This article contributes to debates about ethical and methodological dilemmas experienced in international development studies. It departs from a research experience based on a longitudinal study, the Reality Check Approach, that puts intimacy, immersion and consensus at its core. These concepts signify an ethically motivated approach that aims to ‘give voice’ to people living in poverty. They also describe an ideal research relationship assumed as the basis for good quality data. The article examines the difficulties encountered when faced with ambiguous meanings in people’s responses, and shortcomings of the approach. These include the combining of ethical and instrumental motivations in the research framework and ambivalent roles and conflicting ethics, highlighted in the conflictual notions of ‘giving someone space to talk’ and ‘making someone talk’.
Action Aid International2006: ALPS. Accountability, learning and planning system.
2.
AtkinsonP.HammersleyM.1994: Ethnography and participant observation. In DenzinN.K.LincolnY.S., editors, Handbook of qualitative research. SAGE, 248–61.
3.
BirchM.MillerT.2000: Inviting intimacy: The interviews as therapeutic opportunity. International Journal of Social Research Methodology3, 189–202.
4.
BrinkmannS.KvaleS.2005: Confronting the ethics of qualitative research. Journal of Constructivist Psychology18, 157–81.
5.
BusierH.-L.ClarkK.A.RebeccaA.2010: Intimacy in research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, April, 165–70.
6.
ChambersR.2005: Ideas for development. Earthscan.
7.
CollinsDarylMorduchJonathanRutherfordStuartRuthvenOrlanda2009: Portfolios of the poor. Princeton University Press.
8.
CookB.KothariU., editors 2001: Participation: The new tyranny?Zed Books.
9.
CornerJ.WrightD.FosterC.GunaratnamY.HopkinsonJ.OkamotoI.2006: Listening to the views of people affected by cancer about cancer research. Macmillan Cancer Support.
10.
DavidM.2002: Problems of participation: The limits of action research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology5, 11–17.
11.
DaviesR.DartJ.2005: The ‘Most Significant Change’ (MSC) technique. A guide to its use. ISBN-10: 0955549809.
12.
de LaineMarlene2000: Fieldwork, participation and practice. Ethics and dilemmas in qualitative research. SAGE.
13.
Dickson-SwiftV.JamesE.L.KippenS.LiamputtongP.2006: Blurring boundaries in qualitative health research on sensitive topics. Qualitative Health Research16, 853–71.
14.
DonnellyJ.2007: Development ethics and moral engagement: Some political and ethical dilemmas in development research. In SmithM., editor, Negotiation boundaries and borders (Studies in Qualitative Methodology, Vol. 8). Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 107–29.
15.
DuncombeJ.JessopJ.2002: ‘Doing rapport’ and the ethics of ‘faking friendship’. In MauthnerM.BirchM.JessopJ.MillerT., editors, Ethics in qualitative research. SAGE, 107–22.
16.
Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC)2012: Framework for research ethics FRE: 2010, http://www.esrc.ac.uk/_images/Framework-for-Research-Ethics_tcm8-4586.pdf, last accessed in June 2012.
17.
GlesneC.1989: Rapport and friendship in ethnographic research. Qualitative Studies in Education21, 45–54.
18.
GreeneJ.1988: Stakeholder participation and utilization in program evaluation. Evaluation Review12, 91–116.
19.
GRM International2011: Reality Check Bangladesh 2010: Listening to poor people’s realities about primary health care and primary education (Year 4). Sida.
20.
HarringtonB.2002: Obtrusiveness as strategy in ethnographic research. Qualitative Sociology251, 49–61.
21.
HewittJeanette2007: Ethical components of researcher–researched relationships in qualitative interviewing. Journal of Qualitative Health Research18, 1149–59.
22.
HickeyS.MohanG., editors. 2004: Participation – From tyranny to transformation? Exploring new approaches to participation in development. Zed Books.
23.
HulmeDavid2004: Thinking small and the understanding of poverty: Maymana and Mofizul’s story. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities5, 161–76.
24.
JacksonCecile2012: Speech, gender and power: Beyond testimony. Paper presented at seminar at University of East Anglia.
25.
JensenH.J.2012: Emotions on the move: Mobile motions among train commuters in the south east of Denmark. Emotions, Space and Society5, 201–06. doi:10.1016/j.emospa.2011.07.002.
26.
Karnieli-MillerO.StrierR.PessachL.2009: Power relations in qualitative research. Qualitative health research192, 279–89.
27.
KleinmanSherrylCoppMartha A.1993: Emotions and fieldwork. Qualitative Research Methods Series No. 28, Sage University Paper.
28.
KnowlesC.2006: Handling your baggage in the field reflections on research relationships. International Journal of Social Research Methodology95, 393–404.
LudemaJ.D.CooperiderD.BarretF.J.2001: Appreciative inquiry: The power of the positive questions. In ReasonP.BradburgH., editors, Handbook of action research. SAGE.
32.
MauthnerM.BirchM.JessopJ.MillerT.2002: Ethics in qualitative research. SAGE.
33.
MellorM.2007: Researching for change. In SmithM., editor, Negotiating boundaries and borders (Studies in Qualitative Methodology, Vol. 8). Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 177–95.
34.
MizenPhilOfosu-KusiYaw2007: Researching with, not on: Using photography in researching street children in Accra, Ghana. In SmithM., editor, Negotiation boundaries and borders (Studies in Qualitative Methodology, Vol. 8). Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 57–81.
35.
NarayanDeepaPatelRajSchafftKaiRademacherAnneKoch-SchulteSarah1999: Can anyone hear us? Voices from 47 countries. World Bank.
36.
PittsM.J.Miller-DayJ.2007: Upward turning points and positive rapport-development across time in researcher – Participant relationships. Qualitative Research7, 177–201.
37.
SimpsonK.2007: Hearing voices? Negotiating multiple ethical commitments in development research. In SmithM., editor, Negotiating boundaries and borders (in Studies in Qualitative Methodology, Vol. 8). Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 155–73. doi:10.1016/S1042-3192(06)08008-6.
38.
ThompsonR.HollandJ.2003: Hindsight, foresight and insight: The challenges of longitudinal qualitative research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology3, 233–44.
39.
WatsonA.2012: I crashed the boat and wept: Localizing the ‘field’ in critical geographical practice. Emotion, Space and Society5, 192–200. doi:10.1016/j.emospa.2011.10.004.
40.
World Bank2008: Whispers to voices: Gender and social transformation in Bangladesh. Bangladesh Development Series, Paper No. 22, World Bank.
