Attempts by policy-makers to encourage diasporas to engage in development in the Global South rely on conceptions of behaviour drawn from economics that emphasize individual choice, stimuli and motivations. This article argues that diasporas are better understood as ‘communities of practice’ in which actions are conceptualized as part of a wider social system based on embodied knowledge acquired through socialization, technology and the habituation of particular lifestyles. Using social theories of practice to analyze remittances draws attention to the symptomatic silences of dominant theorizations of behaviour. Existing theorizations underpin, and thereby uncritically endorse, potentially unsustainable development policies based on remittances. The alternative approach presented here opens up new areas for policy and research based on medium to long-term changes in the socio-technical remittance regime.
AbregoL.2009: Economic well-being in Salvadoran transnational families: How gender affects remittance practices. Journal of Marriage and the Family71, 1070–85.
2.
AcostaP.A.LarteyE.K.K.MandelmanF.S.2009: Remittances and the Dutch disease. Journal of International Economics79, 102–16.
3.
African Union. 2005: Report of the meeting of experts from member states on the definition of the African diaspora. 11th–12th April, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
4.
AguniasD.R.2009: Closing the distance: How governments strengthen ties with their diasporas. Migration Policy Institute, Washington, DC.
5.
AkessonL.2009: Remittances and inequality in Cape Verde: The impact of changing family organization. Global Networks9, 381–98.
6.
AlamG.M.HoqueK.E.2010: Who gains from ‘brain and body drain’ business – developing/developed world or individuals: A comparative study between skilled and semi/unskilled emigrants African. Journal of Business Management4, 534–48.
7.
Amuedo-DorantesC.PozoS.Vargas-SilvaC.2010: Remittances in small island developing states. Journal of Development Studies46, 941–60.
8.
AnyanwuJ.C.ErhijakporA.E.O.2010: Do international remittances affect poverty in Africa?African Development Review22, 51–91.
9.
BakewellO.2008: Keeping them in their place: The ambivalent relationship between development and migration in Africa. Third World Quarterly29, 1341–58.
10.
BakewellO.2009: Migration, diasporas and development: Some critical perspectives. Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik229, 787–802.
11.
BinfordL.2003: Migrant remittances and (under)development in Mexico. Critique of Anthropology23, 305–36.
12.
Bob-MilliarG.M.2009: Chieftaincy, diaspora, and development: The institution of Nksuohene in Ghana. African Affairs108, 541–58.
13.
BourdieuP.1977: Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge University Press.
14.
BourdieuP.; 1990: The logic of practice. Polity, Cambridge.
15.
BrinkerhoffJ.M. editor. 2008: Diasporas and development: Exploring the potential. Lynne Rienner.
16.
CampbellE.K.2010: The role of remittances in Botswana: Does internal migration really reward sending families?Population, Space and Place16, 151–64.
17.
CastlesS.2008: Development and migration – migration and development: What comes first?Paper presented to Social Science Research Council, conference on Migration and development: future directions for research and policy, March 2008, New York, http://www.imi.ox.ac.uk/pdfs/S%20Castles%20Mig%20and%20Dev%20for%20SSRC%20April%2008.pdf, last accessed on 20 November 2011.
18.
CattaneoC.2009: International migration, the brain drain and poverty: A cross-country analysis. World Economy32, 1180–202.
19.
CohenJ.JonesR.ConwayD.2005: Why remittances shouldn’t be blamed for rural under-development in Mexico: A collective response to Leigh Binford. Critique of Anthropology25, 87–96.
20.
DattaK.McIlwaineC.J.WillsJ.EvansY.HerbertJ.MayJ.2007: The new development finance or exploiting migrant labour? Remittance sending among low-paid migrant workers in London. International Development Planning Review29, 43–67.
21.
de CerteauM.1984: The practice of everyday life. University of California Press.
22.
de HaasH.2007: Turning the tide? Why development will not stop migration. Development and Change38, 819–41.
23.
de HaasH.2010: Migration and development: A theoretical perspective. International Migration Review44, 227–64.
24.
de la FuenteA.2010: Remittances and vulnerability to poverty in rural Mexico. World Development38, 828–39.
25.
DustmannC.MestresJ.2010: Remittances and temporary migration. Journal of Development Economics92, 62–70.
26.
EcksteinS.2010: Remittances and their unintended consequences in Cuba. World Development38, 1047–55.
27.
FordK.JampaklayA.ChamratrithirongA.2009: The impact of circular migration and remittances on relative household wealth in Kanchanaburi Province, Thailand. Asian and Pacific Migration Journal18, 283–301.
28.
GiddensA.1984: The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Polity.
29.
GiddensA.1991: Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Polity.
30.
GoetghebuerT.PlatteauJ.P.2010: Inheritance patterns in migration-prone communities of the Peruvian Highlands. Journal of Development Economics93, 71–87.
31.
HahnH.P.KluteG. editors. 2008: Cultures of migration: African perspectives. Lit Verlag.
32.
HugoG.2009: Best practice in temporary labour migration for development: A perspective from Asia and the Pacific. International Migration47, 23–74.
33.
International Organization for Migration (IOM). 2003: The migration-development nexus. IOM, Geneva.
JenkinsR.2002: Pierre Bourdieu (revised edition). Routledge.
36.
JettingerG.B.2010: Unravelling gender and participation in migrant associations: An ethnographic study of a Senegalese village community in Paris, Dakar and Sinthiane. Unpublished D.Phil. thesis, University of Oxford.
37.
JhaS.SugiyartoG.Vargas-SilvaC.2010: The global crisis and the impact on remittances to developing Asia. Global Economic Review39, 59–82.
38.
JoarderM.A.M.SalehU.2010: Estimating the economic model of Hundi using micro-level data. Asia Europe Journal8, 61–75.
