Recent scholarship has emphasized the importance of concepts rooted in social identity for understanding citizen attitudes towards the European Union (EU). This article builds upon prior research by developing an argument that authoritarians are more likely to oppose the EU and to hold exclusionary social identity attitudes. Authoritarians, who have a predisposition towards order and conformity, are likely to oppose the EU as it threatens the established social and political order of the sovereign state and the dominant national culture. In addition, authoritarians are more likely to express exclusionary social identities. Analysis of survey data finds support for these claims and demonstrates that authoritarianism decreases support for the EU directly and indirectly through various indicators of social identity attitudes.
AdornoTFrankel-BrunswickELevinsonDJ (1950) The Authoritarian Personality, New York: Wiley.
2.
AltemeyerR (1996) The Authoritarian Specter, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
3.
AndersonCJ (1998) When in doubt, use proxies: Attitudes toward domestic politics and support for European integration. Comparative Political Studies31(5): 569–601.
4.
AzroutRvan SpanjeJde VreeseC (2011) Talking Turkey: Anti-immigrant attitudes and their effect on support for Turkish membership of the EU. European Union Politics12(1): 3–19.
5.
BarkerDCTinnickJDIII (2006) Competing visions of parental roles and ideological constraint. American Political Science Review100(2): 249–263.
6.
BoomgaardenHGFreireA (2009) Religion and Euroscepticism: Direct, indirect, or no effects?West European Politics32(6): 1240–1265.
7.
CareyS (2002) Undivided loyalties? Is national identity an obstacle to European integration?European Union Politics3(4): 387–413.
8.
ChristinTTrechselA (2002) Joining the EU? Explaining public opinion in Switzerland. European Union Politics3(4): 415–443.
9.
De VreeseCBoomgaardenH (2005) Projecting European referendums: Fear of immigration and support for European integration. European Union Politics6(1): 59–82.
10.
De VreeseCVan Der BrugWHoboltS (2012) Turkey in the EU? How cultural and economic frames affect support for Turkish accession. Comparative European Politics10(2): 218–235.
11.
De VriesCE (2007) Sleeping giant: Fact or fairytale? How European integration affects national elections. European Union Politics8(3): 363–385.
12.
DuckittJ (1989) Authoritarianism and group conflict: A new view of an old construct. Political Psychology10(1): 63–84.
13.
ElgünÖTillmanER (2007) Exposure to European Union policies and support for membership in the candidate countries. Political Research Quarterly60(3): 391–400.
14.
FeldmanS (2003) Enforcing social conformity: A theory of authoritarianism. Political Psychology24(1): 41–74.
15.
FeldmanSStennerK (1997) Perceived threat and authoritarianism. Political Psychology18(4): 741–770.
16.
FlanaganSCLeeAR (2003) The new politics, culture wars, and the authoritarian-libertarian value change in advanced industrial democracies. Comparative Political Studies36(3): 235–270.
17.
GabelM (1998) Interests and Integration: Market Liberalization, Public Opinion, and European Union, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
18.
GelmanAHillJ (2007) Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models, New York: Cambridge University Press.
19.
HetheringtonMJWeilerJD (2009) Authoritarianism and Polarization in American Politics, New York: Cambridge University Press.
20.
Hobolt S (2008) Europe in Question: Referendums on European Integration. New York: Oxford University Press.
21.
HoboltSBVan Der BrugWDe VreeseCH (2011) Religious intolerance and Euroscepticism. European Union Politics12(3): 359–379.
22.
HoogheL (2003) Europe divided: Elites vs. public opinion on European integration. European Union Politics4(3): 281–305.
23.
HoogheLMarksG (2005) Calculation, community, and cues: Public opinion on European integration. European Union Politics6(4): 419–443.
24.
Hooghe L and Marks G (2009) A postfunctionalist theory of European integration: From permissive consensus to constraining dissensus. British Journal of Political Science 39(1): 1–23.
25.
InglehartR (1970) Cognitive mobilization and European identity. Comparative Politics3(1): 45–70.
26.
JanssenJH (1991) Postmaterialism, cognitive mobilization, and support for European integration. British Journal of Political Science21(4): 443–468.
27.
KemmelmeierM (2010) Authoritarianism and its relationship with intuitive-experiential cognitive style and heuristic processing. Personality and Individual Differences48(1): 44–48.
28.
KinderDRKamCD (2009) Us Against Them: Ethnocentric Foundations of American Opinion, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
29.
KohnM (1977) Class and Conformity, 2nd ed. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
30.
LavineHLodgeMFreitasK (2005) Threat, authoritarianism, and selective exposure to Information. Political Psychology26(2): 219–244.
31.
LindbergLScheingoldS (1970) Europe’s Would-Be Polity: Patterns in the European Community, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
32.
LuedtkeA (2005) European integration, public opinion, and immigration policy: Testing the impact of national identity. European Union Politics6(1): 83–112.
33.
MartinJG (1964) The Tolerant Personality, Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press.
34.
MattilaMRaunioT (2006) Cautious voters—supportive parties: Opinion congruence between voters and parties on the EU dimension. European Union Politics7(4): 427–449.
35.
McCourtKBouchardTJJrLykkenDT (1999) Authoritarianism revisited: Genetic and environmental influences examined in twins reared apart and together. Personality and Individual Differences27(5): 985–1014.
36.
McFarlandSGAgeyevVSAbalakina-PoppMA (1992) Authoritarianism in the former Soviet Union. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology63(6): 1004–1010.
37.
McLarenL (2002) Public support for the European Union: Cost/benefit analysis or perceived cultural threat?Journal of Politics64(2): 551–566.
38.
NelsenBFGuthJLFraserCR (2002) Does religion matter? Christianity and public support for the European Union. European Union Politics2(2): 191–217.
39.
NelsenBFGuthJLHightowerB (2011) Does religion still matter? Religion and public attitudes toward integration in Europe. Politics and Religion4(1): 1–26.
40.
RohrschneiderR (2002) The democracy deficit and mass support for an EU-wide government. American Journal of Political Science46(2): 463–475.
41.
Sniderman PM and Piazza TL(1993) The Scar of Race. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
42.
SteenbergenMRJonesBS (2002) Modeling multilevel data structures. American Journal of Political Science46(1): 218–237.
43.
StennerK (2005) The Authoritarian Dynamic, New York: Cambridge University Press.
44.
TajfelH (1978) Differentiation Between Social Groups: Studies in the Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, London, UK: Academic Press.
45.
TillmanER (2004) The European Union at the ballot box? European integration and voting behavior in the new member states. Comparative Political Studies37(5): 590–610.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
