This article offers an empirically driven critical consideration of the idea of transnationalising Europe’s voting space, which would mean allowing European citizens to vote for a party from any member state at the European Parliament elections. We argue that such a move would reduce the second-order problem in European elections, as it would force political parties to move away from campaigning solely on national issues. We also claim that it would improve the extent to which Europeans are represented in their parliament and would be particularly welcomed by citizens currently dissatisfied with the state of their national democracy. We offer evidence to back up these claims, based on data on the political preferences of almost half a million Europeans and 274 European parties.
BernhagenPSchmittH (2014) Knowledge and vote choice in second-order elections: Results from a deliberative polling experiment. European Union Politics15(3): 311–327.
4.
BlondelJSinnottRSvenssonP (1997) Representation and voter participation. European Journal of Political Research32(2): 243–272.
5.
BressanelliE (2012) National parties and group membership in the EP: Ideology or pragmatism?Journal of European Public Policy19(5): 737–754.
FearonJD (1999) Electoral accountability and the control of politicians: Selecting good types versus sanctioning poor performance. In: ManinBPrzeworskiAStokesSC (eds) Democracy, Accountability and Representation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 55–97.
11.
FishkinJLuskinRSiuA (2014) Europolis and the European public sphere: Empirical explorations of a counterfactual ideal. European Union Politics15(3): 328–351.
12.
Garzia D and Marschall S (eds) (2014) Matching Voters with Parties and Candidates. Voting Advice Applications in Comparative Perspective. Colchester: ECPR Press.
13.
HixS (2006) Why the EU needs (left-right) politics? Policy reforms and accountability are impossible without it. In: BartoliniSHixS (eds) Politics: The Right or Wrong Kind of Medicine for the EU?, Notre Europe: Policy Paper No 19, pp. 2–27. Berlin, Germany.
14.
HixSLordC (1997) Political Parties in the European Union, London: Macmillan.
15.
HixSMarshM (2011) Second-order effects plus pan-European political swings: An analysis of EP elections across time. Electoral Studies30(1): 4–15.
16.
HoboltSBSpoonJJTilleyJ (2009) A vote against Europe? Explaining defection at the 1999 and 2004 EP elections. British Journal of Political Science39(1): 93–115.
17.
HosliMO (1997) Voting strength in the EP: The influence of national and of partisan actors. European Journal of Political Research31(3): 351–366.
18.
Johansson KM (2009) The emergence of political parties at european level: Integration unaccomplished. In: Pehrson L, Oxelheim L and Gustavsson S (eds) How Unified is the European Union. London: Springer.
19.
LaceyJ (2014) Must Europe be Swiss? On the idea of a voting space and the possibility of a multilingual demos. British Journal of Political Science44(1): 61–82.
20.
LefkofridiZKatsanidouA (2014) Multilevel representation in the EP. European Union Politics15(1): 108–131.
21.
Lord C (2004) A Democratic Audit of the European Union. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
22.
MairPThomassenJ (2010) Political representation and government in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy17(1): 20–35.
23.
MansbridgeJ (2009) A “Selection Model” of political representation. Journal of Political Philosophy17(4): 369–398.
24.
Marschall S (2014) Profiling users. In: Garzia D and Marschall S (eds) Matching Voters with Parties and Candidates: Voting Advice Applications in a Comparative Perspective. Colchester: ECPR Press.
25.
PitkinH (1967) The Concept of Representation, Berkeley: University of California Press.
26.
PridhamGPridhamP (1981) Transnational Party Co-operation and European Integration: The Process Towards Direct Elections, London: Allen & Unwin.
27.
RehfeldA (2009) Representation rethought: On trustees, delegates and gyroscopes in the study of political representation and democracy. American Political Science Review103(2): 214–230.
28.
ReifKSchmittH (1980) Nine second-order national elections – A conceptual framework for the analysis of European election results. European Journal of Political Research8(1): 3–44.
29.
SchimmelfennigF (2010) The normative origins of democracy in the EU: Toward a transformational theory of democracy. European Political Science Review2(2): 211–233.
30.
Schmidt-Kessen M and Moitinho de Almeida L (2012) Obliging European parties to participate in the transnationalization of European politics. In: The EU and the World: New Challenges and Trends, Florence, Italy, 31 May–1 June 2012. Available at: http://www.rise.unifi.it/upload/sub/florence-conference-portugal-paper.pdf (accessed 1 May 2015).
31.
SchmittH (2005) The EP elections of June 2004: Still second-order?West European Politics28(3): 650–679.
TrechselAHMairP (2011) When parties (also) position themselves: An introduction to the EU profiler. Journal of Information Technology and Politics8(1): 1–20.
34.
UrbinatiN (2006) Representative Government: Principles and Genealogy, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
35.
Van Parijs P (2011) Linguistic Justice for Europe and the World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
36.
WagnerMRuusuvirtaO (2012) Matching voters to parties: Voting advice applications and models of party choice. Acta Politica47(4): 400–422.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
