Using Bulgaria as a case study, this article investigates what has limited the impact of the European Union (EU) on minority rights in accession countries. It is possible to identify a number of factors. They include a lack of internal minority rights standards, an emphasis on the acquis communautaire, missing expertise on minority issues, the superficial monitoring of candidate states, a lack of concern for human rights, and a failure in addressing public attitudes towards minorities. The case of Bulgaria differed from that of its neighbors in lacking involvement of the High Commissioner on National Minorities (HCNM) of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE).
Peter Vermeersch , “Minority Policy in Central Europe: Exploring the Impact of the EU's Enlargement Strategy.” Global Review of Ethnopolitics3 (2004 ): 3-19.
2.
Milada Anna Vachudova, “The Leverage of International Institutions on Democratizing States: Eastern Europe and the European Union,” European University Institute , Working Paper, RSC no. 2001/33 (2001): 34.
3.
Vachudova, “The Leverage of International Institutions,” 11.
4.
Helen M. Morris, “President, Party and Nationality Policy in Latvia, 1991-1999,” Europe-Asia Studies56 (2004): 543-69.
5.
Frank Schimmelfennig, Stefan Engert, and Heiko Knobel, “ The Conditions of Conditionality: The Impact of the EU on Democracy and Human Rights in European Non-Member States” (paper prepared for workshop 4, “Enlargement and European Governance ,” ECPR Joint Session of Workshops, Turin, Italy, 22-27 March 2002).
6.
James Hughes, Gwendolyn Sasse, and Claire Gordon, Europeanization and Regionalization in the EU's Enlargement to Central and Eastern Europe: The Myth of Conditionality (Houndmills , UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004), 8.
7.
Open Society Institute, An Assessment of Selected Policies in Candidate States, vol. 1 of Open Society Institute, Monitoring the EU Accession Process: Minority Protection (Budapest , Hungary: Open Society Institute, 2002).
8.
Milada Anna Vachudova, Europe Undivided: Democracy, Leverage, and Integration after Communism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).
9.
European Union, Presidency Conclusions , Copenhagen EuropeanCouncil—21-22 June1993 (Brussels: European Union), 1.
10.
Vachudova, Europe Undivided.
11.
James Hughes and Gwendolyn Sasse , “Monitoring the Monitors: EU Enlargement Conditionality and Minority Protection in the CEECs,” Journal on Ethnopolitics and Minority Issues in Europe1 (2003): 14.
12.
European Commission, “ Council Directive 2000/43/EC of 29 June 2000 Implementing the Principle of Equal Treatment between Persons Irrespective of Racial or Ethnic Origin (“Race Equality Directive”),” Official JournalL180 (19/07/2000): 22-26.
13.
European Commission against Racism and Intolerance , ECRI General Policy Recommendation No. 2: Specialised Bodies to Combat Racism, Xenophobia, Antisemitism and Intolerance at National Level, Adopted on 13 June 1997 (Strasbourg, France: European Commission against Racism and Intolerance, Council of Europe, 1997).
14.
Interview with Claudia Lam, administrator, European Commission against Racism and Intolerance, Strasbourg, France, 10 May 2004.
15.
Gwendolyn Sasse , “Democracy Promotion in CEE: The Political Rights of National Minorities” (paper presented at the World Congress of the International Council for Central and East European Studies, Berlin, 25-30 July 2005), 13.
16.
European Union, “ Europe Agreement Establishing an Association between the European Communities and Their Member States, of the One Part, and the Republic of Bulgaria, of the Other Part,” Brussels: European Communities, Official JournalL 358 (31/12/1994).
17.
European Commission, 2004Regular Report on Bulgaria's Progress towards Accession, 6 October (Brussels: European Commission , 2004), 141.
18.
European Commission, CommissionOpinion on Bulgaria's Application for Membership of theEuropean Union ( Brussels: European Commission, 1997 ), 19.
