The world is experiencing a growing recognition of the role of social dialogue in the pursuit of inclusive sustainable economic development. However, the sidelining of non-governmental actors in South Africa’s local government-led development landscape has hampered this agenda. This alienating culture led to the establishment of local economic development agencies (LEDAs) as structures tasked with fostering a participatory approach to local economic development (LED) for an effective response to developmental challenges. This article explored the role of social dialogue in LED through a case study of one LEDA in South Africa. A qualitative approach was deployed by conducting semi-structured interviews with key gatekeepers in the LED space. The findings reveal that whereas social dialogue is embraced at the national level, there is minimal understanding and usage of social dialogue at the local government level. Nevertheless, social dialogue strategies (information sharing, consultation, negotiation, joint decision-making and problem-solving) are used by the LEDA and its various stakeholders. The article argues that there is a need to align the national social dialogue with the local social dialogue through LEDAs to strengthen institutional arrangements for LED.
BaccaroL. and PapadakisK.2009: The downside of participatory-deliberative public administration. Socio-Economic Review, 7(2), 245–76. doi: 10.1093/ser/mwn030.
2.
BevirM.2013: A theory of governance. GAIA Books, University of California.
3.
BondP.2000: Elite transition: From apartheid to neoliberalism in South Africa. Pluto Press.
4.
BridgfordJ. and CarlsK.2012: Social dialogue: A manual for trade union education. International Training Centre of the International Labour Organization.
5.
CanzanelliG.2010: Review of the state of the art on territorial economic development agencies. ILS LEDA Paper. ILS LEDA.
6.
CanzanelliG.2011: Evaluation of local and territorial development agencies for human development: The ILS LEDA case. ILS LEDA Paper 15. ILS LEDA.
7.
Cooperative Governance and Traditional, Affairs (COGTA)2014: Moving KZN Forward: District Development Agencies as Strategic Implementers of Economic Development Programmes and Initiatives. Pietermaritzburg: Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs.
8.
Department of Public Services and Administration (DPSA)2013: Batho Pele: A Handbook on Service Delivery. Pretoria: Department of Public Services and Administration.
9.
Di MegiloR.2014: Local economic development programme enterprises department. International Labour Organization.
10.
Economic Development Department (EDD)2015: National social dialogue and strategic framework, http://www.economic.gov.za/aboutus/programmes/developmentdialogue/social-dialogue, last accessed on 3February2015.
11.
FashoyiniT.2004: Tripartite cooperation, social dialogue and national development. International Labour Review, 143(4), 341–72.
12.
FrayA.2013: Toolkit for local economic development: The regional and local economic development initiative. University of KwaZulu-Natal Press.
13.
GarmontD.2013: Rethinking participatory development: From critique to better practice, http://carnegieendowment.org/2013/08/21/rethinking-participatory-development-from-critique-to-better-practice-pub-52860, last accessed on 4August2018.
14.
GasserM., SalzanoC., Di MegiloR. and Lazarte-HoyleA.2013: Local economic development in post-crises situations. International Labour Organization.
15.
GrindleM.2007: Going local. Princeton University Press.
16.
GunterA.2005: Integrated development plans and local economic development: The case of Mpumalanga Province, South Africa. Africa Insight, 34(4), 32–38.
17.
HuqP. A.2014: The limits of citizen participation in the urban local governance process in Bangladesh. International Journal of Public Administration, 37(7), 424–35.
18.
Industrial Development Corporation (IDC)2008a: Draft national LEDA guidelines. IDC Unpublished Internal Document.
19.
Industrial Development Corporation (IDC)2008b: Development agency concept. IDC Unpublished Internal Document.
20.
Industrial Development Corporation (IDC)2008c: Local economic development agencies. IDC Unpublished Internal Document.
21.
International Labour Organization (ILO)2003: Overview and learned lessons on local economic development, human development, and decent work. ILO.
22.
International Labour Organization (ILO)2014: Local economic development outlook 2014. ILO.
23.
International Labour Organization (ILO)2015: Social dialogue: Promoting sound governance, inclusive growth and sustainable development. ILO.
24.
IshikawaJ.2003: Key features of national social dialogue: A social dialogue resource book. ILO.
25.
KellerB. and NkadimengG.2005: Review of the national economic development and labour council. NEDLAC.
26.
KhambuleI.2018a: Imagining an institutionalised social dialogue in the local government-led development landscape. Forum for Development Studies, 45(1), 97–117.
27.
