Public attitudes towards the European Union (EU) are at the heart of a growing body of research. The nature, structure and antecedents of these attitudes, however, are in need of conceptual and empirical refinement. With growing diversification of the policies of the Union, a one-dimensional approach to attitudes towards the EU may be insufficient. This study reviews existing approaches towards theorizing EU public opinion. Based on this inventory, originally collected public opinion survey data (n = 1394) indicate the presence of five dimensions of EU attitudes: performance, identity, affection, utilitarianism and strengthening. The study furthermore shows that different predictors of EU public opinion matter to differing extents when explaining these dimensions. In light of these findings, we suggest tightening the link, conceptually and empirically, between attitudinal dimensions and their antecedents.
Anderson CJ ( 1998) When in doubt use proxies: Attitudes to domestic politics and support for the EU. Comparative Political Studies31: 569-601.
2.
Anderson CJ and Reichert MS ( 1996) Economic benefits and support for membership in the European Union: A cross-national analysis. Journal of Public Policy15: 231-249.
3.
Azrout R., van Spanje J. and de Vreese CH ( 2011) Talking Turkey. European Union Politics .
4.
Banducci SA, Karp J. and Loedel P. ( 2003) The euro, economic interests and multi-level governance: Examining support for the common currency. European Journal of Political Research42: 685-703.
5.
Brader T. ( 2006) Campaigning for Hearts and Minds. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
6.
Bruter M. ( 2003) Winning hearts and minds for Europe: the impact of news and symbols on civic and culturalEuropean identity. Comparative Political Studies26(10): 1148-1179.
7.
Burgoon B.(2009) Social nation and social Europe: Support for national and supranational welfare compensation in Europe. European Union Politics10(4): 427-455.
8.
Carey S. ( 2002) Undivided loyalties: Is national identity an obstacle to European integration?European Union Politics3(4): 387-413.
9.
Christin T. and Trechsel AH ( 2002) Joining the EU? Explaining public opinion in Switzerland . European Union Politics3(4): 415-443.
10.
Citrin J. and Sides J. ( 2004) More than nationals: How identity choice matters in the new Europe. In: Hermann RK, Risse T and Brewer MB (eds) Transnational Identities: Becoming European in the EU. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 161-185.
11.
Dalton RJ ( 1984) Cognitive mobilization and partisan dealignment in advanced industrial democracies. Journal of Politics46(1): 264-284.
12.
Dalton RJ and Eichenberg RC ( 1998) Citizen support for policy integration. In: Sandholz W and Sweet AS (eds) European Integration and Supranational Governance . Oxford: Oxford University Press , 250-283.
13.
De Vreese CH and Boomgaarden HG ( 2005) Projecting EU referendums: Fear of immigration and support forEuropean integration. European Union Politics6(1): 59-82.
14.
De Vreese CH and Boomgaarden HG ( 2006) Media effects on public opinion about the enlargement of theEuropean Union. Journal of Common Market Studies44(2): 419-436.
15.
De Vreese CH, Boomgaarden HG and Semetko HA ( 2008) Hard and soft: Predictors of public support for Turkish membership in the EU. European Union Politics9(4): 511-530.
16.
De Vries C. ( 2007) Sleeping giant: Fact or fairytale? How European integration affects national elections. European Union Politics8(3): 363-385.
17.
Decker F. ( 2002) Governance beyond the nation-state: Reflections on the democratic deficit of theEuropean Union. Journal of European Public Policy9(2): 256-272.
18.
Denver D. ( 2002) Voting in the 1997 Scottish and Welsh devolution referendums: Information, interests and opinions. European Journal of Political Research41: 827-843.
19.
DeSteno D., Petty RE, Wegener DT and Rucker DD ( 2000) Beyond valence in the perception of likelihood: the role of emotion specificity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology78: 397-416.
20.
Duch R. and Taylor M. ( 1997) Economics and the vulnerability of the pan-European institutions . Political Behavior19(1): 65-80.
21.
Easton D. ( 1975) A re-assessment of the concept of political support . British Journal of Political Science5: 435-457.
22.
Eichenberg RC and Dalton RJ ( 1993) Europeans and the European Community: the dynamics of public support forEuropean integration. International Organization47(4): 507-534.
23.
Elenbaas M. and De Vreese CH ( 2008) The effects of strategic news on political cynicism and vote choice among young voters. Journal of Communication58: 550-567.
24.
Evans J. ( 2000) Contrasting attitudinal bases to Euroscepticism amongst the French electorate. Electoral Studies19: 539-561.
25.
Evans J. ( 2007) The European dimension in French public opinion . Journal of European Public Policy14(7): 1098-1116.
