It is argued that the battle to restore the sovereignty of the Afghan state will be won or lost subnationally. Victory will be more likely if, following Ghani and Lockhart (2008), citizen security can be assured; if the rule of law can be upheld without fear or favour; if reasonably effective, merit-based and accountable leadership and administrative means for service delivery can be institutionalized; and if social policies can be implemented which cut across regions and ethnic groups. However, progress towards these ambitious ends and the introduction in its support of pragmatic, evidence-based policy to strengthen the existing deconcentrated system of subnational governance (SNG) are hampered by stakeholder conceptual confusion about SNG, questionable donor altruism and largely incommensurable and irreconcilable SNG policy paradigms. Success will depend on whether links can be forged between SNG pragmatic imperatives and political expediency and on perceptions of policy compatibility with democracy promotion.
Adam Smith International. 2014, December: Briefing note on SNG terminology. Mimeo, 5.
2.
Adam Smith International2015, January: Policy discussion paper: Subnational governance and state sovereignty. Mimeo, 12.
3.
Amnesty International. 2014, August: Left in the dark: Failures of accountability for civilian casualties caused by international military operations in Afghanistan. Peter Benson House, http://www.amnesty.org/en/library/asset/asa11/006/2014/en/c628b1a4-821f-4168-a583-ac4a6159986e/asa110062014en.pdf, last accessed on 24September2014.
4.
BeneC. and NeilandA. E.2006: From participation to governance. Institute for the Sustainable Development of Fisheries.
5.
BennettR.2014, 14September: Afghanistan: Urgent enquiry needed after new US airstrike increases civilian death toll. Afghanistan Times, 6.
6.
BluntP.1997: Prisoners of the paradigm: Process consultants and ‘clinical’ development practitioners. Public Administration and Development, 17, 341–49.
7.
BluntP.2009: The political economy of accountability in Timor Leste: Implications for public policy. Public Administration and Development, 29, 89–100.
8.
BluntP.2012: Toxic technical assistance in conditions of state fragility: Field notes from Iraq. Progress in Development Studies, 12, 337–52.
9.
BluntP.2014: Whose resources are they anyway? Community development agreements in the Mongolian mining sector. Progress in Development Studies, 14, 383–99.
10.
BluntP. and JonesM.1992: Managing organisations in Africa. Walter de Gruyter, 356 & xiv.
11.
BluntP. and LindrothH.2012: Development’s denial of social justice. International Journal of Public Administration, 35, 471–81.
12.
BluntP. and RondinelliD.1997: Reconceptualising governance. Management Development and Governance Division, UNDP, Discussion Paper Number 2.
13.
BluntP. and SainkhuuG.2015, in press: Serendipity and stealth, resistance and retribution: Policy development in the Mongolian mining sector. Progress in Development Studies, 15.
14.
BluntP. and TurnerM.2005: Decentralisation, democracy and development in a post-conflict state: Commune councils in Cambodia. Public Administration and Development, 25, 75–87.
15.
BluntP. and TurnerM.2007: Decentralisation, deconcentration and poverty reduction in the Asia Pacific. In CheemaS. and RondinelliD., editors, Decentralized governance: Emerging concepts and practices. Brookings Institution Press and the Ash Institute for Democratic Governance and Innovation, John F. K. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, 115–30.
16.
BluntP., TurnerM. and HertzJ.2011: The meaning of development assistance. Public Administration and Development, 31, 172–87.
17.
BluntP., TurnerM. and LindrothH.2012a: Patronage, service delivery and social justice in Indonesia. International Journal of Public Administration, 35, 214–20.
18.
BluntP., TurnerM. and HertzJ.2012b: Patronage’s progress in post-Soeharto Indonesia. Public Administration and Development, 32, 64–81.
19.
BluntP., TurnerM. and LindrothH.2013: Morton’s fork: ‘Democracy’ versus neopatrimonialism in developing countries. International Journal of Public Administration, 36, 45–62.
20.
ChangHa-Joon. 2002: Kicking away the ladder: Development strategy in historical perspective. Anthem Press.
21.
ChangHa-Joon. 2009: Bad samaritans. Bloomsbury Press.
22.
ChomskyN.2010: Hopes and prospects. Penguin.
23.
ChomskyN.2007, 1September: Year 501: World orders old and new, part I. Z Magazine, http://www.zcommunications.org/year-501-world-orders-old-and-new-part-i-bynoamchomsky, last accessed on 15June2011.
24.
DiamondL.1999: Developing democracy: Towards consolidation. Johns Hopkins University Press.
25.
GhaniA. and LockhartC.2008: Fixing failed states: A framework for rebuilding a fractured world. Oxford University Press.
26.
GhaniA., LockhartC. and CarnahanM.2006: Closing the sovereignty gap: An approach to state-building. Overseas Development Institute, Working Paper 253, http://www.odi.org/sites/odi.org.uk/files/odi-assets/publications-opinion-files/2482.pdf, last accessed on 16December2014.
27.
GiustozziA. and MangalS.2015, 7January: Violence, the Taliban and Afghanistan’s 2014 elections. United States Institute of Peace, http://www.usip.org/publications/violence-the-taliban-and-afghanistan-s-2014-elections, last accessed on 16January2015.
28.
Government of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan. 2014, December: Realising self-reliance: Commitments to reforms and renewed partnership. London Conference on Afghanistan: Mimeo, 24.
29.
