Size of membership, diverging interest because of different stages of development and the depth of regulation undertaken or foreseen in the World Trade Organization (WTO) made the economics and politics of international trade negotiations more complicated. This has repercussions on the negotiating mechanics in the WTO including the continued appropriateness of the technique of ‘rounds’. At the same time, the rational of further trade liberalization in the context of sustainable development is questioned. The widening scope of issues covered – which impact of domestic policies give raise to – quests for more transparency and accountability. The lack of adequate know-how renders the effective participation of developing countries in the negotiating round more difficult or even impossible. New forms of network formation – drawing on the many forms of international cooperation, participation and agenda setting – have to be developed in order to maintain the WTO as the centre of the multilateral rule-based system.
Armstrong, D.
,
Lloyd, L.
and
Redmond, J.2004: International organisation in world politics.
Palgrave
, 3rd edition.
2.
Baldwin, R.E.2007:
Political economy of the disappointing Doha Round of trade negotiations
. Pacific Economic Review12;
255–66
.
3.
Barnett, M.
and
Finnemore, B.2004: Rules for the world – international organizations in global politics.
Cornell University Press
.
4.
Bello, W.2006: The debacle of Doha. FPIF Commentary, July 28, referring to studies by the
World Bank and the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO)
. http://www.fpif.org/fpiftxt/3393, last accessed on 22 August 2009.
5.
Benedek, W.2005: Die Europäische Union im Streitbeile-gungsverfahren der WTO. (The role of the European Union in the dispute settlement procedure of the WTO).
6.
Bronckers
and
van den Broek
. 2005:
Financial compensation in the WTO: Improving the remedies of WTO dispute settlement
. Journal of International Economic Law8,
101–26
.
7.
Cass, D.2005: The constitutionalization of the World Trade Organization.
Oxford University Press
.
8.
Cottey, A.2007: Security in the new Europe.
Palgrave
.
9.
Council. A secure Europe in a better world. http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cmsUpload/78367.pdf.
10.
Diego-Fernandez, M.2008:
Trade negotiations make strange bedfellows
. World Trade Review7,
423–53
.
11.
Doha Development Agenda. 2001: http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dda_e/dda_e.htm#top, last accessed on 22 August 2009.
12.
Ehlermann, C-D.
and
Ehring, L.2005:
Decision-making in the World Trade Organization
. Journal of International Economic Law8,
51–75
.
13.
European Commission. 2005: ‘EBA’ – Everything But Arms initiative: Special arrangements for Least Developed Countries. http://ec.europa.eu/trade/issues/global/gsp/eba/index_en.htm, last accessed on 10 October 2009.
14.
European Voice. 2005: Mandelson faces China flak as old trade theory ‘unravels’, 29 September.
15.
Financial Times. 2006:
Doha unity boils down to a matter of trust and time
. 30 January.
16.
Milner, H.
and
Kubota, K.2005:
Why the move to Free Trade? Democracy and trade policy in the developing countries
. International Organization59,
157–93
.
17.
Kerremans, B.2004:
What went wrong in Cancun? A principal agent view on the EU's rationale towards the Doha Development Round
. European Foreign Affairs Review9,
363–93
.
18.
Kinnman, S.
and
Lodefalk, M.2007:
What is at stake in the Doha Round?The World Economy, 30,
1305–25
.
19.
Lamy, P.2005: Speech at the Trade and Development Board of UNCTAD, 6 October. Available at http://www.wto.org/english/news_e/sppl_e/sppl05_e.htm, last accessed on 22 August 2009.
20.
O'Connor, B.
and
Djordjevic, M.2005:
Practical aspects of monetary compensation: The US-copyright case
. Journal of International Economic Law8,
127–42
.
21.
Ostry, S.2001: World Trade Organization: Institutional design for better governance. In
Porter
,
Sauvé
,
Subramanian
and
Zampetti
, editors, Efficiency, equity, and legitimacy – The multilateral trading system at the millennium.
Brookings Institution Press
, 361–80.
22.
Petersmann, E.U.2005: Reforming the world trading system.
Oxford University Press
.
23.
Polaski, S.2005: http://www.carnegieendowment.org/files/PO18.polaski.FINAL.pdf, last accessed on 22 August 2009.
24.
Polaski, S.2006: Winners and losers: Impact of the Doha Round on developing countries.
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
.
25.
Porter, Sauve, Subramanian
and
Zampetti
. 2001: Efficiency, Equality, and Legitimacy: The Multilateral Trading System and the Millennium.
Washington, Brookings Press
.
26.
Reinert, K.2007:
The European Union, the Doha Round, and Asia
. Asia Europe Journal5(3),
317–30
.
27.
Reiterer, M.1998: ‘Das multilaterale Weltwirtschaftsrecht WTO: Auf dem Weg zum (The multilateral trade regime of the WTO: A world trade law in the making?). In
Köck, H.
editor, Rechtsfragen an der Jahrtausendwende (Legal problems at the turn of the century).
Linde
, 164–69.
28.
Reiterer, M.2005:
Regional free trade arrangements and multilateral trade policy: The view from Europe
. The Annual Bulletin of the Japan Academy for International Trade and Business, 42(March),
19–29
.
29.
Reiterer, M.2006:
Interregionalism as a new diplomatic tool: The EU and East Asia
. EFAR 11,
223–43
.
30.
Shaffer, G.2005: Power, governance and the WTO: A comparative institutional approach. In
Barnett
and
Duvall
, editors, Power in Global Governance.
Cambridge University Press
, 130–60.
31.
Slaughter, A-M.2004: A new world order.
Princeton University Press
.
32.
Supachai, P.2005: The report of the consultative board on The Future of the WTO – Addressing institutional changes in the new millennium, commissioned by former
WTO Director Generalhttp://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/10anniv_e/future_wto_e.htm, last accessed on 22 August 2009.
33.
Winham, G.2005: The evolution of the global trade regime. In
Ravenhill, J.
, editor, Global political economy.
Oxford University Press
, 87–115.
34.
Wolf, M.2001: What the world needs from the multilateral trading system. In
Sampson, G.
, editor, The role of the World Trade Organization in global governance.
United Nations University Press
, 185–86.
35.
World Trade Organization. 1998: http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/cases_e/ds58_e.htm.
36.
World Bank and IMF. 2005: Aid for trade: Competitiveness and adjustment. Joint Note by the
Staffs of the World Bank and IMF
. Available at http://www.imf.org/external/np/pp/eng/2005/041205b.pdf, last accessed on 12 April 2005.
37.
Young, A.R.2007:
Trade politics ain't what it used to be: The European Union in the Doha Round
. Journal of Common Market Studies45,
789–811
.
