In this article we seek to understand whether, how and under what conditions political parties publicly articulate matters of European integration and encourage contestation over Europe. Based on a content analysis of parties’ televised advertising spots during the 2009 European Parliament (EP) election campaign in six countries (Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Germany, the Netherlands, Spain, the United Kingdom), we find evidence that European Union (EU) issues and actors are more prominent on the campaign agenda in countries with many Eurosceptic parties. Eurosceptic and non-Eurosceptic parties co-orient themselves towards each other in their EU articulation. Finally, contestation over Europe exists in the realm of identity politics: right-wing fringe parties (and in some countries also mainstream parties) characterize the EU as a threat to national sovereignty and identity, whereas left-wing mobilization against the EU on economic matters is hardly visible. Regarding the two politicization dimensions — EU articulation and contestation — we show that party campaigns cannot be described as purely second-order national contests any more. Instead, the strategic party mobilization model seems to better characterize the 2009 EP campaigns.
Adam S. ( 2007) Domestic adaptations of Europe: A comparative study of the debates on EU enlargement and a common constitution in the German and French quality press. International Journal of Public Opinion Research19(4): 409-433.
2.
Adam S., Maier M. and Kaid LL ( 2009) Codebook of Content Coding: Strategies of Party Campaigns in the Context of the EP Elections. Berlin/ Landau: URL: http//www.uni-koblenz-landau.de/landau/fb8/ikms/ikm/forschung/biad .
3.
Braun D., Mikhaylov S. and Schmitt H. ( 2010) EES 2009 Manifesto Study Documentation, 01/ 04/2010, www.piredeu.eu.
4.
Cayrol R. ( 1991) European elections and the pre-electoral period. Media use and campaign evaluations. European Journal of Political Research19(1): 17-29.
5.
De Vreese CH ( 2003) Framing Europe: Television News and European Integration . Amsterdam: Aksant Academic Publishers .
6.
De Vreese CH and Boomgaarden HG ( 2006) Media effects on public opinion about the enlargement of theEuropean Union. Journal of Common Market Studies44(2): 419-436.
7.
De Vreese CH and Tobiasen M. ( 2007) Conflict and identity: Explaining turnout and antiintegrationist voting in the Danish 2004 elections for theEuropean Parliament. Scandinavian Political Studies30(1): 87-114.
8.
De Vreese CH, Banducci SA, Semetko HA and Boomgaarden HG ( 2006) The news coverage of the 2004 European parliamentary election campaign in 25 countries. European Union Politics7(4): 477-504.
9.
De Vries CE and Edwards EE ( 2009) Taking Europe to its extremes: Extremist parties and public euroscepticism. Party Politics15(1): 5-28.
10.
De Wilde P. ( 2007) Politicisation of European integration: Bringing the process into focus. ARENA Working Paper Series 2007/18. ARENA: University of Oslo.
11.
Edwards EE ( 2009) Products of their past? Cleavages and intra-party dissent over European integration. Political Science Series. Vienna : Institute for Advanced Studies.
12.
EES [European Election Studies’ (2009 ) European Parliament Election Study 2009: Manifesto Study Data . Advanced release URL: http//www.piredeu.eu/public/EES2009.asp .
13.
Eichenberg R. and Dalton R. ( 2007) Postmaastricht blues: The transformation of citizen support for European integration, 1973-2004. Acta Politica42(2): 123-152.
14.
Esser F., Holtz-Bacha C. and Lessinger EM ( 2005) Sparsam in jeder Hinsicht: Die Fernsehwahlwerbung der Parteien im Europawahlkampf 2004. In: Holtz-Bacha C (ed.) Europawahl 2004: Die Massenmedien im Europawahlkampf . Wiesbaden: VS, 65-89.
15.
Ferrara F. and Weishaupt JT ( 2004) Get your act together: Party performance in European Parliament elections. European Union Politics5(3): 283-306.
16.
Follesdal A. and Hix S. ( 2005) Why there is a democratic deficit in the EU: A response to Majone and Moravcsik. European Governance Papers (EUROGOV), C-05-02.
17.
Franklin M. and Van der Eijk C. ( 2006) The sleeping giant: Potential for political mobilization of disaffection in Europe. In: Van der Brug W and Van der Eijk C (eds) European Elections and Domestic Politics: Lessons from the Past and Scenarios for the Future. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 189-208.
18.
Hix S. ( 1999) Dimensions and alignments in European Union politics: Cognitive constraints and partisan responses. European Journal of Political Research35(1): 69-106.
19.
Hix S. ( 2005) The Political System of the European Union. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
20.
Holtz-Bacha C. ( 2005) Massenmedien und Europawahlen: Low key campaigns - low key response. In: Holtz-Bacha C (ed.) Europawahlen 2004: Die Massenmedien im Europawahlkampf. Wiesbaden: VS, 7-34.
