Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

We use surveys of British businesses to test the relative influence of monetary and ‘real’ economic factors on private sector interests towards European monetary integration. We show that firms trading with the European Union have a preference for a fixed exchange rate (in both the European Monetary System and euro membership). On the other hand, firms not trading with the rest of the EU do not hold such preferences. In addition, firms with parent companies in other EU member states favour euro membership. However, contrary to conventional theories of political economy, firms trading more widely (that is, extra-European trade) also prefer euro membership, despite being less dependent on intra-EU trade. Moreover, in later surveys, exporting firms appear to prefer a strong pound, contrary to received wisdom.

Keywords

British business Economic and Monetary Union euro European Monetary System exchange rates preferences

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alt J. , Carlsen F. , Heum P. and Johansen K. ( 1999) Asset specificity and the political behavior of firms: Lobbying for subsidies in Norway. International Organization 53(1): 99-116.

BCC [British Chambers of Commerce] (2003) BCC’s single currency survey. London, January.

Bernhard W. and Leblang D. ( 1999) Democratic institutions and exchange-rate commitments . International Organization 53(1): 71-97.

Bolten A. ( 2007) Knowing the value of the dollar: Patterns of exchange rate politicization in Brazil. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Studies Association, 28 February - 3 March, Chicago.

Duckenfield M. ( 1999) Don’t let the numbers fool you: Uncertainty in asset specificity and the political behavior of firms. Unpublished paper, Harvard University, Center for European Studies.

Frieden J. ( 1997) Economic liberalization and the politics of European monetary integration. In: Kahler M (ed.) Liberalization and Foreign Policy. New York: Columbia University Press, 237-268.

Frieden J. ( 1998) The political economy of European exchange rates: An empirical assessment. Mimeo, Harvard University.

Frieden J. ( 2002) Real sources of European currency policy: Sectoral interests and European monetary integration. International Organization 56(4): 831-860.

Frieden J. and Rogowski R. ( 1996) The impact of the international economy on national policies: An analytical overview. In: Keohane R and Milner H (eds) Internationalization and Domestic Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 25-47.

10.

FSB [Federation of Small Businesses] (1998 ) Members’ survey on EMU. London, March.

11.

Hirschman AO ( 1970) Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

12.

Keohane R. and Axelrod R. ( 1985) Achieving cooperation under anarchy: Strategies and institutions . World Politics 38(1): 226-254.

13.

King G. , Keohane R. and Verba S. ( 1994) Designing Social Enquiry. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

14.

Knight SC ( 2007) A survey of preferences and political activity on exchange rate policy. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Studies Association, 28 February - 3 March, Chicago.

15.

Lieberman E. ( 2005) Nested analysis as a mixed-method strategy for comparative research. American Political Science Review 99(3): 435-452.

16.

Ludlow P. ( 1982) The Making of the European Monetary System. London: Butterworth.

17.

McNamara K. ( 1998) The Currency of Ideas: Monetary Politics in the European Union. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

18.

Magee S. ( 1978) Three simple tests of the Stolper-Samuelson theorem. In: Oppenheimer P (ed.) Issues in International Economics. London: Oriel Press, 138-153.

19.

Mancini GF ( 2000) The Italians in Europe. Foreign Affairs 79(2): 122-134.

20.

Moravcsik A. ( 1997) Taking preferences seriously: A liberal theory of international politics. International Organization 51(4): 513-553.

21.

Moravcsik A. ( 1998) The Choice for Europe. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

22.

MORI (1998) Business attitudes to the single currency. London, September.

23.

Oatley T. ( 1997) Monetary Politics: Exchange Rate Cooperation in the European Union. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

24.

Quaglia L. ( 2002) Italy and economic and monetary union: Domestic politics and EU policy-making. Unpublished DPhil thesis, University of Sussex, Sussex.

25.

Simmons B. ( 1994) Who Adjusts? Domestic Sources of Foreign Economic Policy during the Interwar Years. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

26.

Walsh J. ( 2001) National preferences and international institutions: Evidence from European monetary integration. International Studies Quarterly 45(1): 59-80.

27.

Walter S. ( 2008) A new approach for determining exchange-rate level preferences . International Organization 62(3): 405-438.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.25 MB

0.00 MB