26.
Franklin M. ( 2002) Learning from the Danish case: a comment on Palle Svensson’s critique of the ‘Franklin Thesis’. European Journal of Political Research41(6): 751-757.
27.
Franklin M., Marsh M. and Wlezien C. ( 1994) Attitudes toward Europe and referendum votes: a response to Siune and Svensson. Electoral Studies13: 117-121.
28.
Gabel MJ ( 1998) Public support for European integration: an empirical test of five theories. Journal of Politics60: 333-354.
29.
Gabel MJ and Anderson CJ ( 2002) The structure of citizen attitudes and the European political space. Comparative Political Studies35(8): 893-913.
30.
Gabel MJ and Palmer H. ( 1995) Understanding variation in public support forEuropean integration. European Journal of Political Research27: 3-19.
31.
Garry J. and Tilley J.(2009) The macroeconomic factors conditioning the impact of identity on attitudes towards the EU. European Union Politics10(3): 361-379.
32.
Gross K. ( 2008) Framing persuasive appeals: Episodic and thematic framing, emotional response, and policy opinion. Political Psychology29(2): 169-192.
33.
Haesly R. ( 2001) Euroskeptics, europhiles and instrumental Europeans: European attachment in Scotland and Wales. European Union Politics2(1): 81-102.
34.
Hellstrom J. ( 2008) Who leads, who follows? Re-examining the party-electorate linkages onEuropean integration. Journal of European Public Policy15(8): 1127-1144.
35.
Hewstone M. ( 1986) Understanding Attitudes towards the European Community . New York: Cambridge University Press.
36.
Hix S. ( 2008) What’s Wrong with the European Union and How to Fix It. Cambridge: Polity Press .
37.
Hobolt SB ( 2009) Europe in Question: Referendums on European Integration . Oxford: Oxford University Press .
38.
Hobolt SB and Brouard S. ( 2010) Contesting the European Union? Why the Dutch and the French rejected the EU Constitution. Political Research Quarterly, first published online, 1 March 2010.
39.
Hooghe L. and Marks G. ( 2004) Does identity or economic rationality drive public opinion on European integration? PS, Political Science and Politics37(3): 415-420.
40.
Hooghe L. and Marks G. ( 2005) Calculation, community and cues: Public opinion onEuropean integration. European Union Politics6(4): 419-444.
41.
Hooghe L. and Marks G. ( 2007) Sources of euroskepticism. Acta Politica42: 119-127.
42.
Hooghe L. and Marks G. ( 2008) A postfunctional theory of European integration: from permissive consensus to constraining dissensus. British Journal of Political Science39: 1-23.
43.
Huddy L., Feldman S. and Cassese E. ( 2007) On the distinct political effects of anxiety and anger . In: Neuman W, Marcus G, Crigler A and MacKuen M (eds) The Affect Effect: Dynamics of Emotion in Political Thinking and Behavior. Chicago : University of Chicago Press, 202-230.
Inglehart R. ( 1971) Public opinion and European integration. In: Lindberg L and Scheingold S (eds) European Integration. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 160-191.
46.
Inglehart R. ( 1990) Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Societies . Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
47.
Inglehart R. and Reif K. ( 1991) Analyzing trends in West European opinion: the role of the Eurobarometer surveys. In: Reif K and Inglehart R (eds) Eurobarometer: The Dynamics of European Public Opinion. London: Macmillan, 1-26.
48.
Izard C. ( 1977) Human Emotions. New York: Plenum Press.
49.
Karp JA and Bowler S. ( 2006) Broadening and deepening or broadening versus deepening: the question of enlargement and Europe’s ‘hesitant Europeans’ . European Journal of Political Research45(3): 369-390.
50.
Keltner D., Ellsworth PC and Edwards K. ( 1993) Beyond simple pessimism: Effects of sadness and anger on social perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology64: 740-752.
51.
Kritzinger S. ( 2003) The influence of the nation-state on individual support for theEuropean Union. European Union Politics4(2): 219-241.
52.
Krouwel A. and Abts K. ( 2007) Varieties of Euroscepticism and populist mobilization: Transforming attitudes from mild Euroscepticism to harsh Eurocynicism. Acta Politica42(2-3): 252-270.
53.
Lazarus R. ( 1991) Emotion and Adaptation. New York: Oxford University Press.
54.
Lerner J. and Keltner D. ( 2001) Fear, anger, and risk. Journal of Social Psychology81(1): 146-159.
55.
Lindberg LN and Scheingold SA ( 1970) Europe’s Would-be Polity: Patterns of Change in the European Community. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
56.
