The past decade has been one of the more turbulent in terms of the economic pressures felt by localities. Through three national-level surveys taken at five-year intervals over the previous decade, the authors examine changes in the use of economic development strategies employed by localities with populations more than 10 000. Despite reporting having moved away from a reliance on business incentives to a broader set of strategies, we find that after the recent recession, localities are relying on business incentives at their highest levels in 10 years. Moreover, the most recent survey results suggest that there are observable patterns among localities and their use of first-, second-, and third-wave strategies.
BlakelyE. J.BradshawT. K. (2002). Planning local economic development: Theory and practice (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5.
BlakelyE. J.LeighN. G. (2010). Planning local economic development: Theory and practice (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6.
BradshawT. K.BlakelyE. J. (1999). What are third-wave state economic development efforts? From incentives to industrial policy. Economic Development Quarterly, 13, 229-224.
7.
EisingerP. (1988). The rise of the entrepreneurial state. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press.
8.
ElkinsD. (1995). Testing competing explanations for the adoption of type II policies. Urban Affairs Review, 30, 809-839.
9.
FitzgeraldJ.LeighN. G. (2002). Economic revitalization: Cases and strategies for city and suburb. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10.
GossE.PhillipsJ. (1999). Do business tax incentives contribute to a divergence in economic growth?Economic Development Quarterly, 13, 214-228.
11.
HallJ. L. (2010). The distribution of federal economic development grant funds: A consideration of need and the urban/rural divide. Economic Development Quarterly, 24, 311-324.
12.
KovenS.LyonsT. (2010). Economic development: Strategies for state and local practice. Washington, DC: International City/County Management Association.
13.
MolotchH. (1976). The city as a growth machine: Toward a political economy of place. American Journal of Sociology, 82, 309-332.
14.
National Bureau of Economic Research. (2011). U.S. business cycle expansions and contractions. Cambridge, MA: Author.
15.
OlberdingJ. C. (2002). Diving into the “third waves” of regional governance and economic development strategies: A study of regional partnerships for economic development in U.S. metropolitan areas. Economic Development Quarterly, 16, 251-272.
16.
OrrM.WestD. (2002). Citizens’ views on urban revitalization: The case of Providence, Rhode Island. Urban Affairs Review, 37, 397-419.
17.
PorterM. (2000). Location, competition, and economic development: Local clusters in a global economy. Economic Development Quarterly, 14, 15-34.
18.
RubinH. (1988). Shoot anything that flies; claim anything that falls: Conversations with economic development practitioners. Economic Development Quarterly, 2, 236-251.
19.
VogelR.KeenW. (2010). Public higher education and New York state’s economy. Economic Development Quarterly, 24, 384-393.
20.
WassmerR.AndersonJ. (2001). Bidding for business: New evidence on the effect of locally offered economic development incentives in a metropolitan area. Economic Development Quarterly, 15, 132-148.
21.
WilliamsonT.ImbroscioD.AlperovitzG. (2003). Making a place for community: Local democracy in a global era. New York, NY: Routledge.
22.
WilsonJ. (1996). When work disappears. Political Science Quarterly, 111, 567-595.
23.
WolmanH.SpitzleyD. (1996). The politics of local economic development. Economic Development Quarterly, 10, 115-130.
24.
ZhengL.WarnerM. (2010). Business incentive use among U.S. local governments: A story of accountability and policy learning. Economic Development Quarterly, 24, 325-336.
