This article analyses the effect of conflict in the Council of the European Union (EU) on delays in the transposition of EU directives. Based on enforcement and management theories, we predict that conflict in the Council speeds up the transposition process. In addition, we control for the instigation of infringement procedures by the Commission and expect a weaker effect of conflict in cases where the Commission disagrees with a directive and if directives grant more discretion to member states. These hypotheses are tested using two indicators of conflict: heterogeneity and polarization. Cox regression analysis is applied with time-dependent effects and with a shared frailty to control for the multilevel structure of the data. The analyses show that, over time, conflict has an increasing negative effect on delays.
Börzel, Tanja A. (2001) `Non-Compliance in the European Union: Pathology or Statistical Artefact', Journal of European Public Policy8: 803-24.
2.
Börzel, Tanja A., Tobias Hofmann and Diana Panke (2005) `Who's Afraid of the ECJ? Member States, Court Referrals and (Non)-Compliance', paper delivered to the 2005 ECPR Joint Sessions.
3.
Box-Steffensmeier, Janet and Christopher Zorn (2001) `Duration Models and Proportional Hazards in Political Science', American Journal of Political Science45: 972-88.
4.
Chayes, Abram and Antonia Chayes (1993) `On Compliance', International Organization47: 175-205.
5.
Cini, Michelle (ed.) (2003) European Union Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6.
Cleves, Mario, William Gould and Roberto Gutierrez (2002) An Introduction to Survival Analysis Using Stata. College Station, TX: Stata Corporation.
7.
Duina, Francesco G. (1997) `Explaining Legal Implementation in the European Union', International Journal of the Sociology of Law25(2): 155-79.
8.
Elgström, Ole and Christer Jönsson (2000) `Negotiation in the European Union: Bargaining or Problem-Solving?', Journal of European Public Policy7(5): 684-704.
9.
Esteban, Joan and Debraj Ray (1994) `On the Measurement of Polarization', Econometrica62: 819-51.
10.
Falkner, Gerda, Miriam Hartlapp, Simone Leiber and Oliver Treib (2004) `Non-Compliance with EU Directives in the Member States: Opposition through the Backdoor?', Western European Politics27(3): 452-73.
11.
Falkner, Gerda, Miriam Hartlapp, Simone Leiber and Oliver Treib (2005) Complying with Europe: EU Harmonization and Soft Law in the Member States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12.
Ferejohn, John A. and Barry R. Weingast (1992) `A Positive Theory of Statutory Interpretation', International Review of Law and Economics12(2): 263-79.
13.
Franchino, Fabio (2004) `Delegating Powers in theEuropean Community', Journal of Theoretical Politics12: 155-81.
14.
Franchino, Fabio (2007) The Powers of the Union: Delegation in the EU. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15.
From, Johan and Per, Stava (1993) `Implementation of Community Law: The Last Stronghold of National Control', in Svein S. Andersen and Kjell A. Eliassen (eds) Making Policy in Europe: The Europeification of National Policy-Making , pp. 55-67. London: Sage.
16.
Golub, Jonathan (2007) `Survival Analysis and European Union Decision-Making' , European Union Politics8: 155-79.
17.
Golub, Jonathan and Bernard Steunenberg (2007) `How Time Affects EU Decision-Making' , European Union Politics8: 555-66.
18.
Haverland, Marcus and Marleen Romeijn (2007) `Do Member States Make European Policies Work? Analysing the EU Transposition Deficit', Public Administration85: 757-78.
19.
Héritier, Adrienne (1996) `The Accommodation of Diversity in European Policy-Making and Its Outcomes: Regulatory Policy as a Patchwork', Journal of European Public Policy3: 149-67.
20.
Héritier, Adrienne, Christoph Knill and Susanne Mingers (1996) Ringing the Changes in Europe. Regulatory Competition and the Redefinition of the State. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter .
21.
Hill, Michael and Peter Hupe (2002) Implementing Public Policy: Governance in Theory and in Practice. London: Sage.
22.
Jensen, Christian (2007) `Implementing Europe: A Question of Oversight' , European Union Politics8: 451-77.
23.
