Although talk of a ‘Europe of the regions’ has come and gone, regions have come to Brussels but stayed. While such mobilisation has not led to the emergence of a ‘third level’, regional officials in Brussels sometimes outnumber their peers from their country’s permanent representation. Considering the perseverance and size of such a presence, we explore what factors best account for it. To this end, a series of multi-level models inform us about its determinants. Controlling for a number of economic and demographic factors, we find that different dimensions of regional authority matter when accounting for regional presence in Brussels. These findings stress the importance of domestic institutional factors when analysing the extent to which regions project themselves supranationally.
AldecoaFKeatingM (1999) Paradiplomacy in Action: The Foreign Relations of Subnational Governments, London: Frank Cass.
2.
BauerMW (2006) The German Länder and the European Constitutional Treaty – Heading for a differentiated theory of regional elite support for European integration. Regional and Federal Studies16(1): 21–42.
3.
Berkhout J (2010) Political Activities of Interest Organizations: Conflicting Interests, Converging Strategies. Leiden: University of Leiden.
4.
BernhagenPMitchellNJ (2009) The determinants of direct corporate lobbying in the European Union. European Union Politics10(2): 155–176.
5.
BeyersJ (2004) Voice and access: Political practices of European interest associations. European Union Politics5(2): 211–240.
6.
BlatterJKreutzerMRentlM (2008) The foreign relations of European regions: Competences and strategies. West European Politics31(3): 464–490.
7.
BlatterJKreutzerMRentlM (2009) Preconditions for foreign activities of European Regions: Tracing causal configurations of economic, cultural and political strategies. Publius: The Journal of Federalism40(1): 171–199.
8.
BoomgaardenHGSchuckARTElenbaasM (2011) Mapping EU attitudes: Conceptual and empirical dimensions of Euroscepticism and EU support. European Union Politics12(2): 241–266.
9.
BörzelT (2005) Mind the gap! European integration between level and scope. Journal of European Public Policy12(2): 217–236.
10.
Brigevich A (2012) Pairing up or paring down? Exploring regional identity combinations in the EU. In: Council for European Studies Conference, Council for European Studies, Boston, p. 42.
11.
CallananM (2011) EU decision-making: Reinforcing interest group relationships with national governments?Journal of European Public Policy18(1): 17–34.
12.
Charron N, Dijkstra L and Lapuente V (2013) Regional governance matters: Quality of government within European Union member states. Regional Studies (forthcoming).
13.
CoenD (1998) The European business interest and the nation state: Large firm lobbying in the European Union and member states. Journal of Public Policy18(1): 75–100.
14.
Committee of the Regions (2010) Consultation Report. Building Europe in Partnership, Brussels: Committee of the Regions.
15.
Committee of the Regions and DG Regional Policy (2008) Regional offices contact directory. Committee of the Regions, Brussels, 136.
16.
de RooijR (2002) The impact of the European Union on local government in the Netherlands. Journal of European Public Policy9(3): 447–467.
17.
DonasTBeyersJ (2013) How regions assemble in Brussels: The organizational form of territorial representation in the European Union. Publius: The Journal of Federalism43(4): 527–550.
18.
FiksdalIM (2011) “It’s Not About Winning, It’s About Participating”. Uncovering the Determinants of Regional Participation in the Policy-Making Structure of the European Union, Bergen: University of Bergen.
19.
FleurkeFWillemseR (2006) The European Union and the autonomy of sub-national authorities: Towards an analysis of constraints and opportunities in sub-national decision-making. Regional and Federal Studies16(1): 83–98.
20.
GelmanAHillJ (2007) Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21.
GreenwoodJ (2011) Actors of the common interest? The Brussels offices of the regions. Journal of European Integration33(4): 437–451.
22.
Hoegenauer A-L (2011) The impact of formal rules on informal cooperation: Domestic European policy-making in comparative perspective. In: ECPR general conference, ECPR, Reykjavik.
23.
HoogheL (1995) Subnational mobilization in the European Union. West European Politics18(3): 175–198.
24.
HoogheL (1996) Cohesion Policy and European Integration: Building Multi-level Governance, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
25.
HoogheLMarksG (2001) Multi-level Governance and European Integration, Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.
26.
HoogheLMarksG (2009a) Does efficiency shape the territorial structure of government?Annual Review of Political Science12: 225–241.
27.
HoogheLMarksG (2009b) A postfunctionalist theory of European integration: From permissive consensus to constraining dissensus. British Journal of Political Science39(1): 1–23.
28.
HoogheLMarksGSchakelAH (2010) The Rise of Regional Authority: A Comparative Study of 42 Democracies, Abingdon: Routledge.
29.
JaurschJ (2012) Regional Interest Representation in the EU: A Qualitative Intra-national Comparison Among German States, Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
30.
