In any full-grown democracy, parties must confront voters with real choices that matter. The European Union is often said to be devoid of these choices owing to minor policy differences between parties. The manifestos issued at European Parliament elections by party groups are often perceived as being bland and indistinguishable from each other. How correct is this perception? In this article, the diversity of policy positions within and between the main European party groups is analyzed by means of the European election manifestos of 1999. The content analysis of these manifestos shows that there are significant differences both within and between the party groups. These differences indicate that these groups are (potentially) able to present meaningful choices to voters.
Alexa, Melina
and Cornelia Zuell (2000) A Review of Software for Text Analysis. Mannheim: ZUMA Nachrichten, Spezial Band 5.
2.
Attiná, Fulvio
(1990) `The Voting Behaviour of the European Parliament Members and the Problem of the Europarties', European Journal of Political Research18: 557-579.
3.
Bardi, Luciano
(1994) `Transnational Party Federations, European Parliamentary Party Groups, and the Building of Europarties', in Richard S. Katz and Peter Mair (eds) How Parties Organize: Change and Adaptation in Party Organizations in Western Democracies, pp. 357-372. London: Sage.
4.
Budge, Ian
(2000) `Expert Opinions of Party Policy Positions: Uses and Limitations in Political Research', European Journal of Political Research37: 103-113.
5.
Budge, Ian
and Richard Hofferbert (1996) `Comparative Textual Analyses of Government and Party Activity: The Work of the Manifesto Research Group', in Louis M. Imbeau and R.D. McKinley (eds) Comparing Government Activity, pp. 82-100. London/New York: Macmillan.
6.
Budge, Ian
, David Robertson and Derek Hearl (1987) Ideology, Strategy and Party Change: Spatial Analyses of Post-War Election Programmes in 19 Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7.
Budge
, Ian, Hans-Dieter Klingemann, Andrea Volkens, Judith Bara and Eric Tanenbaum (2001) Mapping Policy Preferences: Parties, Electors, and Governments, 1945-1998. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8.
Carrubba, Clifford and Matthew Gabel (1999) `Roll-Call Votes and Party Discipline in the European Parliament: Reconsidering MEP Voting Behaviour', European Parliament Research Group Working Paper No. 2-99. URL (consulted July 2001): http://www.lse.ac.uk/Depts/eprg/.
9.
Castles, Francis G.
and Peter Mair (1984) `Left-Right Political Scales: Some Expert Judgements', European Journal of Political Science12: 73-88.
10.
Gallagher
, Michael, Michael Laver and Peter Mair (2001) Representative Government in Modern Europe: Institutions, Parties, and Governments, 3rd edn.New York: McGraw-Hill.
11.
Hix, Simon
(1999) `Dimensions and Alignments in European Union Politics: Cognitive Constraints and Partisan Responses', European Journal of Political Research35: 69-106.
12.
Hix, Simon
and Christopher Lord (1997) Political Parties in the European Union. New York: St. Martin's Press.
13.
Hix
, Simon, Tapio Raunio and Roger Scully (1999) `An Institutional Theory of Behaviour in the European Parliament', paper presented at the joint sessions of the ECPR, 26-31 March 1999, Mannheim.
14.
Irwin, Galen
(1995) `Second-Order or Third-Rate? Issues in the Campaign for the Elections for the European Parliament 1994', Electoral Studies14: 183-199.
15.
Kleinnijenhuis, Jan
and Paul Pennings (2001) `Measurement of Party Positions on the Basis of Party Programmes, Media Coverage and Voter Perceptions', in Michael Laver (ed.) Estimating the Policy Positions of Political Actors, pp. 162-182. London: Routledge.
16.
Kreppel, Amie
(2000) `Rules, Ideology and Coalition Formation in the European Parliament: Past, Present and Future', European Union Politics1: 340-362.
17.
Kreppel, Amie
and George Tsebelis (1999) `Coalition Formation in the European Parliament', Comparative Political Studies32: 933-966.
18.
Laver, Michael
(1997) `Government Formation in the European Parliament', Aussenwirtschaft52: 223-248.
19.
Laver, Michael
(ed.) (2001) Estimating the Policy Positions of Political Actors. London: Routledge.
20.
Laver, Michael
and Ian Budge (1992) Party Policy and Government Coalitions. London: Macmillan.
21.
Laver, Michael
and W. Ben Hunt (1992) Policy and Party Competition. London: Routledge.
22.
McDonald, Michael
and Silvia M. Mendes (2001) `The Policy Space of Party Manifestos', in Michael Laver (ed.) Estimating the Policy Positions of Political Actors, pp. 90-114. London: Routledge.
23.
Pennings
, Paul, Hans Keman and Jan Kleinnijenhuis (1999) Doing Research in Political Science: An Introduction to Comparative Methods and Statistics. London: Sage.
24.
Popping, Roel
(2000) Computer-assisted Text Analysis. London: Sage.
25.
Raunio, Tapio
(2000) `Second-Rate Parties? Towards a Better Understanding of the European Parliament's Party Groups', in Knut Heidar and Ruud Koole (eds) Parliamentary Party Groups in European Democracies: Political Parties Behind Closed Doors, pp. 231-247. London and New York: Routledge.
26.
Ray, Leonard
(1999) `Measuring Party Orientations towards European Integration: Results from an Expert Survey', European Journal of Political Research36: 283-306.
27.
Rüdig, Wolfgang
(1996) `Green Parties and the European Union', in John Gaffney (ed.) Political Parties and the European Union, pp. 254-272. London and New York: Routledge.
28.
Schmitt, Hermann
and Jacques Thomassen (eds) (1999) Political Representation and Legitimacy in the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
29.
Thomassen, Jacques
and Hermann Schmitt (1999) `Partisan Structures in the European Parliament', in Richard S. Katz and Bernhard Wessels (eds) The European Parliament, the National Parliaments, and European Integration, pp. 129-148. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
30.
Van der Eijk
, Cees and Mark N. Franklin (1995) Choosing Europe? The European Electorate and National Politics in the Face of Union. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