KhambuleI.2018b: The role of local economic development agencies in South Africa’s developmental state ambitions. Local Economy, 33(3), 287–306.
28.
KimE. M.2010: Limits of the authoritarian developmental state of South Korea. In EdighejiO., editor, Constructing a developmental state in South Africa. HSRC Press, 97–125.
29.
LawrenceF.2013: The role of local economic development agencies in the South African local economic development Landscape. Urban Forum, 24(4), 523–41.
30.
MansuriG. and RaoV. K.2013: Localizing development: Does participation work?The World Bank.
31.
MeyerD. F.2014: Local government’s role in the creation of an enabling developmental environment. Administratio Publica, 22(1), 24–46.
32.
Meyer-StamerJ.2006: The hexagon of local economic development and LED in South Africa. Mesopartner.
33.
MonkamN.2014: Local municipality productive efficiency and its determinants in South Africa. Development Southern Africa, 31(2), 275–98.
34.
National Economic Development and Labour, Council (NEDLAC)2010: Social dialogue: A catalyst for social and economic development. 15th Annual Report, 2009/2010. NEDLAC.
35.
NattrassN.2014: A South African variety of capitalism?New Political Economy, 19(1), 56–78.
36.
NelE. L. and RogersonC. M.2005: Local economic development in Southern Africa. Transaction Press.
37.
NeneO.2015: The role of local economic development agencies in supporting local innovation. A research report submitted to the Wits Business School, University of the Witwatersrand, in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Management in Innovation Studies. University of Witwatersrand.
38.
Nordic Consulting Group2011: Social dialogue in developing countries. Prepared for NORAD March 2011, NORAD Report 8/2011 Discussion.
39.
ObradovicD.2005: Civil society and the social dialogue in European governance. Yearbook of European Law, 24(1), 261–327.
40.
PattersonC.2008: Country report local economic development in South Africa. GTZ Strengthening Local Governance Programme, GTZ.
41.
PenderisS.2014: State–Society Relations in the ‘South African Developmental State’: Integrated Development Planning and public participation at the local level. Dissertation submitted to the School of Government, Faculty of Economics and Management Sciences at the University of the Western Cape in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Cape Town: University of Western Cape.
42.
PieterseM.2005: What do we mean when we talk about transformative constitutionalism?South African Public Law Journal, 20(1), 150–70.
43.
Public Service Commission (PSC)2009: State of the public service report 2009. Pretoria: Public Service Commission.
44.
RatnamV. and TomodaS.2005: Practical guide for strengthening social dialogue in public service reform. International Labour Organization.
45.
Republic of South Africa. (RSA)1998: National Development Act. Pretoria: Government Gazette.
46.
RohlferS.2012: Perspectives on social dialogue pacts in Spain: Social dialogue and other social partners. Management Revenue, 23(1), 49–65.
47.
SchmitterC.2002: Participation in governance arrangements: Is there any reason to expect it will achieve sustainable and innovative policies in a multilevel context? In GroteJ. and GbikpiB., editors, Participatory governance. Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
48.
SmithT.2007: Community participation and empowerment within the realm of local governance in South Africa: An assessment of current practice and possibilities for strengthening participatory local governance. Input paper for the DPLG review of the White Paper on Local Government. Isandla Institute.
49.
Statistics South Africa2017: Poverty trends in South Africa: An examination of obsolete poverty between 2006 and 2015. Statistics South Africa.
50.
The World Bank2005: Exploring partnerships between communities and local governments in community driven development: A framework. World Bank Social Development Department.
51.
TomlinsonR.2003: The local economic development mirage in South Africa. Geoforum, 34(1), 113–22.
52.
United Cities and Local, Government (UCLG)2013: Development Cooperation and Local Government. UCLG Policy Paper. Barcelona. United Cities and Local Government.
53.
Van EmpelC.2008: Social dialogue for urban employment: Changing concepts and practices. Habitat International, 32(2), 180–91.
54.
Van EmpelC. and WernaE.2010: Labour-oriented participation in municipalities: How decentralized social dialogue can benefit the urban economy and its sectors. International Labour Organization.
55.
Van EmpelC., UrbainaW. and de VillalobosE.2006: Formulating the National Local Economic Development Platform in Mozambique:International Labour Organisation.
56.
WernaE.2001: Shelter, employment and the informal city in the context of the present economic scene: Implications for participatory governance. Jorge Hardoy Honorable Mention Paper, published in Habitat International, 25(2), 209–27.
