How does ideological congruency affect the speed of legislative decision-making in the European Union? Despite the crucial importance of actor preferences, the effect of partisan alignments and ideological composition of the European institutions has largely been neglected. However, we argue that the ideological congruence between legislative bodies has an important effect on the duration of policy-making. We test our theoretical expectations based on a large new dataset on decision-making speed in the European Union using event history analysis. The findings confirm our theoretical claim indicating that the ideological distance between the European institutions slows down policy-making which has important implications for the problem-solving capacity of political systems more generally.
Box-SteffensmeierJMZornCJW (2001) Duration models and proportional hazards in political science. Americal Journal of Political Science45(4): 972–988.
2.
BudgeIKlingemannHDVolkensABaraJTanenbaumE (2001) Mapping Policy Preferences: Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments 1945–1998Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3.
BurnsC (2004) Codecision and the European commission: A study of declining influence?. Journal of European Public Policy11(1): 1–18.
4.
CalvoESagarzazuI (2011) Legislator success in committee: Gatekeeping authority and the loss of majority control. American Journal of Political Science55(1): 1–15.
5.
ClevesMGouldWGutierrezRMachenkoY (2008) An Introduction to Survival Analysis Using StataCollege Station, TX, USA: Stata Press
6.
CoxGWMcCubbinsMD (1993) Legislative Leviathan: Party Government in the HouseBerkeley, CA, USA: University of California Press
7.
DownsA (1957) An Economic Theory of DemocracyNew York: Harper.
8.
DöringH (1995) Time as a scarce resource: Government control of the agenda. In: DöringH (eds) Parliaments and Majority Rule in Western Europe. FrankfurtCampus223–246.
9.
DrünerDKlüverHMastenbroekESchneiderG (2012) The Core or the Winset? Explaining Decision-Making Duration and Policy Change in the European UnionWorking Paper
10.
GabelMHixS (2002) Defining the EU political space: An empirical study of the European elections manifestos, 1979–1999. Comparative Political Studies35(8): 934–964.
11.
GoetzKH (2009) How does the EU tick? Five propositions on political time. Journal of European Public Policy16(2): 202–220.
12.
GolubJ (1999) In the shadow of the vote? Decision making in the European Community. International Organization53(4): 733–764.
13.
GolubJ (2002) Institutional reform and decisionmaking in the European Union. In: HosliMvan DeemenA (eds) Institutional challenges in the European Union. London, UK: Routledge134–154.
14.
GolubJ (2007) Survival analysis and European Union decision-making. European Union Politics8(2): 155–179.
15.
GolubJ (2008) The study of decision-making speed in the European union: Methods, data and theory. European Union Politics9(1): 167–179.
16.
GolubJSteunenbergB (2007) How time affects EU decision-making. European Union Politics8(4): 555–566.
17.
HagemannSHøylandB (2008) Parties in the Council?. Journal of European Public Policy15(8): 1205–1221.
18.
HixS (2002) Parliamentary behavior with two principals: Preferences, parties, and voting in the European Parliament. American Journal of Political Science46(3): 688–698.
19.
HixS (2004) Electoral institutions and legislative behavior: Explaining voting defection in the European Parliament. World Politics56(2): 194–223.
20.
HixSNouryARolandG (2005) Power to the parties: Cohesion and competition in the European Parliament, 1979–2001. British Journal of Political Science35(2): 209–234.
21.
HowellWScott AdlerACCRiemannC (2000) Divided government and legislative productivity of congress, 1945–1994. Legislative Studies Quarterly25: 285–312.
22.
HägeF (2011) The European Union policy-making dataset. European Union Politics12(3): 455–477.
23.
KardashevaR (2009) The power to delay: The European Parliament's influence in the consultation procedure. Journal of Common Market Studies47(2): 385–409.
24.
KlingemannHDVolkensABaraJBudgeIMcDonaldM (2006) Mapping Policy Preferences II: Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments in Eastern Europe, European Union and OECD 1990–2003Oxford: Oxford University Press.
25.
KlüverHRodonT (2012) Explaining policy position choice of Europarties: The effect of legislative resources. British Journal of Political ScienceEpub ahead of print doi:10.1017/S0007123412000543.
26.
KönigT (2007) Divergence or convergence? From ever-growing to ever-slowing European legislative decision making. European Journal of Political Research46(3): 417–444.
27.
KönigT (2008) Analysing the process of EU legislative decision-making: To make a long story short…. European Union Politics9(1): 145–165.
28.
KovatsL (2009) Do elections set the pace? A quantitative assessment of the timing of European legislation. Journal of European Public Policy16(2): 239–255.
29.
KreppelATsebelisG (1999) Coalition formation in the European parliament. Comparative Political Studies32(8): 933–966.
30.
MattilaMLaneJE (2001) Why unanimity in the Council?. European Union Politics2(1): 31–52.
31.
McElroyGBenoitK (2007) Party groups and policy positions in the European Parliament. Party Politics13(1): 5–28.
32.
McElroyGBenoitK (2010) Party policy and group affiliation in the European Parliament. British Journal of Political Science40(02): 377–398.
33.
MoravcsikA (1998) The Choice for Europe: Social Purpose and State Power From Rome to MaastrichtIthaca: Cornell University Press.
34.
RasmussenAToshkovD (2010) The inter-institutional division of power and time allocation in the European parliament. West European Politics34(1): 71–96.
35.
SandholtzWStone SweetA (1998) European Integration and Supranational GovernanceOxford: Oxford University Press.
36.
SchulzHKönigT (2000) Institutional reform and decision-making efficiency in the European Union. American Journal of Political Science44(4): 653–666.
37.
ThomsonR (2011) Resolving Controversy in the European Union: Legislative Decision-Making Before and After EnlargementCambridge: Cambridge University Press.
38.
Toshkov D and Rasmussen A (2012) Time to decide: The effect of early agreements on legislative duration in the EU. European Integration Online Papers (EIoP) 16(article 11). Available at: http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/2012-011a.htm.
39.
TsebelisG (1995) Decision making in political systems: Veto players in presidentialism, parliamentarism, multicamerialism and multipartyism. British Journal of Political Science25(3): 289–325.
40.
TsebelisG (1999) Veto players and law production in parliamentary democracies: An empirical analysis. American Political Science Review93(3): 591–608.
41.
TsebelisG (2002) Veto Players: How Political Institutions WorkNew York: Sage.
42.
TsebelisGGarrettG (2000) Legislative politics in the European Union. European Union Politics1(1): 9–36.
43.
TsebelisGMoneyJ (1997) BicamerlismCambridge: Cambridge: University Press.
44.
VeenT (2011) Positions and salience in European union politics: A new dataset. European Union Politics12(2): 267–288.
45.
VogelTKovatsLGötzKH (2010) LawLeecher: A software for data extraction from PreLexPotsdam: University of Potsdam.
46.
WarntjenAHixSCrombezC (2008) The party political make-up of EU legislative bodies. Journal of European Public Policy15(8): 1243–1253.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
