democratic responses to the challenge from the populist radical right in Western Europe. Political Studies58(3): 410–426.
6.
BorgattiSPEverettMGJohnsonJC (2013) Analyzing Social Networks, London: SAGE.
7.
BudgeIFarlieDJ (1983) Explaining and Predicting Elections: Issue Effects and Party Strategies in Twenty-Three Democracies, London/Boston/Syndney: George Allen & Unwin.
8.
CarminesEGStimsonJA (1993) On the evolution of political issues. In: RikerWH (ed.) Agenda Formation, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, pp. 151–168.
9.
De SioLWeberT (2014) Issue yield: A model of party strategy in multidimensional space. American Political Science Review108(4): 870–885.
10.
De WildeP (2011) No polity for old politics? A framework for analyzing the politicization of European integration. Journal of European Integration33(5): 559–575.
11.
DownsA (1957) An Economic Theory of Democracy, New York: Harper.
12.
DuncanODDuncanB (1955) A methodological analysis of segregation indexes. American Sociological Review20(2): 210–217.
13.
FerraraFWeishauptJ (2004) Get your act together: Party performance in European Parliament elections. European Union Politics5(3): 283–306.
14.
GabelMScheveK (2007) Mixed messages. Party dissent and mass opinion on European integration. European Union Politics8(1): 37–59.
15.
Green-PedersenC (2007) The growing importance of issue competition: The changing nature of party competition in Western Europe. Political Studies55(3): 607–628.
16.
Green-PedersenC (2011) A giant fast asleep? Party incentives and politicization of European integration. Political Studies60(1): 115–130.
17.
Green-PedersenCMortensenPB (2010) Who sets the agenda and who responds to it in the Danish parliament? A new model of issue competition and agenda-setting. European Journal of Political Research49(2): 257–281.
18.
HoboltSSpoonJJ (2012) Motivating the European voter: Parties, issues and campaigns in European Parliament elections. European Journal of Political Research51(6): 701–727.
19.
HoogheLMarksG (2008) A postfunctionalist theory of European integration: From permissive consensus to constraining dissensus. British Journal of Political Science39(1): 1–23.
20.
HurrelmannAGoraAWagnerA (2013) The politicization of European integration: More than an elite affair?Political Studies63(1): 1–17.
21.
HutterSGrandeE (2014) Politicizing Europe in the national electoral arena: A comparative analysis of five West European countries, 1970–2010. Journal of Common Market Studies52(5): 1002–1018.
22.
Koopmans R and Statham P (eds.). (2010) The Making of a European Public Sphere. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23.
KriesiH (2008) Rejoinder to Liesbet Hooghe and Gary Marks, ‘A postfunctional theory of European integration: From permissive consensus to constraining dissensus’. British Journal of Political Science39(1): 221–224.
24.
KriesiHGrandeELachatR (2008) West European Politics in the Age of Globalization, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25.
Maier M, Adam S, de Vreese C, et al. (2014) Politicization of EU integration. Codebook for a content analysis of media and party communication. Available at: www.ikmb.unibe.ch/codebuch_eu2014. (accessed 13 July 2016).
26.
MeguidBM (2005) Competition between unequals: The role of mainstream party strategy and nich party success. American Political Science Review99(3): 347–360.
27.
ParsonsCWeberT (2011) Cross-cutting issues and party strategy in the European Union. Comparative Political Studies44(4): 383–411.
28.
PedersenM (1979) The dynamics of European party systems: Changing patterns of electoral volatility. European Journal of Political Research7(1): 1–26.
29.
PetrocikJR (1996) Issue ownership in presidential elections, with a 1980 case study. American Journal of Political Science40(3): 825–850.
30.
RovnyJ (2012) Who emphasizes and who blurs? Party strategies in multidimensional competition. European Union Politics13(2): 269–292.
31.
SchuckAExzonakisGElenbaasM (2011) Party contestation and Europe on the news agenda: The 2009 European Parliamentary elections. Electoral Studies30: 41–52.
32.
SigelmanLBuellEH (2004) Avoidance or engagement? Issue convergence in U.S. presidential campaigns, 1960–2000. American Journal of Political Science48(4): 650–661.
33.
SteenbergenMRScottDJ (2004) Contesting Europe? The salience of European integration as a party issue. In: MarksGSteenbergenMR (eds) European Integration and Political Conflict, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 165–192.
34.
Stetka V, Lilleker DG, Tenscher J, et al. (2014) Professional campaigning online: The role of new media as campaign platforms. Paper presented at the ECPR, Glasgow.
35.
Van de WardtMDe VriesCEHoboltSB (2014) Exploiting the cracks: Wedge issues in multiparty competition. The Journal of Politics76(4): 986–999.
36.
Van der EijkCFranklinMN (2004) Potential for contestation on European matters at national elections in Europe. In: MarksGSteenbergenMR (eds) European Integration and Political Conflict, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 32–50.
37.
Van NoijeLKleinnijenhuisJOegemaD (2008) Loss of parliamentary control due to mediatization and Europeanization: A longitudinal and cross-sectional analysis of agenda building in the United Kingdom and the Netherlands. British Journal of Political Science38(3): 455–478.
38.
WilliamsCSpoonJJ (2015) Differentiated party response: The effect of Eurosceptic public opinion on party positions. European Union Politics16(2): 176–193.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