Graham-HarrisonE.2014, 9July: Afghanistan’s war takes heavy civilian toll, says United Nations report. The Guardian, http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jul/09/afghanistan-war-civilian-toll-united-nations-report, last accessed on 3October2014.
30.
HardingL.2001, 17October: Taliban moderates offered future role: Powell backs call to Afghan pragmatists. The Guardian, http://www.theguardian.com/world/2001/oct/17/pakistan.afghanistan, last accessed on 16January2015.
31.
IDLG. 2014a: Procedures for the recruitment, selection, appointment, and removal of provincial governors. IDLG Policy Brief, 7.
32.
IDLG. 2014b: IDLG strategy, structure, and functions: Adjusting to conditions of environmental hostility and complexity. IDLG, Discussion Paper, 17.
33.
IDLG. 2014c, October: Enhancing IDLG’s contributions to national and sub-national governance: Rationale, strategic opportunities, and reform proposals. IDLG Strategic Review, Discussion Paper, 49.
34.
KaneS.2015, 12January: Talking with the Taliban: Should the constitution be a point of negotiation?Unites States Institute of Peace. http://www.usip.org/publications/talking-the-taliban-should-the-afghan-constitution-be-point-of-negotiation, last accessed on 16January2015.
35.
KuhnT. S.1970: Logic of discovery or psychology of research? In LakatosI. and MusgraveA., editors, Criticism and the growth of knowledge. Cambridge University Press, 1–23.
36.
ListerS.2007: Understanding state-building and local government in Afghanistan. London School of Economics, Crisis States Research Centre, Working Paper no. 14, http://www.lse.ac.uk/internationalDevelopment/research/crisisStates/download/wp/wpSeries2/wp142.pdf, last accessed on 28August2014.
37.
LoynD.2015: Taliban ‘Reject Offer of Afghan Government Posts’. BBC News Asia, http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-30737664, last accessed on 14January2015.
38.
MansuriG. and RaoV.2013: Localising development: Does participation work?World Bank.
39.
MukhopadhyayD.2009: Warlords as bureaucrats: The Afghan experience. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Carnegie Papers, Middle East Programme, Number 101, http://carnegieendowment.org/files/warlords_as_bureaucrats.pdf, last accessed on 27August2014.
40.
RashidAhmed. 2013, 28March: Afghanistan after the war: Is peace possible. New Republic, http://www.newrepublic.com/article/112680/afghanistan-after-war, last accessed on 8August2014.
41.
RoyA.2004a: An ordinary person’s guide to empire. Southend Press.
42.
RoyA.2004b, January: The new American century. The Nation, http://www.thenation.com/article/newamerican-century, last accessed on 28July2011.
43.
RoyA.2008, January26: Listening to grasshoppers-genocide, denial and celebration. Z Net website, http://www.zcommunications.org/listening-to-grasshoppers-genocide-denialand-celebration-by-arundhati-roy, last accessed on 5August2011.
44.
RoyA.2009, September28: What have we done to democracy?Z Net website, http://www.zcommunications.org/what-have-we-done-to-democracy-by-arundhati-roy, last accessed on 7August2011.
45.
RubinB.2002: The fragmentation of Afghanistan: State formation and collapse in the international system. Talk delivered to the Carnegie Council, 25June, 2002, http://www.carnegiecouncil.org/studio/multimedia/20020625/index.html, last accessed on 3August2014.
46.
RubinB.2007, January/February: Saving Afghanistan. Foreign Affairs, http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/62270/barnett-r-rubin/saving-afghanistan, last accessed on 16August2014.
47.
RubinB.2013. Afghanistan from the cold war through the war on terror. Oxford University Press.
48.
RubinB.2014, 2April: The election is the enemy. Foreign Policy, http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2014/04/02/afghanistan_elections_taliban_ghani_attacks, last accessed on 13August2014.
49.
SchouA. and HaugM.2005: Decentralisation in conflict and post-conflict situations. Norwegian Institute for Urban and Regional Research, Working Paper 139, http://www.nibr.no/filer/2005-139.pdf, last accessed on 31October2014.
50.
SuttonR.1999: The policy process: An overview. Overseas Development Institute, Mimeo, 35.
51.
The Asia Foundation. 2014: Afghanistan in 2014: A survey of the Afghan people. The Asia Foundation, 251, http://www.asiafoundation.org/publications/pdf/1425, last accessed on 9December2014.
52.
TomsenP.2014: The good war? What went wrong in Afghanistan and how to make it right. Foreign Affairs, 93, 47–54.
53.
Transparency International. 2014: Corruption perception index 2013, http://www.transparency.org/cpi2013/results, last accessed on 7August2014.
54.
TurnerM.2006: State consolidation and subnational governance in Afghanistan. Paper presented at international research symposium on public management 10 (IRSPMX), Glasgow Caledonian University, 10–12April.
55.
United Nations Assistance Mission in Afghanistan. 2014, December, 19: 2014 Sees highest civilian casualty figures recorded, http://unama.unmissions.org/Default.aspx?tabid=12254&ctl=Details&mid=15756&ItemID=38492&language=en-US, last accessed on 20December2014.
56.
World Bank. 2014: Critical administrative constraints to service delivery: Improving public services in Afghanistan’s transformational decade. World Bank, 133.
57.
World Bank Institute. 1999: Decentralisation briefing notes, http://siteresources.worldbank.org/WBI/Resources/wbi37142.pdf, last accessed on 18August1999.
