Sen’s capability approach emphasizes the importance of freedom and choice in leading the life that one values. In the capability approach, a person converts the vector of commodities into functionings. This conversion depends upon personal, social and environmental factors. These conversion factors are important because they constrain the capability achievement of individuals, a matter that is especially important for the poor. Using the case of a credit cooperative in Malaysia, this article seeks to demonstrate the importance of conversion factors and how it is possible to improve the capabilities of the poor.
DeneulinS.2005: Development as freedom and the Costa Rican human development story. Oxford Development Studies33, 493–510.
2.
DenzauA.T.NorthD.C.1994: Shared mental models: Ideologies and institutions. Kyklos47, 3–31.
3.
GangI.N.SenK.YunM.2006: Caste, ethnicity and poverty in rural India. Working Paper Series No. 2006-34. University of Rutgers.
4.
GreifA.2006: Institutions and the path to the modern economy: Lessons from medieval trade. Cambridge University Press.
5.
HodgsonG.1993: Evolution and institutional change. In MakiU.GustafssonB.KnudsenC., editors, Rationality, institutions and economic methodology. Routledge, 222–41.
6.
HodgsonG.1998: The approach of institutional economics. Journal of Economic Literature36, 166–92.
7.
HodgsonG.2000: What is the essence of institutional economics?Journal of Economic Issues34, 317–29.
8.
HodgsonG.2006: What are institutions?Journal of Economic Issues40, 1–25.
9.
LancasterK.J.1966: A new approach to consumer theory. Journal of Political Economy74, 132–57.
10.
MantzavinosC.2001: Individuals, institutions, and markets. Cambridge University Press.
11.
NelsonR.R.WinterS.G.1982: An evolutionary theory of economic change. Harvard University Press.
12.
NorthD.C.1990: Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press.
13.
NussbaumM.C.2003: Capabilities as fundamental entitlements: Sen and social justice. Feminist Economics9, 33–59.
14.
RobeynsI.2000: An unworkable idea or a promising alternative? Sen’s capability approach re-examined. Discussion Paper, Center for Economic Studies, University of Leuven.
RobeynsI.2005: The capability approach: A theoretical survey. Journal of Human Development6, 93–114.
17.
SenA.K.1985: Commodities and capabilities. Oxford University Press.
18.
SenA.K.1992: Inequality re-examined (Expanded edition with a substantial annexures by James Foster and Amartya Sen). Clarendon Press.
19.
SenA.K.2000: Development as freedom. Oxford University Press.
20.
SinnappanP. undated: Women’s empowerment through micro-finance and micro-enterprises: The Malaysian experience. Unpublished paper.
21.
SiwarC.QuinonesB.2000: Microfinance in Malaysia: Aiming at success. In RemenyiJ.QuinonesB., Jr, editors), Microfinance and poverty alleviation – Case studies from Asia and the Pacific. Pinter, 180–199.
22.
SrinivasM.N.1962: Caste in modern India. Asia Publishing House.
23.
SubramaniamS.V.DuncanC.2000: Capability and contextuality. Working Paper Series, Vol. 10, No. 10, Harvard: Harvard Center for Population and Development Studies.
24.
TeschlM.DerobertL.2001: Capabilities, networks and activity. Paper prepared for the conference on Justice and Poverty: Examining Sen’s Capability Approach, von Hugel Institute, St. Edmund’s College, 5–7June.
