In Europe, a variety of national policies regulate access to citizenship. This article analyses how citizenship policies affect naturalization rates among immigrants. Our analysis confirms that favourable citizenship policies positively affect naturalization rates, especially among first-generation immigrants with more than 5 but fewer than 20 years of residence. However, most variation is explained by other factors. Immigrants from poor, politically unstable, and non-EU countries are more likely to be a citizen of their European country of residence. Other important predictors of the citizenship status of immigrants are language, years of residence (first generation), and age (second generation). Explanations of naturalization rates in Europe should not only take into account institutional conditions but also include other destination and origin country factors and individual characteristics of immigrants.
BernardWS (1936) Cultural determinants of naturalization. American Sociological Review1(6): 943–953.
2.
BauböckR (1994) Transnational Citizenship: Membership and Rights in International Migration. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.
3.
BauböckRFaistT (eds) (2010) Diaspora and Transnationalism: Concepts, Theories and Methods. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
4.
BauböckRErsbøllEGroenendijkKWaldrauchH (eds) (2006) Acquisition and Loss of Nationality. Policies and Trends in 15 European states. Volumes 1 & 2. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
5.
BevelanderPVeenmanJ (2006) Naturalisation and socioeconomic integration: The case of the Netherlands. IZA Discussion Paper No. 2153.
6.
BloemraadI (2002) The North American naturalization gap: An institutional approach to citizenship acquisition in the United States and Canada. International Migration Review36(1): 193–228.
7.
BrubakerR (1992) Citizenship and Nationhood in France and Germany. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8.
ChiswickBRMillerPW (2008) Citizenship in the United States: The roles of immigrant characteristics and country of origin. IZA Discussion Paper No. 3596.
DeSipioL (1987) Social science literature and the naturalization process. International Migration Review21(2): 390–405.
11.
DeVoretzDJ (2008) The economics of citizenship: A common intellectual ground for social scientists?. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies34(4): 679–693.
12.
DeVoretzDPivnenkoS (2005) The economic causes and consequences of Canadian citizenship. Journal of Immigration and Integration6(3–4): 435–468.
13.
ErsanilliEKoopmansR (2010) Rewarding integration? Citizenship regulations and the socio-cultural integration of immigrants in the Netherlands, France and Germany. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies36(5): 773–791.
14.
EvansMDR (1988) Choosing to be a citizen: The time-path of citizenship in Australia. International Migration Review22(2): 243–264.
15.
FoxJ (2005) Unpacking ‘transnational citizenship’. Annual Review of Political Science8: 171–201.
16.
FleischmannFDronkersJ (2007) The effects of social and labour market policies of EU-countries on the socio-economic integration of first and second generation immigrants from different countries of origin. Working paper EUI-RSCAS 2007/19 (European Forum Series).
17.
FranchinoF (2009) Perspectives on European immigration policies. European Union Politics10(3): 403–420.
18.
GoodmanSW (2010) Naturalisation Policies in Europe: Exploring Patterns of Inclusion and Exclusion. Comparative Report, RSCAS/EUDO-CIT-Comp. 2010/7. San Domenico di Fiesole: EUDO Citizenship Observatory.
19.
HarrisJRTodaroMP (1970) Migration, unemployment and development: A two-sector analysis. American Economic Review60: 126–142.
20.
HowardMM (2009) The Politics of Citizenship in Europe. New York: Cambridge University Press.
21.
JanoskiT (2010) The Ironies of Citizenship: Naturalisation and Integration in Industrialized Countries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22.
JassoGRosenzweigM (1986) Family reunification and the immigration multiplier: U.S. immigration law, origin-country conditions, and the reproduction of immigrants. Demography23(3): 291–311.
23.
JonesMP (1996) Indicator and stratification methods for missing explanatory variables in multiple linear regression. Journal of the American Statistical Association91: 222–230.
24.
Jones-CorreaM (2001) Under two flags: Dual nationality in Latin America and its consequences for naturalization in the United States. International Migration Review35(4): 997–1029.
25.
JowellRand the Central Coordinating Team (2005) European Social Survey 2004/2005: Technical Report. London: Centre for Comparative Social Surveys, City University.
26.
JowellRand the Central Coordinating Team (2007) European Social Survey 2006/2007: Technical Report. London: Centre for Comparative Social Surveys, City University.
27.
KaufmannDKraayAMastruzziM (2006) Governance matters V: Aggregate and individual governance indicators for 1996–2005. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 4012.
28.
KossertA (2008) Kalte Heimat. Die Geschichte der Deutschen Vertriebenen nach 1945. Munich: Siedler.
29.
MazzolariF (2007) Dual citizenship rights: Do they make more and better citizens? IZA Discussion Paper 3008.
30.
Ministerie van Justitie (2001) Landenlijst naturalisatie oktober 2001. Tussentijds Berichten Nationaliteiten (TBN 2001/5). Staatscourant180: 20–20.
31.
ModoodTTriandafyllidouAZapata-BarreroR (eds) (2006) Multiculturalism, Muslims and Citizenship: A European Approach. Abingdon: Routledge.
32.
NiessenJHuddlestonTCitronL (2007) Migrant Integration Policy Index. Brussels: British Council and Migration Policy Group.
33.
NorthDS (1987) The long grey welcome: A study of the American naturalization process. International Migration Review21(2): 311–326.
34.
PaulyRJ (2004) Islam in Europe: Integration or Marginalization?. Aldershot: Ashgate.
35.
PortesAZhouM (1993) The new second generation: Segmented assimilation and its variants among post-1965 immigrant youth. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science530(1): 74–98.
36.
ReichelD (2010) Measuring determinants and consequences of citizenship acquisition. Prominstat Working Paper No. 15.
37.
SteinhardtMF (2008) Does citizenship matter? The economic impact of naturalizations in Germany. Centro Studi Luca D’Agliano Development Studies Working Papers No. 266.
38.
ThomsonMCrulM (2007) The second generation in Europe and the United States: How is the transatlantic debate relevant for further research on the European second generation?. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies33(7): 1025–1041.
39.
Van OersR (2009) Justifying citizenship tests in the Netherlands and the UK. In: GuildEGroenendijkKCarreraS (eds) Illiberal Liberal States: Immigration, Citizenship and Integration in the EU Survey. Surrey: Ashgate, pp. 113–130.
40.
Van TubergenFMaasIFlapHD (2004) The economic incorporation of immigrants in 18 western societies: Origin, destination and community effects. American Sociological Review69(5): 704–727.
41.
VinkMDe GrootGR (2010a) Citizenship attribution in Western Europe: International framework and domestic trends. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies36(5): 713–734.
42.
VinkMDe GrootGR (2010b) Birthright Citizenship: Trends and Regulations in Europe. Comparative Report, RSCAS/EUDO-CIT-Comp. 2010/8. San Domenico di Fiesole: EUDO Citizenship Observatory.
43.
WaldrauchH (2006) Statistics on acquisition and loss of nationality. In: BauböckR (eds) Acquisition and Loss of Nationality. Policies and Trends in 15 European States, Volume 1. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, pp. 269–316.
44.
YangPQ (1994) Explaining immigrant naturalization. International Migration Review28(3): 449–477.
45.
ZhouM (1997) Segmented assimilation: Issues, controversies, and recent research on the new second generation. International Migration Review31(4): 825–858.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