Linde J. and Ekman J. ( 2003) Satisfaction with democracy: a note on a frequently used indicator in comparative politics. European Journal of Political Research42: 391-408.
57.
Lubbers M. ( 2008) Regarding the Dutch ‘nee’ to the European constitution: a test of the identity, utilitarian and political approaches to voting ‘no’. European Union Politics9(1): 59-86.
58.
Lubbers M. and Scheepers P. ( 2005) Political versus instrumental Euro-scepticism: Mapping scepticism in European countries and regions. European Union Politics6(2): 223-242.
59.
Lubbers M. and Scheepers P.(2010) Divergent trends of euroscepticism in countries and regions of theEuropean Union. European Journal of Political Research49(6): 787-817.
60.
Luedtke A. ( 2005) European integration, public opinion and immigration policy: Testing the impact of national identity. European Union Politics6(1): 83-112.
61.
McLaren LM ( 2002) Public support for the European Union: Cost/benefit analysis or perceived cultural threat? Journal of Politics64: 551-566.
McLaren LM ( 2007b) Explaining opposition to Turkish membership of the EU . European Union Politics8(2): 251-278.
64.
Marks G. and Hooghe L. ( 2003) National identity and support for European integration . Working paper, Wissenschaftszentrum fur SozialforschungBerlin.
65.
Moravcsik A. ( 1991) Negotiating the Single European Act: National interests and conventional statecraft in theEuropean Community. International Organization45(1): 19-56.
66.
Nabi R. ( 1999) A cognitive-functional model for the effects of discrete negative emotions on information processing, attitude change, and recall. Communication Theory9(3): 292-320.
67.
Nelsen BF and Guth JL ( 2000) Exploring the gender gap: Women, men and public attitudes towardEuropean integration. European Union Politics1(3): 267-291.
68.
Neuman W., Marcus G., Crigler A. and MacKuen M. ( 2007) The Affect Effect: Dynamics of Emotion in Political Thinking and Behavior. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
69.
Niedermayer O. and Westle B. ( 1995) A typology of orientations. In: Niedermayer O and Sinnott R (eds) Public Opinion and Internationalized Governance . Oxford : Oxford University Press , 33-50.
70.
Norris P. ( 1999) The political regime. In: Schmitt H and Thomassen J (eds) Political Representation and Legitimacy in the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 74-90.
71.
Pettigrew T. ( 1997) The affective component of prejudice: Empirical support for the new view. In: Tuch SA and Martin JK (eds) Racial Attitudes in the 1990s: Continuity and Change. Westport, CT: Praeger, 76-92.
72.
Ray L. ( 2003) Reconsidering the link between incumbent support and pro-EU opinion. European Union Politics4(3): 259-279.
73.
Rohrschneider R. ( 2002) The democracy deficit and mass support for an EU-wide government. American Journal of Political Science46(2): 463-475.
74.
Sánchez-Cuenca I. ( 2000) The political basis for support for European integration . European Union Politics1(2): 147-172.
75.
Scharpf F. ( 1999) Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic?Oxford: Oxford University Press .
76.
Schoen H. ( 2008) Turkey’s bid for EU membership, contrasting views of public opinion, and vote choice. Evidence from the 2005 German federal election. Electoral Studies27(2): 344-355.
77.
Schuck ART and De Vreese CH ( 2006) Between risk and opportunity: News framing and its effects on public support for EU enlargement. European Journal of Communication21(1): 5-32.
78.
Schuck ART and De Vreese CH ( 2008) The Dutch no to the EU constitution: Assessing the role of EU skepticism and the campaign. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties18(1): 101-128.
79.
Semetko HA, Van der Brug W. and Valkenburg PM ( 2003) The influence of political events on attitudes towards theEuropean Union. British Journal of Political Science33(4): 621-634.
80.
Svensson P. ( 2002) Five Danish referendums on the European Community and European Union: a critical assessment of the Franklin thesis. European Journal of Political Research41(6): 733-750.
81.
Tajfel H. ( 1978) Differentiation between Social Groups: Studies in the Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations. London : Academic Press.
82.
Thomassen J. ( 2009) The Legitimacy of the European Union after Enlargement . Oxford: Oxford University Press .
83.
Van der Eijk C. and Franklin M. ( 2004) Potential for contestation on European matters at national elections in Europe. In: Marks G and Steenbergen MR (eds) European integration and political conflict. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 32-50.
84.
Weßels B. ( 2007) Discontent and European identity: Three types of Euroscepticism . Acta Politica42(2-3): 287-306.
85.
Zaller J. ( 1992) The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