19.
European Commission, Enlargement Strategy Paper: Report on Progress towards Accession by Each of the Candidate Countries (Brussels: European Commission , 2000).
20.
European Commission, Enlargement Briefing: EU Support for Roma Communities in Central and Eastern Europe (Brussels: European Commission, 1999), 3.
21.
European Commission, Commission Opinion, 18.
22.
European Commission, Enlargement Briefing , 3.
23.
European Commission, Commission Opinion, 18.
24.
European Commission, Commission Opinion, 18.
25.
European Commission, 1999 Accession Partnership with Bulgaria (Brussels: European Commission, 1999), 4.
26.
Republic of Bulgaria, Report Submitted by Bulgaria Pursuant to Article 25, Paragraph 1 of the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities, 9 April (Strasbourg , France: Council of Europe, 2003 ).
27.
Bulgarian Helsinki Committee, Human Rights in Bulgaria in 2004: Annual Report of the Bulgarian Helsinki Committee, March 2005 (Sofia, Bulgaria: Bulgarian Helsinki Committee, 2005).
28.
Bernd Rechel , “State Control of Minorities in Bulgaria ,” Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics23 (2007): 352-70; and Bernd Rechel, “ The `Bulgarian ethnic model'—reality or ideology?” Europe-Asia Studies59 (2007): 1201-15.
29.
Vachudova, “The Leverage of International Institutions,” 5-6.
30.
Hughes, Sasse, and Gordon, Europeanization and Regionalization, 1.
31.
Heather Grabbe, “ A Partnership for Accession? The Implications of EU Conditionality for the Central and East European Applicants,” Robert Schuman Centre Working Paper no. 12 (San Domenico di Fiesole , Italy: European University Institute, 1999).
32.
European Commission, Enlargement Strategy Paper, 31-32.
33.
Hughes, Sasse, and Gordon, Europeanization and Regionalization, 174.
34.
Ibid, 26.
35.
Ibid, 5-7, 26-27, 174.
36.
Ibid, 26.
37.
Wade Jacoby, The Enlargement of the European Union and NATO: Ordering from the Menu in Central Europe (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004), 16.
38.
Hughes, Sasse, and Gordon, Europeanization and Regionalization, 169.
39.
Ibid, 174.
40.
European Union, Treaty Establishing a Constitution for Europe, Signed in Rome on 29 October 2004 ( Luxembourg: European Union, 2004 ), 18.
41.
Melanie Ram, “ Democratization through European Integration: The Case of Minority Rights in the Czech Republic and Romania,” Studies in Comparative International Development38 (2003 ): 28-56, 47-48.
42.
Ram, “ Democratization through European Integration,” 48.
43.
Michael Johns, “` Do as I Say, Not as I Do': The European Union, Eastern Europe and Minority Rights,” East European Politics and Societies17 (2003): 693-94.
44.
Philip Alston and J.H.H. Weiler, “An `Ever Closer Union' in Need of a Human Rights Policy: The European Union and Human Rights ,” in The EU and Human Rights, ed. P. Alston (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999), 7.
45.
Hughes, Sasse, and Gordon, Europeanization and Regionalization, 166.
46.
Ned Burton , “Assessing the Accession Criteria” (report from workshop 1, “Political Dimensions of the Accession Criteria ,” Birmingham, UK, European Research Institute, 30 November 2002.), 4.
47.
Hughes, Europeanization and Regionalization, 24.
48.
Ibid, 25.
49.
“Uniting the Balkans: Interview with Dimitris Kourkoulas ,” Sofia Echo, 17 April 2003.
50.
Will Guy , “`No Soft Touch': Romani Migration to the U.K. at the Turn of the Twenty-First Century,” Nationalities Papers31 (2003): 63-79.
51.
Guy, “`No Soft Touch,'” 73; and Dimitrina Petrova, “TheRoma: Between a Myth and the Future,” Social Research70 (2003): 149.