JefferyC (1997) The Regional Dimension of the European Union. Towards a Third Level in Europe?, London: Frank Cass.
31.
JefferyC (2007) A regional rescue of the nation-state: Changing regional perspectives on Europe. Europa Institute Mitchell Working Paper Series5: 1–16.
32.
KeatingM (2008) Thirty years of territorial politics. West European Politics31(1 & 2): 60–81.
33.
KeatingM (2009) European devolution. In: FlindersMGambleAHayC (eds) The Oxford Handbook of British Politics, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 423–437.
34.
KeatingMLoughlinJ (1997) The Political Economy of Regionalism, London: Frank Cass.
35.
KeatingMLoughlinJDeschouwerC (2003) Culture, Institutions and Economic Development. A Study of Eight European Regions, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
36.
KettunenPKullM (2009) Governing Europe: The status and networking strategies of finish, Estonian and German subnational offices in Brussels. Regional and Federal Studies19(1): 117–142.
37.
KnodtMGreenwoodJQuittkatcC (2011) Territorial and functional interest representation in EU governance. Journal of European Integration33(4): 349–367.
38.
LeonS (2012) How do citizens attribute responsibility in multilevel states? Learning, biases and asymmetric federalism. Evidence from Spain. Electoral Studies31(1): 120–130.
39.
MahoneyC (2007) Lobbying success in the United States and the European Union. Journal of Public Policy27(1): 35–56.
40.
MarksGHaeslyRMbayeH (2002) What do subnational offices think they are doing in Brussels?Regional and Federal Studies12(3): 1–23.
41.
MarksGHoogheLBlankK (1996a) European integration from the 1980s: State-centric v. multi-level governance. Journal of Common Market Studies34(3): 341–378.
42.
MarksGMcAdamD (1996) Social movements and the changing structure of political opportunity in the European Union. In: MarksGScharpfFSchmitterP (eds) Governance in the European Union, London: Sage, pp. 95–120.
43.
MarksGNielsenFRayL (1996b) Competencies, cracks, and conflicts: Regional mobilization in the European Union. Comparative Political Studies29(2): 164–192.
44.
Mbaye H (2009) So what’s new? Mapping a longitudinal regional office footprint in Brussels. In: European Union Studies Association. Marina del Rey, CA: European Union Studies Association.
45.
MichelmannHSoldatosP (1991) Federalism and International Relations: The Role of Subnational Units, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
46.
MolsFJettenJHaslamSA (2009) EU identification and endorsement in context: The importance of regional identity salience. Journal of Common Market Studies47(3): 601–623.
47.
MooreC (2008a) Beyond conditionality? Regions from the new EU member states and their activities in Brussels. Comparative European Politics6(2): 212–234.
48.
MooreC (2008b) A Europe of the regions vs. the regions in Europe: Reflections on regional engagement in Brussels. Regional and Federal Studies18(5): 517–535.
49.
NielsenFSalkJ (1998) Ecology of collective action and regional representation in the European Union. European Sociological Review14(3): 231–254.
50.
Poloni-StaudingerLM (2008) The domestic opportunity structure and supranational activity: An explanation of environmental group activity at the European Union level. European Union Politics9(4): 531–558.
51.
PrincenSKerremansB (2008) Opportunity structures in the EU multi-level system. West European Politics31(6): 1129–1146.
52.
QuittkatCKotzianP (2011) Lobbying via consultation – Territorial and functional interests in the Commission’s consultation regime. Journal of European Integration33(4): 401–418.
53.
RoweC (2011) Regional Representations in the EU: Between Diplomacy and Interest Mediation, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
54.
Salk JE, Nielsen F and Marks G (2001) Patterns of cooperation among regional offices in Brussels: Homophily, complementarity, and national embeddedness. In: Southern Sociological Society, Southern Sociological Society, Atlanta, p. 40.
55.
SchakelA (2008) Validation of the regional authority index. Regional and Federal Studies18(2): 143–166.
56.
ScharpfF (1999) Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic?, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
57.
SchmitterP (2000) How to Democratize the European Union…and Why Bother?, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
58.
StudingerP (2013) Wettrennen der Regionen nach Brüssel: Die Entwicklung der Regionalvertretungen, Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
59.
TathamM (2013) Paradiplomats against the state: Explaining conflict in state and sub-state interest representation in Brussels. Comparative Political Studies46(1): 63–94.
60.
Tatham M and Bauer MW (2014) Competence ring-fencing from below? The drivers of regional demands for control over upwards dispersion. Journal of European Public Policy 21(9): forthcoming.
61.
UsherwoodSStartinN (2013) Euroscepticism as a persistent phenomenon. Journal of Common Market Studies51(1): 1–16.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