21.
Hooghe L. and Marks G. ( 2002) Does left/ right structure party positions on European integration?Comparative Political Studies35(8): 965-989.
22.
Hooghe L. and Marks G. ( 2005) Calculation, community and cues: Public opinion onEuropean integration. European Union Politics6(4): 419-443.
23.
Hooghe L. and Marks G. ( 2008) A postfunctionalist theory of European integration: From permissive consensus to constraining dissensus. British Journal of Political Science39(1): 1-23.
24.
Jalali C. and Silva T. ( 2011) Everyone ignores Europe? Party campaign and media coverage in the 2009 European Parliament elections. Maier M, Strömbäck J and Kaid LL (eds) European Political Communication: Campaign Strategies, Media Coverage, and Campaign Effects in European Parliamentary Elections. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing , S. 111-126.
25.
Jones CA ( 2011) The legal institutional framework of the 2009 European Parliament elections in the shadow of the Lisbon Treaty. Maier M, Strömbäck J and Kaid LL (eds) European Political Communication: Campaign Strategies, Media Coverage, and Campaign Effects in European Parliamentary Elections. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing, S. 17-42.
26.
Kriesi H. ( 2008) Rejoinder to Liesbet Hooghe and Gary Marks: ‘A postfunctional theory of European integration: From permissive consensus to constraining dissensus’. British Journal of Political Science39(1): 221-224.
27.
Kriesi H., Grande E., Lachat R., Dolezal M., Bornschier S. and Frey T. ( 2006) Globalization and the transformation of the national political space: Six European countries compared. European Journal of Political Research45(6): 921-956.
28.
Lindberg L. and Scheingold S. ( 1970) Europe’s Would-Be Polity: Patterns of Change in the European Community. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
29.
Machill M., Beiler M. and Fischer C. ( 2006) Europe-topics in Europe’s media: The debate about the European public sphere: A meta-analysis of media content analyses. European Journal of Communication21: 57-88.
30.
Maier J. and Rittberger B. ( 2008) Shifting Europe’s boundaries: Mass media, public opinion and the enlargement of the EU. European Union Politics9(2): 243-267.
31.
Maier M. and Maier J. ( 2008) News coverage of EU Parliamentary elections. In: Strömbäck J and Kaid LL (eds) The Handbook of Election News Coverage around the World. New York: Routledge, 403-420.
32.
Marks G., Hooghe L., Nelson M. and Edwards EE ( 2006) Party competition and European integration in the East and West. Comparative Political Studies39(2): 155-175.
33.
Netjes CE and Binnema HA ( 2007) The salience of the European integration issue: Three data sources compared. Electoral Studies26(1): 39-49.
34.
North RC, Holsti OR, Zaninovich MG and Zinnes DA ( 1963) Content Analysis: A Handbook with Applications for the Study of International Crisis. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
35.
Rabinowitz G., Macdonald SE and Listhaug O. ( 1991) New players in an old game: Party strategy in multiparty systems. Comparative Political Studies24: 147-185.
36.
Reif K. and Schmitt H. ( 1980) Nine second-order national elections: A conceptual framework for the analysis of European election results. European Journal of Political Research8(1): 3-45.
37.
Risse T. ( 2010) A Community of Europeans? Transnational Identities and Public Spheres. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
38.
Schmidt VA ( 2006) Democracy in Europe: The EU and National Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
39.
Schmitt H. ( 2005) The European Parliament elections of June 2004: Still second-order? West European Politics28(3): 650-679.
40.
Schuck A. and De Vreese CH ( 2006) Between risk and opportunity: News framing and its effects on public support for EU enlargement. European Journal of Communication21(1): 5-32.
41.
Steenbergen MR and Scott DJ ( 2004) Contesting Europe? The salience of European integration as a party issue. In: Marks G and Steenbergen MR (eds) European Integration and Political Conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 165-192.
42.
Stegmüller W. ( 1983) Probleme und Resultate der Wissenschaftstheorie und analytischen Philosophie (Vol. 1. Erklärung, Begründung, Kausalität). Berlin / Heidelberg / New York: Springer .
43.
Van der Eijk C. and Franklin MN ( 2004) Potential for contestation on European matters at national elections in Europe. In: Marks G and Steenbergen MR (eds) European Integration and Political Conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 32-50.
44.
Vliegenthart R., Schuck A., Boomgaarden H. and De Vreese CH ( 2008) News coverage and support for European integration 1990-2006 . International Journal of Public Opinion Research20(4): 415-439.
45.
Weber T. ( 2007) Campaign effects and second-order cycles: A top-down approach to European Parliament elections. European Union Politics8(4): 509-536.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
