The debate on whether genetically engineered (GE) crops can alleviate poverty in Africa continues to intensify. Thus far only one GE crop has been commercialized among smallholders – a pest resistant form of cotton – and only in two sub-Saharan African (SSA) countries. We present evidence from Burkina Faso to argue that GE cotton adoption may increase the risk of all producers, may only bring benefits in the short term and may only benefit the relatively rich more than the relatively poor. These findings challenge the popular assumption that GE crops are the best way to alleviate rural poverty in SSA.
Bingen, J.2006: Politics, agricultural science and technology in sub-Saharan Africa: The challenges of genetically-engineered crops . Invited paper for an Interdisciplinary Conference, Culture, Nature, Future? Perspectives on Science and Development in Africa. 12–13 April 2006. Edinburgh, Scotland.
2.
Bingen, J.2008: Genetically-engineered cotton: Politics, science and power in West Africa. In Moseley, B. and Gray, L. , editors, Hanging by a thread: Cotton, globalization and poverty in Africa. Ohio University Press , 227–50.
3.
Heinisch, E.2006: West Africa versus the United States on cotton subsidies: how, why and what next?Journal of Modern African Studies44, 251–74 .
4.
Héma, O. , Somé, H.N. , Traoré, O. , Greenplate, J. and Abdennadher, M.2009: Efficacy of transgenic cotton plant containing the Cry1Ac and Cry2Ab of Bacillus thuringiensis against Helicoverpa armigera and Syllepte derogata in cotton cultivation in Burkina Faso . Crop Protection28, 205–14 .
5.
Hofs, J.-L. , Fok, M. and Vaissayre, M.2006: Impact of BT cotton adoption on pesticide use by smallholders: A 2-year survey in Makhatini Flats (South Africa) . Crop Protection25, 984–88 .
6.
International Assessment of Agricultural Knowledge, Science and Technology for Development (IAASTD). 2008: The United Nations .
7.
International Services for the Acquistions of Agri-biotech Applications (ISAAA). 2009: Knowledge, technology, alleviation of poverty video, http://www.isaaa.org/resources/videos/gs2008/abridged/, last accessed on 6 July 2009.
8.
Ledford, H.2009: Pests could overcome GM cotton toxins. Nature News. 6 July 2009, http://www.nature.com.oca.ucsc.edu/news/2009/090706/full/news.2009.629.html, last accessed on 3 August 2009.
9.
Liu, F. , Zhiping, X. , Chang, J. , Chen, J. , Meng, F. , Cheng Zhu, Y. and Shen, J.2008: Resistance allele frequency to Bt cotton in field populations of Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in China . Journal of Economic Entomology101, 933–43 .
10.
Liu, Y.B. , Tabashnik, B.E. , Dennehy, T.J. , Patin, A.L. , Sims, M.A. , Meyer, S.K. and Carrière, Y.2001: Bt cotton and Cry1AcToxin on survival and development of pink bollworm (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) . Journal of Economic Entomology94, 1237–42 .
11.
Luo, Z. , Dong, H. , Weijiang, L. , Ming, Z. and Zhu, Y.2008: Individual and combined effects of salinity and waterlogging on Cry1Ac expression and insecticidal efficacy of BT cotton . Crop Protection27, 1485–90 .
12.
Men, X. , Ge, F. , Edwards, C. and Yardim, E.2005: The influence of pesticide application on Helicoverpa armigera Hübner and sucking pests in transgenic Bt cotton and non-transgenic cotton in China . Crop Protection24, 319–24 .
13.
Morse, S. and Mannion, A.M.2009: Can genetically modified cotton contribute to sustainable development in Africa . Progress in Development Studies9, 225–47 .
14.
Paarlberg, R.2008: Starved for science: How biotechnology is being kept out of Africa. Cambridge: Harvard University Press .
15.
Qaim, M. and Zilberman, D.2003: Yield effects of genetically modified crops in developing countries . Science299, 900–02 .
16.
Rochester, I.J.2006: Effect of genotype, edaphic, environmental conditions and agronomic practices on Cry1Ac protein expression in transgenic cotton . The Journal of Cotton Science10, 252–62 .
17.
Samadoulougou, L.L.2004: Coton et Organisations Paysannes au Burkina Faso . A study commissioned by the Interchurch Organisation for Development Co-operation (ICCO).
18.
Tabashnik, B.E. , Unnithan, G.C. , Masson, L. , Crowder, D.W. , Li, X. and Carrière, Y.2009: Asymmetrical cross-resistance between Bacillus thuringiensis toxins Cry1Ac and Cry2Ab in pink bollworm . Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences106, 11889–94 .
19.
Thirtle, C. , Beyers, L. , Ismael, Y. and Piesse, J.2003: Can GM-technologies help the poor? The impact of BT cotton in Makhathini Flats, KwaZulu-Natal . World Development31, 717–32 .
20.
United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). 2009: 1.02 billion people hungry: One sixth of humanity undernourished – more than ever. Published on 19 June 2009, http://www.fao.org/news/story/en/item/20568/icode/, last accessed on 6 July 2009.
21.
Van der Pol, F. and Traoré, B.1993: Soil nutrient depletion by agricultural production in Southern Mali. Fertilizer Research36, 79–90 .
22.
Vitale, J. , Boyer, T. , Uaiene, R. and Sanders, J.H.2007: The economic impacts of introducing BT technologies in smallholder cotton production systems of West Africa: A case study from Mali . AgBioForum10, 71–84 .
23.
Vitale, J. , Greenplate, J. , Abdennadher, M. and Traoré, O.2008: Second-generation BT cotton field trials in Burkina Faso: Analzying the potential benefits to West African farmers . Crop Science48, 1958–66.
24.
Wang, S. , Just, D. and Pinstrup-Andersen, P.2006: Tarnishing silver bullets: BT technology adoption, bounded rationality and the outbreak of secondary pest infestations in China . Paper presented at American Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting, Long Beach, CA, 22–26 July.