Kaeding, Michael (2006) `Determinants of Transposition Delay in theEuropean Union', Journal of Public Policy26: 229-53.
24.
Kaeding, Michael (2008) `Lost in Translation or Full Stream Ahead: The Transposition of EU Transport Directives across Member States', European Union Politics9: 115-43.
25.
Knill, Christoph (2001) The Europeanisation of National Administrations. Patterns of Institutional Change and Persistence. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
26.
König, Thomas (2001) `Principal, Agents and the Process of European Legislation', paper delivered to the 2001 ECPR Joint Sessions.
27.
König, Thomas (2008) `Analysing the Process of EU Legislative Decision-making: To Make a Long Story Short. . .', European Union Politics9: 145-65.
28.
König, Thomas, Brooke Luetgert and Lars Mäder (2005) `Troubles with Timeliness: Explaining Trends in Transposition Delay', paper delivered to the 2005 ECPR Joint Sessions.
29.
Lowi, Theodore (1964) `American Business, Public Policy, Case Studies and Political Theory', World Politics16: 677-715.
30.
McCubbins, Mathew D., Roger G. Noll and Barry R. Weingast (1987) `Administrative Procedures as Instruments of Political Control', Journal of Law, Economics & Organization3: 243-77.
31.
McCubbins, Mathew D., Roger G. Noll and Barry R. Weingast (1989) `Structure and Process as Solution to the Politician's Principal Agent Problem', Virginia Law Review75: 431-82.
32.
Majone, Giandomenico (2001) `Two Logics of Delegation. Agency and Fiduciary Relations in EU Governance', European Union Politics2: 103-22.
33.
Mastenbroek, Ellen (2003) `Surviving the Deadline: The Transposition of EU Directives in the Netherlands', European Union Politics4(4): 371-95.
34.
Mastenbroek, Ellen (2007) `The Politics of Compliance: Explaining the Transposition of EC Directives in the Netherlands'. Dissertation, Leiden University.
35.
Mbaye, Heather A.D. (2001) `Why National States Comply with Supranational Law: Explaining Implementation Infringements in the European Union, 1972-1993' , European Union Politics2: 259-81.
36.
Mendrinou, Maria (1996) `Non-Compliance and the European Commission's Role in Integration', Journal of European Public Policy3: 1-22.
37.
Pollack, Mark (2003) The Engines of European Integration: Delegation, Agency, and Agenda Setting in the EU. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
38.
Pressman, Jeffrey L. and Aaron Wildavsky (1973) Implementation. How Great Expectations in Washington Are Dashed in Oakland. Berkeley : University of California Press.
39.
Shapley, Lloyd S. and Martin Shubik (1954) `A Method for Evaluating the Distribution of Power in a Committee System', American Political Science Review48(3): 787-92.
40.
Steunenberg, Bernard (2006) `Turning Swift Policy-making into Deadlock and Delay: National Policy Coordination and the Transposition of EU Directives' , European Union Politics7(3): 293-319.
41.
Tallberg, Jonas (2003) `Paths to Compliance: Enforcement, Management, and the European Union', International Organization56: 609-43.
42.
Tallberg, Jonas and Christer Jönsson (2001) `Compliance Bargaining in the European Union', paper presented at the European Community Studies Association.
43.
Thomson, Robert and Frans N. Stokman (2003) Decision Making in the European Union [machine readable data set]. Groningen: ICS.
44.
Thomson, Robert and René Torenvlied (2007) `Information, Commitment, and Consensus: A Comparison of Three Perspectives on Delegation in the European Union', paper delivered to the 2007 ECPR General Conference.
45.
Thomson, Robert, Frans N. Stokman, Christopher Achen and Thomas König (eds) (2006) The European Union Decides. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
46.
Thomson, Robert, René Torenvlied and Javier Arrequi (2007) `The Paradox of Compliance: Infringements and Delays in Transposing European Union Directives', British Journal of Political Science37: 685-709.
47.
Torenvlied, René (2000) Political Decisions and Agency Performance. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
48.
Wienke, Andreas (2003) `Frailty Models', MPIDR Working Paper WP-2003-032, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Germany.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