39.
JohnsonG.E.WhitelawW.E.1974: Urban-rural income transfers in Kenya: An estimated remittances function. Economic Development and Cultural Change22, 473–79.
40.
KapurD.2004: Remittances: The new development mantra?G-24 Discussion Paper No. 29, United Nations.
41.
KleistN.2008: Mobilising ‘the diaspora’: Somali transnational political engagement. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies34, 307–23.
42.
LampertB.2009: Diaspora and development? Nigerian organizations in London and the transnational politics of belonging. Global Networks9, 162–84.
43.
LampertB.2010: Diaspora and development? Nigerian organisations in London and their transnational linkages with ‘home’. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Department of Geography, UCL.
44.
LatapiA.E.2009: Can migration foster development in Mexico? The case of poverty and inequality. International Migration47, 75–113.
45.
LaveJ.WengerE.1991: Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
46.
LindleyA.2009a: Remittances and conflict: Some conceptual considerations. Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik229, 774–86.
47.
LindleyA.2009b: The early-morning Phonecall: Remittances from a refugee diaspora perspective. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies35, 1315–334.
48.
LokshinM.Bontch-OsmolovskiM.GlinskayaE.2010: Work-related migration and poverty reduction in Nepal. Review of Development Economics14, 323–32.
49.
LoomisT.1990: Cook island remittances: Volumes, determinants and uses. In ConnellJ. editor, Migration and development in the South Pacific. National Centre for Development Studies, Australian National University, Canberra, 61–81.
50.
LucasR.E.B.StarkO.1985: Motivations to remit: Evidence from Botswana. Journal of Political Economy93, 901–18.
51.
LukeN.2010: Migrants’ competing commitments: Sexual partners in urban Africa and remittances to the rural origin. American Journal of Sociology115, 1435–479.
52.
MercerC.PageB.EvansM.2008: Development and the African diaspora: Place and the politics of home. Zed.
53.
MercerC.PageB.EvansM.2009: Unsettling connections: Transnational networks, development and African home associations. Global Networks9, 141–61.
54.
MerzB.J.ChenL.C.GeithnerP.F. editors. 2007: Diasporas and development. Harvard University Press
55.
MohanG.2006: Embedded cosmopolitanism and the politics of obligation: The Ghanaian diaspora and development. Environment and PlanningA 38, 867–83.
56.
MohanG.2008: Making neoliberal states of development: The Ghanaian diaspora and the politics of homelands. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space26, 464–79.
57.
NieswandB.2009: Development and diaspora: Ghana and its migrants. Sociologus59, 17–31.
58.
NijenhuisG.2010: Embedding international migration: The response of Bolivian local governments and NGOs to international migration. Environment and Urbanization22, 67–79.
59.
NikasC.BaklavasG.2009: Savings and remitting attitudes of Albanian emigrants – an exploratory data analysis. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies9, 481–95.
60.
ObadareE.AdebanwiW.2009: Transnational resource flow and the paradoxes of belonging: Re-directing the debate on transnationalism, remittances, state and citizenship in Africa. Review of African Political Economy36, 419–517.
61.
Obeng-OdoomF.2010: Urban real estate in Ghana: A study of housing-related remittances from Australia. Housing Studies25, 357–73.
62.
OdoziJ.C.AwoyemiT.T.OmononaB.T.2010: Household poverty and inequality: The implication of migrants’ remittances in Nigeria. Journal of Economic Policy Reform13, 191–99.
63.
OrozcoM.2002: Globalization and migration: The impact of family remittances in Latin America. Latin American Politics and Society44, 41–66.
64.
PageB.2007: Slow going: The mortuary, modernity and the hometown association in Bali-Nyonga, Cameroon. Africa77, 419–41.
65.
PageB.EvansM.MercerC.2010: Revisiting the politics of belonging one decade on in Cameroon: The Bali-Bawock case. Africa80, 345–70.
66.
Perez-ArmendarizC.CrowD.2010: Do migrants remit democracy? International migration, political beliefs, and behavior in Mexico. Comparative Political Studies43, 119–48.
67.
Perez-CaldenteyE.VernengoM.2010: Back to the future: Latin America’s current development strategy. Journal of Post Keynsian Economics32, 623–44.
68.
PeterK.B.2010: Transnational family ties, remittance motives, and social Death among Congolese migrants: A socio-anthropological analysis. Journal of Comparative Family Studies41, 225–43.
69.
PhillipsN.2009: Migration as development strategy? The new political economy of dispossession and inequality in the Americas. Review of International Political Economy16, 231–59.
70.
RaghuramP.2009: Which migration, which development? Unsettling the edifice of migration and development. Population, Space and Place15, 103–17.
71.
RankinK.2003: Anthropologies and geographies of globalization. Progress in Human Geography27, 708–34.
72.
RaoB.B.TakiruaT.B.2010: The effects of exports, aid and Remittances on output: The case of Kiribati. Applied Economics42, 1387–396.
73.
RathaD.2007: Leveraging remittances for development. Migration Policy Institute Policy Brief, Washington, DC.
74.
ReckwitzA.2002: Toward a theory of social practices: A development in culturalist theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory5, 243–63.
75.
RempelH.LobdellR.A.1978: The role of urban-to-rural remittances in rural development. Journal of Development Studies14, 324–41.
76.
SallM.2010: Straightforward critics or would-be candidates? International migrants and the management of local affairs and development: The case of the Senegal River valley. Environment and Urbanization22, 81–89.
77.
SchatzkiT.R.2001: Introduction: Practice theory. In SchatzkiT.R.CetinaK. K.von SavignyE., editors, 2001: The practice turn in contemporary theory. Routledge, London, 1–14.
