The application of the three-step coding of grounded theory is used to analyse the travel constraints and management strategies of 24 Korean interviewees aged 40 and over. These interviewees are categorized into travellers and non-travellers. Travellers include ‘constraint haves’ and ‘constraint have-nots’, while non-travellers are ‘constraint haves with travel desire’ or ‘constraint haves without travel desire’. Twenty-one participants had constraints, and 20 out of 21 chose not to travel any more, mainly owing to time and money factors.
ChickG.DongE. (2004), ‘Possibility of refining the hierarchical model of leisure constraints through cross-cultural research’, in MurdyJ., ed., Proceedings of the 2003 North-Eastern Recreation Research Symposium, Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Newtown Square, PA, pp 338–344.
4.
CromptonJ.L. (1979), ‘Motivations for pleasure vacation’, Annals of Tourism Research, Vol 6, pp 408–424.
5.
DeversK.J. (1999), ‘How will we know ‘good’ qualitative research when we see it? Beginning the dialogue in health services research’, Health Services Research, Vol 34, pp 1153–1188.
6.
EaglesP.F. (1992), ‘The travel motivations of Canadian ecotourists’, Journal of Travel Research, Vol 31, pp 3–7.
7.
FadeS.A. (2003), ‘Communicating and judging the quality of qualitative research: The need for a new language’, Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics, Vol 16, pp 139–149.
8.
FrankelR.M.DeversK.J. (2000), ‘Study design in qualitative research – 1: Developing research questions and assessing research needs’, Education for Health, Vol 13, pp 251–261.
9.
GilbertD.HudsonS. (2000), ‘Tourism demand constraints: A skiing participation’, Annals of Tourism Research, Vol 27, pp 906–925.
10.
HorsburghD. (2003), ‘Evaluation of qualitative research’, Journal of Clinical Nursing, Vol 12, pp 307–312.
11.
HubbardJ.MannellR. (2001), ‘Testing competing models of the leisure constraint and negotiation process in a corporate employee recreation setting’, Leisure Sciences, Vol 23, pp 145–163.
12.
JacksonE.L.RucksV.C. (1995), ‘Negotiation of leisure constraints by junior high and high school students: An exploratory study’, Journal of Leisure Research, Vol 27, pp 85–105.
KleiberD.A.NimrodG. (2009), ‘I can't be very sad: Constraint and adaptation in the leisure of a learning in retirement group’, Leisure Studies, Vol 28, pp 67–83.
15.
KimmmJ. (2009a), ‘Why do Korean golf travellers cross national borders to play golf?’, Journal of Tourism, Vol 10, pp 67–82.
16.
KimmmJ. (2009b), ‘Three-Factor Model and Pyramid Model of Leisure Constraints’, Journal of Travel and Tourism Research, Vol 9, pp 122–138.
17.
KimmmJ. (2010a), ‘Is travelling still exclusive?’, Journal of Tourism, Vol 11, pp 61–67.
18.
KimmmJ. (2010b), ‘Three-Factor Model of Equity in Travel Opportunities’, e-Review of Tourism Research, Vol 8, pp 12–29.
19.
KimmmJ. (2011), ‘Golf travel and definitions’, Journal of Tourism, Vol 11, pp 67–73.
20.
KozakM. (2002), ‘Comparative analysis of tourist motivations by nationality and destinations’, Tourism Management, Vol 23, pp 221–232.
21.
LittleD.E. (2002), ‘Women and adventure recreation; reconstructing leisure constraints and adventure experiences to negotiate continuing participation’, Journal of Leisure Research, Vol 34, pp 157–177.
22.
Loucks-AtkinsonA.MannellR.C. (2007), ‘Role of self-efficacy in the constraints negotiation process: The case of individuals with fibromyalgia syndrome’, Leisure Sciences, Vol 29, pp 19–36.
23.
RittichainuwatB.N. (2008), ‘Responding to disaster: Thai and Scandinavian tourists' motivation to visit Phuket, Thailand’, Journal of Travel Research, Vol 46, pp 422–432.
24.
RossE.L.D.Iso-AholaS.E. (1991), ‘Sightseeing tourists' motivation and satisfaction’, Annals of Tourism Research, Vol 18, pp 226–237.
25.
SeidmanI.E. (1991), Interviewing as Qualitative Research, New York: Teachers College Press.
26.
SonJ.KerstetterD.MowenA. (2008), ‘Do age and gender matter in the constraint negotiation of physically active leisure?’, Journal of Leisure Research, Vol 40, pp 267–289.
27.
WhiteD.D. (2008), ‘A structural model of leisure constraints negotiation in outdoor recreation’, Leisure Sciences, Vol 30, pp 342–359.