52.
Ram, “ Democratization through European Integration,” 52.
53.
European Commission, 1999Regular Report on Bulgaria's Progress towards Accession (Brussels: European Commission, 1999), 74.
54.
European Commission, 1999Regular Report, 74.
55.
Interview with Morten Jung-Olsen, former head of unit of the Bulgaria Team in the European Commission, Brussels, 14 June 2005.
56.
European Commission, 1999Composite Paper (Brussels: European Commission, 1999), 16.
57.
Claus Neukirch , Katrin Simhandl, and Wolfgang Zellner, “Implementing Minority Rights in the Framework of the CSCE/OSCE,” in Mechanisms for the Implementation of Minority Rights, ed. Council of Europe Publishing (Strasbourg , France: Council of Europe, 2004 ), 169; and Marcin Czaplinski, senior adviser to the OSCE HCNM, personal communication, April 2005 .
58.
Kyriaki Topidi, “ European Union Standards and Mechanisms for the Protection of Minorities and the Prevention of Discrimination,” in Council of Europe Publishing, Mechanisms, 198-99.
59.
United Nations Development Programme, Avoiding the Dependency Trap: A Human Development Report on the Roma Minority in Central and Eastern Europe (New York: United Nations Development Programme, 2003), 9. PHARE is the Poland and Hungary: Assistance for Restructuring their Economies program.
60.
Petrova, “The Roma ,” 148.
61.
European Commission, 2004Regular Report, 27, 140.
62.
Mita Castle-Kanerova , “Round and Round the Roundabout: Czech Roma and the Vicious Circle of Asylum-Seeking.” Nationalities Papers31 (2003): 17.
63.
Ram, “Democratization through European Integration,” 52.
64.
Hughes and Sasse, “Monitoring the Monitors,” 28.
65.
Alston and Weiler, “An `Ever Closer Union,'” 7.
66.
Burton, “Assessing the Accession Criteria,” 9.
67.
Vachudova, “The Leverage of International Institutions,” 11.
68.
Heather Grabbe, “ Europeanization Goes East: Power and Uncertainty in the EU Accession Process ,” http://www.cer.org.uk/pdf/grabbe_ECPR.pdf (accessed 21 November 2007).
69.
Manfred Nowak, “ Human Rights `Conditionality' in Relation to Entry to, and Full Participation in, the EU,” in Alston, The EU and Human Rights, 689-90, 691.
70.
Hughes and Sasse, “Monitoring the Monitors,” 16.
71.
European Commission, 1999Regular Report, 74.
72.
European Commission, 2000Regular Report on Bulgaria's Progress towards Accession (Brussels: European Commission, 2000), 21.
73.
Open Society Institute, Monitoring the EU Accession Process, 112.
74.
European Commission, 2000Regular Report, 22.
75.
Ibid.
76.
Ibid.
77.
European Commission, 2001Regular Report on Bulgaria's Progress towards Accession. (Brussels: European Commission, 2001), 23.
78.
European Commission, 2001Regular Report, 25.
79.
European Commission, 2002Regular Report, 132.
80.
European Commission, 1998Regular Report on Bulgaria's Progress towards Accession (Brussels: European Commission, 1998), 11.
81.
European Commission, 2003Regular Report, 21.
82.
European Commission, Commission Opinion, 18.
83.
European Commission, 2004Regular Report, 26.
84.
Hughes and Sasse, “Monitoring the Monitors,” 20.
85.
Ram, “ Democratization through European Integration,” 48.
86.
Burton, “Assessing the Accession Criteria,” 7, 9.
87.
Jeffrey T. Checkel , “Compliance and Conditionality,” ARENA Working Paper no. 18, 9 December 2000, http://www.arena.uio.no/publications/working-papers2000/papers/wp00_18.htm (accessed 21 November 2007).
88.
Ram, “ Democratization through European Integration,” 51.
