The article analyses how enlargements affect the speed of European Union (EU) decision-making. In line with rationalist theories of group choice, we argue that enlargements increase the costs of organizing decisions, i.e. transaction costs. Increasing transaction costs, in turn, slow down EU law-making. We test this theory by estimating Cox regression models that incorporate time-varying covariates on all directives, regulations and decisions submitted by the European Commission between 1976 and 2006. In contrast to previous analyses, we show that an increase in group size indeed slows down EU law-making.
Alesina A. and Spolaore E. ( 2005) The Size of Nations. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.
2.
Baldwin RE and Widgrén M. ( 2004) Council voting in the Constitutional Treaty: Devil in the details. CEPS Policy Brief53.
3.
Best E. and Settembri P. ( 2008) Surviving enlargement: How has the Council managed? In: Best E, Christiansen T and Settembri P (eds) The Institutions of the Enlarged European Union Continuity and Change . Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 34-53.
4.
Box-Steffensmeier J. and Jones B. ( 2004) Event History Modeling in Political Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
5.
Buchanan JMG and Tullock G. ( 1965) The Calculus of Consent. Logical Foundations of Constitutional Democracy. MichiganUniversity of Michigan Press.
6.
Cleves MA, Gutierrez RG and Gould WW ( 2004) An Introduction to Survival Analysis Using Stata , Revised Edition. College Station, TX: Stata Press.
7.
Cornes R. and Sandler T. ( 1996) The Theory of Externalities, Public Goods, and Club Goods , 2nd edn. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
8.
Dahl RA and Tufte ER ( 1973) Size and Democracy. Stanford : Stanford University Press.
9.
Dinan D. ( 1999) Ever Closer Union. An Introduction to European Integration , 2nd edn. New York : Palgrave.
10.
Enelow JM and Hinich MJ ( 1984) The Spatial Theory of Voting: an Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
11.
Golub J. ( 1999) In the shadow of the vote? Decision making in the European Community. International Organization53(4): 733-764.
12.
Golub J. ( 2007) Survival analysis and European Union decision-making . European Union Politics8(2): 155-179.
13.
Golub J. ( 2008a) The study of decision-making speed in the European Union: Methods, data and theory. European Union Politics9(1): 167-179.
14.
Golub J. ( 2008b) Survival analysis. In: Box-Steffensmeier J, Brady H and Collier D (eds) Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 530-546.
15.
Golub J. and Steunenberg B. ( 2007) How time affects EU decision-making. European Union Politics8(4): 555-566.
16.
Grambsch PM and Therneau TM ( 1994) Proportional hazards tests and diagnostics based on weighted residuals. Biometrika81(3): 515-526.
17.
Häge FM ( 2011 forthcoming) The European Union Policy-Making Dataset . European Union Politics12(3).
18.
Hagemann S. ( 2008) Voting, statements and coalition-building in the Council from 1999 to 2006. In: Naurin D and Wallace H (eds) Unveiling the Council of the European Union. Games Governments Play in Brussels. Houndmills : Palgrave Macmillan, 36-63.
19.
Hix S. ( 2008) Towards a partisan theory of EU politics. Journal of European Public Policy15(8): 1254-1265.
20.
Hosli MO and Van Deemen A. ( 2002) Effects of enlargement on efficiency and coalition formation in the Council of the European Union. In: Hosli MO, Van Deemen A and Widgren M (eds) Institutional Challenges in theEuropean Union. London: Routledge, 65-88.
21.
Klingemann HD, Volkens A., Bara J., et al (2006) Mapping Policy Preferences II. Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments in Eastern Europe, the European Union and the OECD 1990-2003. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
22.
König T. ( 2007) Divergence or convergence? From ever-growing to ever-slowing European legislative decision-making. European Journal of Political Research46: 417-444.
23.
König T. ( 2008) Analysing the process of EU legislative decision-making: To make a long story short. European Union Politics9(1): 145-165.
24.
König T. and Bräuninger T. ( 2004) Accession and reform of the European Union: A game-theoretical analysis of Eastern enlargement and the constitutional reform. European Union Politics5(4): 419-439.
25.
König T. and Junge D.(2009) Why don’t veto players use their power? European Union Politics10(4): 507-534.
26.
König T., Luetgert B. and Dannwolf T. ( 2006) Quantifying European legislative research. European Union Politics7(4): 553-574.
27.
Koremenos B., Lipson C. and Snidal D. ( 2001) The rational design of international institutions . International Organization55(4): 761-799.
28.
Michels R. ([ 1910] 1959) Political Parties: a Sociological Study of the Oligarchical Tendencies of Modern Democracy. New York: Dover Publications.
29.
Olson M. ( 1965) The Logic of Collective Action. Public Goods and the Theory of Goods. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
30.
Oye KA ( 1985) Explaining cooperation under anarchy: Hypotheses and strategies . World Politics38(1): 1-24.
31.
Pollack M.(2009) Europe united? The impact of the EU’s eastern enlargement, five years on. European View8(2): 239-254.
32.
Sandler T. and Tschirhart JT ( 1980) The economic theory of clubs: an evaluative survey . Journal of Economic Literature18(4): 1481-1521.
33.
Scharpf FW ( 2006) The joint decision trap revisited. Journal of Common Market Studies44(4): 845-864.
34.
Schneider CJ ( 2009) Conflict, Negotiation and European Union Enlargement . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35.
Schneider G. ( 2002) A never-ending success story? The dynamics of widening and deepening European integration. In: Steunenberg B (ed.) Widening the European Union: The Politics of Institutional Change and Reform. London: Routledge , 183-201.
36.
Schulz H. and König T. ( 2000) Institutional reform and decision-making efficiency in theEuropean Union. American Journal of Political Science44(4): 653-666.
37.
Selck TJ ( 2005) Explaining the absence of inertia in European Union legislative decision-making. Journal of Common Market Studies43(5): 1055-1070.
38.
Selck TJ ( 2006) Preferences and Procedures: European Union Legislative Decision-Making. Dordrecht: Springer .
39.
Simmel G. ([ 1908] 1950) The Sociology of Georg Simmel . Glencoe, IL: The Free Press .
40.
Steunenberg B. ( 2002) An even wider Union. The effects of enlargement on EU decision-making. In: Steunenberg B (ed.) Widening the European Union: The Politics of Institutional Change and Reform . London: Routledge , 97-118.
41.
Thomson R.(2009) Actor alignments in the European Union before and after enlargement . European Journal of Political Research48: 756-781.
42.
Tsebelis G. ( 2002) Veto Players. Princeton, NJ : Princeton University Press.
43.
Tsebelis G. and Yataganas X. ( 2002) Veto players and decision-making in the EU after Nice . Journal of Common Market Studies40: 283-307.
44.
Weber M. ( 1921) Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Tübingen : Mohr.
45.
Zielonka J. ( 2006) Europe as Empire. The Nature of the Enlarged European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
46.
Zimmer C., Schneider G. and Dobbins M. ( 2005) The contested Council: Conflict dimensions of an intergovernmental EU institution. Political Studies53: 403-422.
47.
Zorn C. ( 2007) Temporal change and the process of European Union decision-making . European Union Politics8(4): 567-576.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
