This article addresses the question of whether European integration leads to convergence in the domestic policies of the member states of the European Union. Some recent studies claim that as a result of European integration the national policies of the member states are becoming more alike. The existence of various exemptions and `flexibility' arrangements in the revisions of the Treaty of Rome as well as problems with implementation seem to contradict this view. In this article we offer a model based on insights from game theory and analytical politics, which aims to explain the conditions under which convergence may occur and the limitations of this process at the legislative and implementation stages of European policy making.
Coss, Simon
(1999) `France Escapes Swift Action on Energy Law', European Voice, 8-14 April: 14.
2.
Crombez, Christopher
(1996) `Legislative Procedures in the European Community', British Journal of Political Science26: 199-228.
3.
De Búrca, Gráinne
(1999) `Differentiation within the `Core'?: The Case of the Internal Market'. Paper presented at the 1999 ECSA-USA Conference in Pittsburgh, 3-5 June.
4.
Ehlermann, Claus-Dieter
(1995) `Increased Differentiation or Stronger Uniformity?', EUI Working Paper RSC 95: 21, European University Institute.
5.
European Commission
(1998) `Update on the Single Market', URL (consulted 3 November 1998): http://europe.eu.int/comm/dg15/en/update/score/score3.htm
6.
Guiliani, Marco
(1996) `Italy', in Dietrich Rometsch and Wolfgang Wessels (eds) The European Union and Member States: Towards Institutional Fusion?, pp. 105-133. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
7.
Haverland, Markus
(1999) National Autonomy, European Integration, and the Politics of Packaging Waste.Amsterdam: Thela Thesis.
8.
Héritier, Adrienne
(1995) ` “Leaders” and “laggards” in European clean air policy', in Brigitte Unger and Frans van Waarden (eds) Convergence or Diversity: Internationalization and Economic Policy Response, pp. 278-306. Aldershot: Avebury.
9.
Héritier, Adrienne
(1996) `The Accommodation of Diversity in European Policy Making and its Outcomes: Regulatory Policy as a Patchwork', EUI Working Papers, 96: 2, European University Institute.
10.
Hix, Simon
(1998) `The Study of the European Union II: The “New Governance Agenda and its Rival” ', Journal of European Public Policy5(1): 38-65.
11.
Kelemen, R. Daniel
(1995) `Environmental Policy in the European Union: The Struggle between Court, Commission and Council', in Brigitte Unger and Frans van Waarden (eds) Convergence or Diversity: Internationalization and Economic Policy Response, pp. 306-333. Aldershot: Avebury.
12.
Knill, Christoph
and Dirk Lehmkuhl (1999) `How Europe Matters: Different Mechanisms of Europeanization', European Integration Online Papers (EIoP) 3(7), URL (consulted January 2000): http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/1999-007a.htm
13.
Knill, Christoph
and Andrea Lenschow (1998) `Coping with Europe: The Impact of British and German Administrations on the Implementation of EU Environmental Policy', Journal of European Public Policy5: 595-615.
14.
Louis, Jean-Victor
(1998) `The Rule of Law', in Martin Westlake (ed.) The European Union Beyond Amsterdam: New Concepts of European Integration, pp. 99-115. London and New York: Routledge.
15.
Mény, Yves
, Pierre Muller and Jean-Louis Quermonne (eds) (1996) Adjusting to Europe: The Impact of the European Union on National Institutions and Policies.London and New York: Routledge.
16.
Moser, Peter
(1997) `A Theory of the Conditional Influence of the European Parliament in the Cooperation Procedure', Public Choice91: 333-350.
17.
Mueller, Dennis C.
(1989) Public Choice II: A Revised Edition of Public Choice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18.
Olsen, Johan P.
(1997) `European Challenges to the Nation State', in Bernard Steunenberg and Frans van Vught (eds) Political Institutions and Public Policy: Perspectives on European Decision Making, pp. 157-188. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
19.
Rometsch, Dietrich
and Wolfgang Wessels (eds) (1996) The European Union and Member States: Towards Institutional Fusion?Manchester: Manchester University Press.
20.
Scharpf, Fritz W.
(1996) `Negative and Positive Integration in the Political Economy of European Welfare States', in Gary Marks, Fritz W. Scharpf, Philippe C. Schmitter and Wolfgang Streeck (eds) Governance in the European Union, pp. 15-39. London: Sage.
21.
Scott, Joanne
(1999) `Flexibility in the Implementation of EC Environmental Law'. Paper presented at the 1999 ECSA-USA Conference in Pittsburgh, 3-5 June.
22.
Steunenberg, Bernard
(1994) `Decision Making under Different Institutional Arrangements: Legislation by the European Community', Journal of Theoretical and Institutional Economics150: 642-669.
23.
Tsebelis, George
(1994) `The Power of the European Parliament as a Conditional Agenda Setter', American Political Science Review88: 128-142.
24.
Tsebelis, George
(1995) `Decision Making in Political Systems: Veto Players in Presidentialism, Parliamentarism, Multicameralism and Multipartism', British Journal of Political Science25: 289-325.
25.
Weiler, Joseph H.H.
(1994) `A Quiet Revolution: The European Court of Justice and its Interlocutors', Comparative Political Studies26: 510-534.
26.
Wessels, Wolfgang
(1996) `Institutions of the EU System: Models of Explanation' in Dietrich Rometsch and Wolfgang Wessels (eds) The European Union and Member States: Towards Institutional Fusion?, pp. 20-36. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
27.
Wessels, Wolfgang
and Dietrich Rometsch (1996) `Conclusion: European Union and National Institutions', in Dietrich Rometsch and Wolfgang Wessels (eds) The European Union and Member States: Towards Institutional Fusion?, pp. 328-365. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
